1. Tripartite Tokyo September 2007 Procedural
4.3 Common Performance Indicators
Tor E. Svensen
Det Norske Veritas
IACS Council Chairman

2. Purpose and methodology
To set and report IACS quality and technical performance benchmarks and targets
To publish results
Methodology
Annual results are reviewed
CPI’s effective from 2008
CPI’s organised under:
Port State Control
IACS Audit Performance
Internal Fleet Quality Tracking, and
Resources

3. Port State Control
CPI 1 Members included in Paris and USCG high performance lists
Members ranked in two out of three years to be included
CPI 2 IACS and Member’s Paris, Tokyo MoU, and USCG class related detentions as a percentage of inspections and vessel arrivals
CPI 3 IACS and Member’s Paris, and Tokyo MoU, total detentions as a percentage of inspections
Figures include non-class related detentions

4. IACS Audit Performance and Internal Fleet Quality Tracking
CPI 4 Continuous improvement in relation to significant audit trends
Performance targets applied to predefined categories
Selected ”Audit focus issues” to be included
Internal Fleet Quality Tracking
CPI 5 Members are to have an effective method of targeting potentially sub-standard ships to a performance benchmark
Replacement CPI to be developed for 2008

5. Resources
Developed to demonstrate IACS commitment to maintaining the industry’s safety, quality and technical performance standards
IACS will start collecting information on resources internally, but the use of the quantitative information as CPIs needs to be further developed/considered before they can be published externally.

6. Resources CPI 6 Number of Surveyors
CPI 7 Research, Rule and Procedure Spend
CPI 8 IACS Common Spend
CPI 9 Member’s Training Spend

7. Thank you
For your attention