1. FACILITATORS OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT APRIL 2016 Lisa Guzzardo Asaro Deane Spencer

2. NETWORKING Dialogue Dice  Each person in your group will take a turn rolling the dice and sharing briefly an experience in response to the written prompt. Dialogue Dice Notes  Use the notes page to jot down ideas shared. Data Planner  Use this to reference during dialogue time. Handout

3. TODAY’S ROADMAP  Welcome  Networking: Dialogue Dice  Updates  Diagnostics & Goal/Plan  SIP Language  Strategy Development at the Activity Level  Program Evaluation

4. KEY WORKING AGREEMENTS A FACILITATION TOOL  Respect all Points of View  Be Present and Engaged  Honor Time Agreements  Get All Voices in the Room

5. 5 PARKING LOT A FACILITATION TOOL  Rest questions that do not benefit the whole group  Place questions that do not pertain to content at this time  Place questions that pertain, but participants do not want to ask at this time

6. ACTION REQUIRED CHART  Any request by you that we need to respond to must be placed on the Action Required Chart  You need to PRINT your complete name, school, and email address 6

7. SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROCESS School Improvement Activities and Requirements Monthly Checklist Handout

9. ASSIST UPDATES

10. UPDATES  Save the Dates  April ASSIST Update  e|Prove  DAS Spotlight News  M-STEP  Principal Packet

11. Welcome to AdvancED’s e|Prove PLATFORM NEW as of January 2016

14. DIVISION OF ACCOUNTABILITY SERVICES (DAS) ASSESSMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY HTTP://WWW.MICHIGAN.GOV/MDE/0,1607,7-140-22709---,00.HTML HTTP://WWW.MICHIGAN.GOV/MDE/0,1607,7-140-22709---,00.HTML 14 Sign up to receive

15. M-STEP K-2 UPDATE

16. PRINCIPAL PACKET  Comprehensive Needs Assessment Process Rubric  Updated Section 31a Information  e|Prove Survey Access ppt  MDE M-STEP Claim Proficiency  Assessment Planner Example Warren Woods  MDE Accountability Update from MSTC Conference  District Technology Plan in ASSIST

17. 17 FOCUS

18. GATHER STUDY PLAN DO ASSIST COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESS OUTCOME DATA DEMOGRAPHIC DATA PROCESS DATA PERCEPTION DATA IDENTIFY STRENGTHS AND CHALLENGES CONDUCT RESEARCH TO DETERMINE STRATEGIES UNPACK STRATEGIES TO CREATE ACTION PLAN Revisit, Review, and Revise PLAN AS NEEDED MONITOR & EVALUATE IMPLEMENTATION (ADULT BEHAVIORS) MONITOR & EVALUATE IMPACT (STUDENT GROWTH) SCHOOL SYSTEMS REVIEW SCHOOL DATA PROFILE PROGRAM EVALUATION BEGINS TITLE I DIAGNOSTIC DATA COLLECTION SCHOOL SYSTEMS REVIEW SCHOOL DATA ANALYSIS DATA PLANNER RESEARCH BEST PRACTICES TITLE I DIAGNOSTIC DATA ANALYSIS GOALS AND PLANS ACTION PLAN PROGRAM EVALUATION TOOL FINALIZED Created by Dodie Raycraft and modified for purposes in Macomb County Revisit, Review, and Revise PLAN AS NEEDED Handout

19. CNA RUBRIC

20. SIP Components for Submission C 1. School Executive Summary Diagnostic Site Decision C 2. Improvement Plan Stakeholder Involvement Diagnostic ALL EXCEPT PRIORITY C 3. School Data Analysis Diagnostic ALL, Site Decision -except those AdvancED MI schools having an External Review (ER) this year, -instead, complete: Student Performance and Stakeholder Feedback C 4. Additional Requirements Diagnostic ALL C5. Title I Targeted Assistance or School-wide Diagnostics (Title I Schools) R 6. Goals and Plan ALL, except Most Priority These COMPONENTS can be accessed or copied by clicking on the PORTFOLIO TAB in ASSIST How many SIP Components do you need to COMPLETE by 09.01.16? C= COPY R=Revisit, Review, Revise/Create 2016-17 Goals Plan Handout

21. MDE and AdvancED Michigan

22. Templates Resources www.advanc-ed.org/partnership/mde

23. 23 Stage Three, Step 9 PLAN Develop Action Plan

24. SCHOOL EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DIAGNOSTIC 1 Executive Summary for Schools The Executive Summary (ES) provides the school an opportunity to describe in narrative form its vision as well as strengths and challenges within the context of continuous improvement. Use the links below to navigate the Executive Summary and respond to the various questions. The responses should be brief, descriptive, and appropriate for the specific section. It is recommended that the responses are written offline and then transferred into the sections below. Description of the School Describe the school's size, community/communities, location, and changes it has experienced in the last three years. Include demographic information about the students, staff, and community at large. What unique features and challenges are associated with the community/communities the school serves? School’s Purpose (VISIONS, MISSION, BELIEF STATEMENTS) Provide the school's purpose statement and ancillary content such as mission, vision, values, and/or beliefs. Describe how the school embodies its purpose through its program offerings and expectations for students. Notable Achievements and Areas of Improvement Describe the school's notable achievements and areas of improvement in the last three years. Additionally, describe areas for improvement that the school is striving to achieve in the next three years. Additional Information Provide any additional information you would like to share with the public and community that were not prompted in the previous sections.

25. IMPROVEMENT PLAN STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT DIAGNOSTIC 2 Improvement Plan Stakeholder Involvement Diagnostic Describe the process used to engage a variety of stakeholders in the development of the institution's improvement plan. Include information on how stakeholders were selected and informed of their roles, and how meetings were scheduled to accommodate them. Describe the representations from stakeholder groups that participated in the development of the improvement plan and their responsibilities in this process. Explain how the final improvement plan was communicated to all stakeholders, and the method and frequency in which stakeholders receive information on its progress.

26. 26 Stages Two & Three STUDY Analyze Data Set Goals Set Measurable Objectives Study Research PLAN Develop Action Plan

27. SCHOOL DATA ANALYSIS DIAGNOSTIC 3 School Data Analysis This must be copied, relabeled, and attached to your 2016-17 SIP. NEW LABEL 2016-17 SDA

28. WHAT 10/10/2014 Office of Education Improvement & Innovation www.mi.gov/osi 28 Demographic DataAchievement/ Outcome Data Process DataPerception Data Enrollment Subgroups of students Staff Attendance (Students and Staff) Mobility Graduation and Dropout Conference attendance Education status Student subgroups Parent involvement Teaching staff Course enrollment patterns Discipline referrals Suspension rates Alcohol ‐ tobacco ‐ drug violations Extracurricular participation Physical, mental, social and health Local assessments: District Common Assessments, Classroom Assessments, Report Cards State assessments: MME, SAT M-STEP, MI- Access, ELPA National assessments: SAT, PSAT8/9, PSAT10 WorkKeys, NWEA, ITBS, CAT, MET NAEP, PSAT GPA Dropout rates College acceptance Policies and procedures (e.g. grading, homework, attendance, discipline) Academic and behavior expectations Parent participation: PT conferences, PTO/PTA, volunteers Suspension data School Process Indicators (SSR 26 Indicators) or (ISA/SA) Event occurred: Who, what, when, where, why, how What you did for whom: E.g. All 8th graders received violence prevention Survey data (student, parent, staff, community) Opinions (Clarify what others think. People act based on what they believe. How do they see you/us?) What Data Do YOU Collect?

29. SCHOOL DATA ANALYSIS As of March 2015 OR

30. Data Enables a Dialogue around a Situation

31. CREATED A PLAN IN JANUARY AND FEBRUARY! 31 Use the School Data Analysis Diagnostic from your submitted 2015-16, School Improvement Plan to examine your current Data Plan. Have you considered where you have challenges and where you have strengths? Handout

32. PLANNING WORKSHEET 2 YEARS OF OUTCOME DATA

33. PLANNING WORKSHEET 2 YEARS OF DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

34. PLANNING WORKSHEET 2 YEARS OF PROCESS AND PERCEPTION DATA

35. SCHOOL DATA ANALYSIS DIAGNOSTIC 3 EXCEPT MI AdvancED Schools the year of an EXTERNAL REVIEW; you will also need to complete a: Student Performance Diagnostic

36. ADVANCED MICHIGAN SCHOOLS THE YEAR OF AN EXTERNAL REVIEW (SDA) OMIT Perception Data SAY: See Stakeholder Feedback Diagnostic OMIT: Achievement Data SAY: See Student Performance Diagnostic Complete all other parts 1 2 3 SDA

37. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS DIAGNOSTIC 4 School Additional Requirements Diagnostic This diagnostic contains certification requirements for Michigan schools. This diagnostic must be completed by all schools. Literacy and math are tested annually in grades 1-5. Our school published a fully compliant Annual Ed Report. (The Annual Education Report (AER) satisfies this). If yes, please provide a link to the report in the box below. Our school has the 8th grade parent approved Educational Development Plans (EDPs) on file. Our school reviews and annually updates the EDPs to ensure academic course work alignment. The institution complies with all federal laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination and with all requirements and regulations of the U.S. Department of Education. It is the policy of this institution that no person on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry, age, gender, height, weight, marital status or disability shall be subjected to discrimination in any program, service or activity for which the institution is responsible, or for which it receives financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Education. References: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Elliott-Larsen prohibits discrimination against religion. The institution has designated an employee to coordinate efforts to comply with and carry out non-discrimination responsibilities. If yes, list the name, position, address and telephone number of the employee in the comment field. The institution has a School-Parent Involvement Plan (that addresses Section 1118 activities) that is aligned to the District's Board Policy. If yes, please attach the School-Parent Involvement Plan below. The institution has a School-Parent Compact. If yes, please attach the School- Parent Compact below. The School has additional information necessary to support your improvement plan (optional).

38. GOALS COMPLETION TIMELINE HAVE YOU REGISTERED YOUR SI TEAM? Title I SI Team Days April 26, 27, or 28, 2016 Non-Title I SI Team Days May 3, 4, 5, 10, or 11, 2016 Goals completed and submitted to be viewed by District May 15, 2016

39. GOALS ONEType of Goal Academic Organizational TWO:Measureable Objective Three:Strategy Four: Activity Use the Goals & Plan TAB in ASSIST 5

41. ONE: GOALS AND PLAN 2016-17 Revisit, Review, Revise a Goal at any level: 1 Revise your Goals 1) Click the Goals/Plan Tab 2) Enter the Goal Here

42. CREATING A 2016-17 PLAN TO SUBMIT WITH YOUR SIP COMPONENTS REPORT Do NOT create your PLAN until your GOALS are Revisited, Reviewed, and Revised.

43. GOAL NAME “All students will be proficient in (content area).” You must select if a goal is an academic or organization goal. An academic goal is a goal in one of the five content areas. An organizational goal focuses around other criteria; such as, revamping the school structure, school culture/climate, student behavior, etc.

44. 3 OPTIONS FOR SETTING MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES Option One Continue using local data Option Two Use NEW M-Step AMO for one year Option Three Continue using 85% by 2024

45. SET MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES S.M.A.R.T. The Objective defines: (a)Who is the target population, (b)What do they need to achieve, (c)How (c)How will success be measured, and (d)When will they achieve it.

46. SET MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES 100% of all students will increase student growth RIT in Reading by 06.15.2017 as measured by the Spring, 2017 NWEA/MAP. Objective Option 1: Continue using Local data

47. SET MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES 42% of all students will demonstrate a proficiency in Claim 1: Concepts and Procedures in Mathematics by 06/16/2017 as measured by the Spring 2017 M-Step. Objective Option 2: Use NEW M-Step AMO for one year

48. SET MEASURABLE OBJECTIVES Objective Option 3: Continue using 85% by 2024 85% of all students will demonstrate a proficiency in all Claim areas in Mathematics by 06/14/2024 as measured by the Spring 2024 M-Step. NOTE: You must update the year from 2022 to 2024

49. TWO: OBJECTIVE WIZARD – WHO? 1. Who Is this an Objective for a population of students. (i.e. Focus Schools – Bottom 30%) OR Is this Objective for ALL students? Indicate which specific population

50. OBJECTIVE WIZARD – PROPORTION?

51. OBJECTIVE WIZARD – WHAT? Indicate a content area What kind of change are you measuring?

52. OBJECTIVE WIZARD – MEASURED BY? Indicate the tool you are using to determine your change.

53. OBJECTIVE WIZARD – BY WHEN? When will you be completed with measuring? Remember: This is for your 2016/2017 SIP

54. OBJECTIVE WIZARD – PREVIEW? Review your objective and Accept.

55. OBJECTIVE WIZARD – PREVIEW? Completed Objectives can be Edited from the Goal Details page

56. WHERE TO FIND YOUR AMO TARGETS HTTP://WWW.MICHIGAN.GOV/DOCUMENTS/MDE/DRAFT_MICHIGAN_ PROFICIENCY_TARGETS_2014-15_510922_7.XLSX HTTP://WWW.MICHIGAN.GOV/DOCUMENTS/MDE/DRAFT_MICHIGAN_ PROFICIENCY_TARGETS_2014-15_510922_7.XLSX Currently you will need to go into the BAA Secure Site to find the 2015 Draft School Scorecard Guide Go to PAGE 15, in the middle of the page find the hotlink that is listed above and click.

58. DEFINITIONS Handout

59. STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT 1 STRATEGY POOR ACTIVITY RICH Identify a high leverage and comprehensive core instructional strategy. THINK

60. STRATEGY What Staff members will do instructionally to help students achieve the measureable objective. All staff will implement the CITW ‘Creating the Environment for Learning’, non-negotiables into their Math instructional practice to increase student engagement and learning. This section will also include what and how you engaged in studying the research. Think Core Instruction FIRST

61. UPDATED MDE MTSS GRAPHIC

62. MACOMB’S MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT How Do Your School’s Current Practices Align with the Essential Elements of MTSS?

63. HOW DO OUR CURRENT REALITY PRACTICES ALIGN WITH ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF MTSS?

64. WHERE ARE WE AS A BUILDING REGARDING MTSS?

65. THREE: STRATEGY What Staff members will do instructionally to help students achieve the measureable objective.

66. STRATEGIES AND INTERVENTIONS TEACHER SHARING TEMPLATE

67. STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE INTENTIONAL PLAN FOR MONITORING ONE STRATEGY

68. Balanced Assessments & Balanced Data

69. Warren Woods School Assessment Planner

70. STRENGTHEN STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION BY INCLUDING ALL PHASES AT THE ACTIVITY LEVEL READINESSKNOWLEDGE and SKILLS OPPORTUNITY TO IMPLEMENT Staff will work together to create a common understanding and shared vision for how CITW will seamlessly integrate within the context of the building ’ s other initiatives. Teacher Learning Teams utilize the CITW Implementation Guide which identifies Critical Components and Non-negotiables required to understand as a school the expectations for implementation in their classrooms. Teachers will identify a colleague to engage in peer coaching during the implementation of math models as an instructional practice. ImplementMonitorEvaluate All teachers will implement the critical components to the Gold Standard for setting objectives and critical feedback. Monitors will use the Strategy Implementation Guide to focus their walk Throughs on the Creating an Environment for Learning non-negotiables of Classroom Instruction That Works Staff will use the Strategy Implementation Guide during their evaluation process to ensure they analyze their impact and fidelity of implementation the way the research intended.

71. MATRIX I ACTIVITY DEVELOPMENT

72. ACTIVITIES Tier I, II, or III Getting Ready, Implement, Monitor, Evaluate Activity Description

73. ED YES! RESULTS ED YES! SUMMARY TO DATA PLANNER TO MATRIX I

74. AFTER YOU HAVE COMPLETELY AND THOROUGHLY REVISITED, REVIEWED, AND REVISED. SLEEP ON IT!

75. 3 PLANS SIP GOALS PLAN PROFESSIONAL LEARNING PLAN DISTRICT TECHNOLOGY PLAN

76. How? School Improvement Team Implement the plan Monitor progress Adjust plan as necessary Evaluate results Report status to stakeholders Technology Team Implement the plan Monitor progress Adjust plan as necessary Evaluate results Report status to stakeholders Key Tasks

77. Select Goals, Objectives, Strategies & Activities you are including in your 2016-17 submission. START at the BOTTOM of EACH GOAL at the STRATEGY LEVEL and click there FIRST.

78. TITLE I TARGETED ASSISTANCE OR SCHOOL-WIDE DIAGNOSTIC 6

79. PROGRAM EVALUATION TOOL Impact: What was the strategy/program/initiative’s impact on students?

80. 80 Fidelity of Implementation Current Reality (Statements & Rubric Score) Data Program Evaluation Requires all 3 types of Activities Walk Through (Adult Implementation) Data Measurement (Student Achievement) Data Ready to Answer PET Question 5 in May Handout

81. 5. IMPACT: WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE STRATEGY/PROGRAM/INITIATIVE (S/P/I) ON STUDENTS SUB QUESTIONSTIPSCRITERIASCHOOL RESPONSE a. What is the evidence and what does it show regarding achievement of the measurable objective for all student when compared to baseline state and local data? a. Include data sources aligned to measurable objective for all students and draw conclusions from data a.All students in the S/P/I made progress towards the measurable objectives. (See Criteria document) b. What is the evidence and what does it show regarding achievement of the measurable objective for subgroups and their counterparts when compared to baseline state and local data? b. Include data sources aligned to objectives for each subgroup and draw conclusions from the data for each subgroup b. Subgroups within the strategy/program/initiati ve (See Criteria document) c. What is the evidence and what does it show regarding stakeholder (staff/students/parents) satisfaction with the results c. Include stakeholders involved, describe methods used to measure each stakeholder's c. All Stakeholders (See Criteria document) d. Were the objective for this S/P/I met? d. List stakeholders involved, describe methods used to measure each stakeholder’s satisfaction and specific data results for each stakeholder group d. Determine if the objectives were met (See Criteria document)

82. SUB QUESTIONSTIPSCRITERIASCHOOL RESPONSE a. What is the evidence and what does it say regarding whether this was the right s/p/I to meet your needs? a. Provide conclusion relating data to identified need a.Right S/P/I (See criteria document) b. What is the evidence and what does it show regarding whether the benefits of the S/P/I are sufficient to justify the resources it requires? b. Provide conclusion relating data to cost effectiveness b. Cost benefit of S/P/I (See criteria document) c. What adjustments, if any, might increase its impact while maintaining its integrity? c. Discuss the potential adjustments with rationale c. Potential adjustments to S/P/I (See criteria document) d. What is needed to maintain momentum? d. Discuss specific actions, resources, changes that will maintain momentum d. Maintain momentum of the S/P/I (See criteria document) e. How might these results inform the School Improvement Plan? e. Identify how results will impact measureable objective, strategies, and/or activities in the School Improvement Plan e. Results inform the School Improvement Plan (See criteria document) IMPACT CONCLUSION: SHOULD THE STRATEGY/PROGRAM/INITIATIVE (S/P/I) BE CONTINUED OR INSTITUTIONALIZED? YES/NO

83. STAGE ONE: GATHER STEP 2: COLLECTING SCHOOL DATA STEP 3: BUILD SCHOOL PROFILE Presenter Dr. Jennifer Parker-Moore Data Director D4SS MISchooldata.org GATHER Getting Ready Collect School Data Build School Profile

84. TEAM WORK TIME  Revisit, Review, Revise Update diagnostics  Revise to update Goals  Program Evaluation: Question 5 Conclusion  Plan what to bring back to share with SI team