Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarilynn Cross Modified over 8 years ago
1
INTRODUCTION Escherichia coli is a bacterial commensal of the intestinal microflora of a variety of animals, including humans. However, not all E. coli strains are harmless, as some are able to cause diseases in humans as well as in mammals and birds (Dho-Moulin & Fairbrother, 1999; Kaperet et al., 2004). Pathogenic E. coli strains fall into two categories: those that cause intestinal pathologies and those that cause extraintestinal pathologies. Antibiotic resistance in E. coli from human or animal origins has been increasingly reported worldwide, and it is a cause of concern. The fact that antimicrobial resistance genes are found on mobile genetics elements enables their rapid spread among the bacterial population (Guardabassi et al., 2004). The aim of this work was to study a collection of E. coli isolated from animal origins by investigating antibiotic susceptibilities, genes encoding antibiotic resistance and virulence factors as well as their phylogenetic groups. MATERIAL AND METHODS STRAINS: Thirty nine E.coli isolates were collected from healthy animals and food-products (feces, organs, meat) of animal origin in Tunisia. Isolates were identified by classical biochemical methods and by API20E system (BioMérieux, Marcy L'Etoile, France). ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTABILITY TEST: The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was used to determine sensitivity or resistance to antimicrobial agents, according to guidelines developed by the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI, 2010). The following antimicrobial agents were tested (μg/disc): ampicillin (10), amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (20/10), ceftazidime (30), cefotaxime (30), cefoxitin (30), gentamicin (10), kanamycin (30), streptomycin (10), tetracycline (30), nalidixic acid (30), ciprofloxacin (5), sulphonamides (200) and chloramphenicol (50). E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control strain. The double-disc synergy test with cefotaxime or ceftazidime in the proximity to amoxicillin–clavulanic acid was used for the screening of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL). GENES ENCODING ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE: genes encoding resistance against beta-lactams (blaSHV, blaSHV, blaCTX-M), fluoroquinolones (qnrA, qnrB, qnrS, qepA, and aac(6’)-Ib-cr), kanamycine (aph(3’)-Ia ), tetracycline (tetA, tetB, and tetC), sulfonamide (sul1, sul2, and sul3), streptomycin ( strA /strB, aadA) were detected by PCR. (Ben Sallem et al, 2013) VIRULENCE GENOTYPING: E. coli strains were investigated to determine the presence of various genes by using multiplex protocols described previously (Wu et al, 2007). The genes targeted were related to (i) bacterial adhesion (fimH, fasA, bfpA, bmaE, iha, nfaE, papC, papG alleles II and III, papG allele I, sfaS, tsh, eaeA); (ii) iron acquisition (fyuA, ireA, iutA); (iii) serum resistance (iss, traT); (iv) toxins and hemolysins (astA, cnf1/2, stx1, stx2, hlyA, cvaA, cdt, cdtB, ehxB, ehxA, eltA, etll, east1); (v) invasion (ibeA, ipaH); and (vi) the type III secretion system (escV). Miscellaneous gene (malX) were also included. PHYLOGENETIC GROUPING: The method described by Clermont et al. (2000) was used to classify strains into ECOR phylogenetic groups, namely A, B1, B2 and D. This method is based on a multiplex PCR for detection of three genetic markers, which are then used to assign the phylogenetic group based on a flowchart. Escherichia coli from healthy animals and food-products of animal origin as reservoir of antibiotic resistance and virulence Souhir Badi 1,2, Mohamed Salah Abbassi 1, Paola Cremonesi 3, Abdennaceur Hassen 2, Giulia Bignoli 3, Mario Luini 4, Bianca Castiglioni 3 1 Institut de la Recherche Vétérinaire de Tunisie, Bab Saadoun, Tunis, Tunisia; 2 Laboratoire de Traitement des Eaux Usées, Centre de Recherches et des Technologies des Eaux, Technopôle de Borj-Cédria, BP 901, 2050, Hammam-Lif, Tunisia; 3 Istituto di Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria, CNR, Lodi, Italy; 4 IZSLER, Lodi, Italy RESULTS ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTABILITY TEST Amongst 39 isolates high rates of resistance kanamycin (34, 87.1%) gentamicin (32, 82%) streptomycin (30, 76.9%) moderate rates of resistance amoxicilline (28, 71.7%) amoxicillin/clav-acide (26, 66.6%) low resistance tetracycline (11, 28.2%) trimethoprim/sulfomethoxazole (10, 25.6%) nalidixic acid (3, 7.7%) Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL) were not detected. GENES ENCODING ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE The tetA and tetB genes, encoding tetracycline resistance were detected in 8 and 7 isolates, respectively; however, phenotypic resistance was not detected in 3 tet- harboring isolates (Fig.1). Streptomycine resistance was encoded by strpA-strpB in 7 isolates amongst 30 strptomycin-resistant isolates, the aadA gene was not detected. Sulfonamide resistance was encoded by sul1, sul2, and sul3 genes in 1, 4, and 1 isolate, respectively (Fig.2). Interestingly, plasmid mediated quinolone resistance was detected in 6 isolates, where qnrS was in 3 isolates, qnrB in 2 isolates and qnrA in only one. VIRULENCE GENOTYPING 7 virulence genes were detected amongst various genes investigated by PCR (Fig.3), being (n: number of isolates, %) : fimH (34, 87.1% ), east1(16, 41%), traT (9, 23% ), fyuA (8, 20.5% ), cvaC (2, 5.1%), ipaH (1, 2.5%), and ibeA (1, 2.5% ). The majority of strains harbored only the fimH gene; however, combination of different genes were detected such as: fimH + fyuA + traT + east1 (7 isolates), fimH + ibeA+ traT + east1 (1 isolate), fyuA + traT + east1 (1 isolate), fimH + fyuA + east1 (1 isolate), fyuA + east1 (1 isolate), fimH + traT (1 isolate), fimH + east1 (5 isolate). PHYLOGENETIC GROUPING -The distribution of the phylogroups of 39 E. coli isolates showed that A (21 isolates, 53.8%) and B1 (16 isolates, 41%) phylogroups accounted for 94.8 % of the isolates. Isolates of the phylogenetic groups B2 (2 isolates, 5.1 %) and D (none) were rare. DISCUSSION -The finding of high rates of resistance against aminoglycosides and low resistance to tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfomethoxazole is uncommon. Indeed, high rates of resistance against tetracyclin and trimethoprim/sulfomethoxazole is atypical characteristic of E. coli of animal origin, however, low resistance to aminoglycosides has been mainly reported - ESBL producer-isolates were not detected. In Tunisia this phenotype remains rare in contrast to the global emergence of E. coli producing ESBLs from animal which constitute a real threat for human health. - Plasmid Mediated Quinolone Resistance (PMQR) were detected in 6 isolates. In our case, as reported worldwide, the predomiante genes remain of qnr-types. The occurrence of such PMQR can not be detected by antibiogramm but might select for mutations in gyrA and parC genes leading to high level or quinolone resistance -Most strains were considered as commensal because they belong to groups A and B1. -The predominance of genetic groups A and B1 compared to B2 and D was reported by Salhi et al. (2010) who found the following frequencies: 55% for group A, 18.3% for the B1 group, 17.4% for the B2 group and 9.2% for group D. By contrast, Ewers et al. (2007) showed the dominance of group A (46.1%) and B2 (35.1%) compared to group B1 (1.8%) and D (17%). - Virulotyping by PCR showed absence of stx1 and stx2 indicating the absence of STEC isolates, and the majority of detected genes are for adhesion, iron acquisition and serum resistance which are important for Intestinal colonization and survival during bacterial infection. -The ibeA gene, one of the important invasion-associated genes in neonatal meningitis Escherichia coli (NMEC), was found in one E. coli isolate, this finding is worrisome and highlight the possible dissemination of such very virulent isolate to human. References Ben Sallem et al, (2013). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 13:98-102. Clermont et al, (2000). Appl Env Microbiol, 66: 4555-4558; CLSI document M100-S20. Wayne Pennsylvania 2010; Ewers et al, (2007). Int J Med Microbiol. 297(3):163-76; Salehi et al, (2010). Trop Anim Health Prod 42: 1497-1504; Wu et al, (2007). Appl. Environ. Microbiol 73: 83- 91. Fig1. Representative gel electrophoresis of PCR gene tetB Fig2. Representative gel electrophoresis of PCR sul genes. Line1: 100 bp size marker, Lane 2, sul1 gene, Lanes 3 and 4 isolates with the gene sul2, Lane5, isolate with gene sul3. M 1 2 3 4 5 6 fimH 508 bp ibeA 170 bp Fig3. Representative gel electrophoresis of PCR virulence genes. LineM: 100 bp size marker, Lane 2, isolate harboring fimH and ibeA, Lanes 2 to 6 isolate harboring fimH
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.