1. PRESENTATION ON SAFE CORRIDOR DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM (SCDP) CORRIDORS (GUJARAT STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT-II) Government of Gujarat Project Implementation Unit, Roads and Buildings Department (Gujarat) August 2016

2. Contents 1.About SCDP 2.Bharuch-Dehgam Corridor 3.Characteristics of Corridor 4.Identified Accident Prone Spots 5.iRAP base line Star ratings 6.Approach to Design 7.Proposed Interventions 8.iRAP before and after Star ratings 9.Way Forward 10.Road User Satisfaction Survey 2

3. About SCDP 01 3

4. About Safe Corridor Development Program 4  Multi sectoral interventions will be implemented on high volume, high safety risk, 11 km Bharuch-Dehgam corridor to demonstrate road safety best practices.  The interventions by including comprehensive road safety measures including infrastructure safety designs, road traffic police support activities, public awareness/social media campaign and post-crash health care management aimed at reducing deaths particularly among vulnerable road users.  On the infrastructure countermeasures, improvement of corridor by specially focusing on vulnerable road users, to eliminate all high-risk sections by targeting of minimum 3 star rating (per iRAP program) applicable to all categories of road users.  Development of robust road safety management and monitoring and evaluation system.

5. Bharuch-Dehgam Corridor 02 5

6. BHARUCH – DEHGAM (SH-6) 6 KM 211+000 KM 200+000

7. ABOUT PROJECT HIGHWAY  Influence of rapid growth of urbanization of Bharuch Town Primary Connectivity Of Highway To Dahej Port Ribbon Development: Significant Growth In Development of land Beside Highway  Land Use Types: Residential, Commercial, Institutes, Hospitals, Industries  Challenge Is To Ensure Facility Of Good Service Level To Urban And Heavy Traffic Along With Desired Travel Speeds With Safety As A Priority. 7

8. Characteristics of Corridor 03 8

9. Characteristics of Corridor  Total Length: km 200+000 to km 211+000= 11km 200+000 to 206+00 Urban Section (Section-1) 206+000 to 211+000 Rural Section (Section-2)  Carriageway Width: Six lane carriage way with road side built up drain in urban section and open drain in rural section 9

10. 10 EXISTING CROSS SECTION KM 200+000 TO KM 206+000 6 – LANE WITH RCC DRAIN ON BOTH SIDES 10.5 M CARRIAGWAY FOR 3-LANES + 1.5 M PAVED SHOULDERS

11. EXISTING CROSS SECTION – RURAL SECTION 11 EXISTING CROSS SECTION KM 206+000 TO KM 211+350 6 – LANE DIVIDED FACILITY

12. Traffic on the Corridor 12 PARAMETERINDICATOR Traffic Volume Profile Section-1Section-II 42,139 Vehicles/60,974 PCU25,947 Vehicles/41,683 PCU Operational Speed Profile (Average Speed in Kmph) 2-Wheelers3-WheelersCarBusLCVTrucks 483963544744 Accident Investigations data (2009-2013) Helmet UsageAbout 20% Car seat belt usageAbout 15% Total Numbers of Accidents:138 Total nos of accidents at junction:117 (85%) Total nos of accidents at Mid-block:21 (15%)

13. Traffic Composition 13 Section-1 Section-II

14. IDENTIFIED ACCIDENT PRONE SPOTS (Based on accident data of the period 2009-2013) 04 14

15. ACCIDENT PRONE SPOTS 15 Sr. No. LocationChainageNo of AccidentsNo of Fatalities 1ABC junction202+360205 2Anand Restaurant201+64064 3Munshi School208+84074 4Narmada junction200+000113 5GNFC Township201+000113 6Jambusar bypass Junction207+440123 7Sherpura Village206+380112 8Shravan Junction204+63052 9Madhuli Junction203+70072 10Mipko Junction208+02061 11Dehgam211+09091

16. Accident statistics on the Corridor 16 Total Numbers of Accidents:138 Total nos of accidents at junction:117 (85%) Total nos of accidents at Mid-block:21 (15%) Total Accidents Accidents at Junctions Accidents at Mid block Total Fatal Accidents-42 Total Fatal Accidents-33Total Fatal Accidents-9

17. Nature of Accidents on the Corridor 17 Overall nature of Total nos of Accidents:138

18. Nature of Accidents at Junctions 18 Nature of accidents at junctions:117

19. Nature of Accidents at Midblock 19 Nature of accidents at mid-block:21

20. iRAP base line Star Ratings 05 20

21. iRAP BASE LINE STAR RATINGS 21 BaselineVehicle OccupantMotorcyclistPedestrianBicyclist Star Ratings Length (kms) Percent Length (kms) Percent Length (kms) Percent Length (kms) Percent 5 Stars00%0 0 0 4 Stars00%0 0 0 3 Stars6.330%00%0.52%00% 2 Stars9.947%10.851%17.784%10.450% 1 Star3.617%943%1.68%3.416% Not applicable 1.26%1.26%1.26%7.234% Totals21 100% 21 100% 21 100% 21 100%

22. Approach to Design 06 22

23. APPROACH  Understanding mobility and accessibility needs of users  Complementing roadway design  Intersection/junction design  Safety intervention for non- motorized transport  Detailed signage plan, pavement markings & safety appurtenances  Integrating civil and ITS designs  Compliance with i-RAP study 23

24. PARAMETERS FOR CIVIL DESIGNS 24

25. PARAMETERS FOR ITS DESIGNS 25  Collect, collate and store information on real time basis using effective communication technology  Effective management through decision support system  Provide efficient traffic rule enforcement violation detection through red lights, stop lights, speed violation detectors through surveillance cameras  Provide variable display system to inform important operational messages

26. PROPOSED ITS SYSTEM OVERVIEW 26 Central Control Room Variable Message Services Red-Light Violation Detection System Speed Violation Incident Detection System

27. 27 ITS SYSTEM OVERVIEW Road User Control Room Emergency Service Providers Enforcement Ambulance VMS messages Signal timings Pedestrian crossing signal timing VAHAN / SARTHI Challan Monitoring Camera Recording of Vehicle count data

28. Proposed Interventions 07 28

29. INTERVENTIONS PROPOSED FOR BHARUCH-DEHGAM SECTION  Junctions are redesigned and provided with control measures.  Regulation and control of pedestrian movements along and across the road  Installation of Traffic Signs as per IRC standards and specifications.  Traffic calming measures are proposed at appropriate places  Median barrier (W-beam Crash Barrier) is proposed throughout to control and regulate crossing of pedestrians and other traffic.  Street lighting posts are proposed in the median.  High mast lighting is proposed for important junctions  Junctions are redesigned and provided with control measures.  Regulation and control of pedestrian movements along and across the road  Installation of Traffic Signs as per IRC standards and specifications.  Traffic calming measures are proposed at appropriate places  Median barrier (W-beam Crash Barrier) is proposed throughout to control and regulate crossing of pedestrians and other traffic.  Street lighting posts are proposed in the median.  High mast lighting is proposed for important junctions 29

30. DESIGN INTERVENTIONS PROPOSED FOR BHARUCH-DEHGAM  Conflicts between vehicles and vulnerable road users are prevented.  To identify pedestrian crossings and enhance safety blinkers are proposed at crossings  Regulation and control measures at minor roads junctions.  Rumble stripes in form of transverse pavement markings are proposed to warn the presence of accident prone zones.  Delineation of Median Openings Roadside Objects and Carriageway Edges  Conflicts between vehicles and vulnerable road users are prevented.  To identify pedestrian crossings and enhance safety blinkers are proposed at crossings  Regulation and control measures at minor roads junctions.  Rumble stripes in form of transverse pavement markings are proposed to warn the presence of accident prone zones.  Delineation of Median Openings Roadside Objects and Carriageway Edges 30

31. 31 TYPE, NATURE OF ACCIDENTS AT ACCIDENT PRONE SPOTS AND PROPOSED INTERVENTIONS

32. 32 ABC JUNCTION

33. Nature of accidents at ABC Junction 33 Total nos of Accidents:20Total Major injuries:6 Total Minor injuries:14Total Fatalities:5 Total Fatal Accidents-5

34. EXISTING CONDITION OF ABC JUNCTION (CH 202+350) 34

35. PROPOSED CIVIL WORK INTERVENTIONS AT ABC JUNCTION (CH 202+350) 35 Enhancement of Junction Signage's and pavement markings as per Standard Speed hump to be proposed on side roads Proposed Signalized junction Proposed High mast for night time safety

36. PROPOSED ITS INTERVENTIONS AT ABC JUNCTION (CH 202+350) 36

37. 37 MADHULI JUNCTION

38. Nature of accidents at Madhuli Junction 38 Total nos of Accidents:7Total Major injuries:3 Total Minor injuries:3Total Fatalities:2 Total Fatal Accidents-2

39. EXISTING CONDITION OF MADHULI JUNCTION 39

40. PROPOSED CIVIL WORK INTERVENTIONS AT MADHULI JUNCTION 40 Enhancement of Junction through channelization and redesigning Signage's and pavement markings as per Standard Access roads with speed hump and signs Proposed blinkers for warning Proposed High mast for night time safety

41. 41 ANAND RESTAURANT

42. Nature of accidents at Annand Restaurant Junction 42 Total nos of Accidents:6Total Major injuries:3 Total Minor injuries:3Total Fatalities:4 Total Fatal Accidents-4

43. CIVIL WORKS INTERVENTIONS AT ANAND RESTAURANT (CH 201+640) 43 Optimization of median opening Pedestrian crossings with blinkers Signage's and pavement markings as per Standard Access roads with speed hump and signs Anand Restaurant

44. 44 NARMADA JUNCTION

45. NARMADA JUNCTION (CH 200+000) 45 Total nos of Accidents:11Total Major injuries:6 Total Minor injuries:3Total Fatalities:3

46. PROPOSED CIVIL WORK INTERVENTIONS AT NARMADA JUNCTION (CH 200+000) 46 Access of bus stand is proposed to be relocated Signage's and pavement markings as per Standard Proposed new bus stop Proposed blinkers for warning Channelization of Junction

47. 47 MUNSHI SCHOOL

48. CIVIL WORKS INTERVENTIONS NEAR MUNSHI SCHOOL JUNCTION (CH 208+840) 48 Enhancement of Junction by providing waiting lane Signage's and pavement markings as per Standard Realignment of Access roads with speed hump and signs Pedestrian crossing with blinkers Optimization of median opening Proposed footpath Total nos of Accidents:7Total Major injuries:0 Total Minor injuries:5Total Fatalities:4

49. 49 SHRAVAN JUNCTION

50. CIVIL WORKS INTERVENTIONS AT SHRAVAN JUNCTION (CH 204+640) 50 Enhancement of Junction Signage's and pavement markings as per Standard Speed hump to be proposed on side roads Proposed Signalized junction Proposed High mast for night time safety Total nos of Accidents:5Total Major injuries:3 Total Minor injuries:1Total Fatalities:2

51. 51 SHERPURA VILLAGE

52. CIVIL WORKS INTERVENTIONS NEAR SHERPURA VILLAGE (CH 206+300 TO 206+700) 52 Optimization of median opening Signage's and pavement markings as per Standard Realignment of Access roads with speed hump and signs Proposed High mast for night time safety Total nos of Accidents:11Total Major injuries:8 Total Minor injuries:2Total Fatalities:2

53. 53 INTERVENTIONS NEAR RESIDENTIAL AREA

54. 54 CIVIL WORK INTERVENTIONS NEAR RESIDENTIAL AREA (CH 204+100 TO 204+300)

55. iRAP before and after Star ratings 08 55

56. iRAP BASE LINE STAR RATINGS 56 Baseline data (Before design) BaselineVehicle OccupantMotorcyclistPedestrianBicyclist Star RatingsLength (kms)PercentLength (kms)PercentLength (kms)PercentLength (kms)Percent 5 Stars00%0 0 0 4 Stars00%0 0 0 3 Stars6.330%00%0.52%00% 2 Stars9.947%10.851%17.784%10.450% 1 Star3.617%943%1.68%3.416% Not applicable1.26%1.26%1.26%7.234% Totals21 100% 21 100% 21 100% 21 100% After design DesignVehicle OccupantMotorcyclistPedestrianBicyclist Star RatingsLength (kms)PercentLength (kms)PercentLength (kms)PercentLength (kms)Percent 5 Stars4.923%00%0 0 4 Stars7.737%4.220%00%0 3 Stars8.440%14.870%0.31%9.746% 2 Stars00%210%20.497%524% 1 Star00%0 0.31%00% Not applicable00%0 0 6.330% Totals21100%21100%21100%21100%

57. Way Forward 09 57

58. Way forward  Looking to the results of iRAP star rating after design, pedestrians are still under 2 star rating.  We are trying to add some more pedestrian interventions / pedestrian facilities to increase the pedestrian rating from 2 star to minimum 3 star.  Looking to the results of iRAP star rating after design, pedestrians are still under 2 star rating.  We are trying to add some more pedestrian interventions / pedestrian facilities to increase the pedestrian rating from 2 star to minimum 3 star. 58

59. Road User Satisfaction Survey 09 59

60. Road User Satisfaction Survey for Umreth-Vasad and Kapadvanj-Ladvel corridor 60  As a post construction activity, take up user satisfaction surveys for all the road improvement works involved in the Project (GSHP-II)  Satisfaction of Road Users after completion of construction.  Overall Satisfaction level of KAPADVANJ – LADVEL road. Indicator Highly dissatisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Somewhat satisfied Highly satisfied Don't Know Not applicable Engineering Indicator0.00% 0.55%16.96%81.93%0.56%0.00% Road Furniture0.27%0.0%0.69%13.47%69.58%15.97%0.0% Wayside Amenities0.0%1.11%0.56%11.67%86.67%0.0% Road Safety0.0%0.4%0.8%15.7%81.8%1.9%0.0% Road Environment4.07%5.19%8.15%29.44%53.15%0.0% Economic Indicator0.0%1.67%2.96%24.07%46.11%5.92%19.25%

61. Road User Satisfaction Survey for Umreth-Vasad and Kapadvanj-Ladvel corridor 61  Overall Satisfaction level of Umreth-Vasad road. Indicator Highly dissatisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Somewhat satisfied Highly satisfied Don't Know Not applicable Engineering Indicator 3.80%1.02%0.59%12.81%81.06%0.71%0.0% Road Furniture 0.58%0.03%1.16%13.57%75.58%0.0%9.06% Wayside Amenities 0.61%0%0.37%4.3%94.35%0.0%0.37% Road Safety0.0% 0.21%4.79%92.67%2.33%0.0% Road Environment 0.82%0.7%2.99%36.98%58.15%0.37%0.0% Economic Indicator 0.0%0.04%1.06%9.25%46.69%1.47%46.48%

62. Thank you… 62