Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClemence McKinney Modified over 8 years ago
1
Technical Specification for Fax over IPX service Madrid February 2010
2
State of the art of i3F document General prerequisites Detailed technical guidelines Testing recommendations Target technical guidelines Testing recommendations Drafting Group TP R&D TP Study, SIP Forum Ongoing: Slide 3 Survey Valid standards SIP Forum docs. Started: Slide 4 New T.38 version SDP extension Other standards, SIP Forum Problem Statement. Initial list: Slide 5
3
I. General prerequisites 1)Bandwidth calculation - to be prepared by TP R&D 2)VBD requirements – need SDP offer when V.152 is not supported. 3)Redundancy – calculation method for given PL does not exist – test scenario with network QoS degradation is to be prepared (see 4b). 4)QoS parameters a.COS marking – as for voice b.PL measurement question in the survey c.Delay impact on echo suppressors/cancellers – network test to be prepared d.Delay between command and answer – max. RTD measurement vs. terminal timer (network and equipment tests). 5)Gateway resources planning – tbd. on the basis of vendor documentation + test scenario. (general tip: fax relay=G.729) 6)Echo control – echo suppressors/cancellers behaviour (see 4c). 7)Transport – UDPTL recommended.
4
II. Detailed technical guidelines 1)Survey to determine „common denominator” 2)Call setup/Switchover – graphs prepared to be verified. 3)Call flows and SDP O/A – on the basis of SIP forum cooperation. 4)Support of “user=phone” string in T.38 switchover – test scenario 5)T.38 call parameters – first recommendation delivered, to be clarified on the basis of SIP Forum „Problem statement”. 6)Bandwidth extension after t.38 switchover – initial signalling =DTMF, call completed at lower speed.+ SIP Forum „Problem Statement”. 7)Indication for switching to fax upspeed mode into SIP re-INVITE to VBD – vbd=yes (or other SDP parameters?) 8)Encryption – waiting for draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-07.txt for UDPTL 9)Timing and synchronization – problem appears also in TDM ?? 10)ECM – proposal to default disable by gateway 11)SG3 fax guidelines – fallback (SIP Forum).
5
III. Target technical guidelines Echo control - ITU-T Recommendation V.152 “Amendment 1”, 03/2009 Call Control Protocol - SDSPCapNeg and SDPMediaCapNeg in T.38 version, July 2010, based on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation- 10.txt, SIP Forum SDP document. T.38 fax call parameters, switchover possibilities, ECM, SG3 fax guidelines - T.38 version, July 2010, SIP Forum call flow document. Fax only direct T.38 call – SIP Forum SDP document. Encryption RFC XXXX on the basis of draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-07.txt for UDPTL SRTP for RTP stack ??? for TCP stack. SIP Forum new „Problem Statement” – identification of new cases.
6
IV. TESTING Equipment tests Testing terminals by PSTN call Time-out for command – answer delay testing T.38 conformity testing for Gateways, ATAs, IAFs Resource capacity testing Network tests Testing VoIP connections IP tests, ping, RTD, jitter, packet loss… Acoustic level & loss between analog terminals (gateway FXS ports) Echo suppression testing (enable delay) Echo cancellation testing (disable delay after ANSam) Interoperability tests Switchover procedures testing Support of “user=phone” string in T.38 switchover. Transmission testing Redundancy level testing for network QoS degradation. Transmission speed registration. Clock synchronization testing for VBD ?? Performance testing
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.