Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWilliam Barnett Modified over 8 years ago
1
Effects of Viscosity on Bead Shape of Polydimethylsiloxane Fluid Flowing down a Fiber VICTORIA GERSHUNY JEFF WALTER AND AMMON WASHBURN
2
Motivation Effectiveness of: Removal of pollutants from a fluid Saturation of liquid with gas Transport of materials through slurry flow Slurry flow http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/slurry - transport-velocity-d_236.html
3
Previous studies Mean velocity of the fluid flowing down a fiber increases, the mean minimum and maximum droplet diameter increase, (Friedman & Miller 1941; Gr¨unig et al. 2013, 2010). Mean velocity is greater as liquid flow rate increases, (Gr¨unig et al. 2010). Greater fiber diameter leads to greater bead diameter, (Gr¨unig et al. 2013). Distance from the inlet of the fluid increases, the fluid velocity increases, (Wehinger et al. 2013).
4
Layers of fluid Boundary layer - closest to the fiber Internal layers - surrounded by fluid Outer layer - in contact with the air Forces Boundary layer - adhesion to the fiber, gravity, and shearing from the adjacent layer Internal layers - gravity and shearing from adjacent layers on both sides of the fluid Outer layer - gravity, shearing from one adjacent layer, and negligible adhesion to the air particles
5
Interaction Between Different Forces
6
Experimental Set-Up
7
Measurements Steady state - moment when the distance between drops was at a minimum with respect to time Measurements: Minimum bead diameter Maximum bead diameter Bead to bead separation
8
Bead Shape
9
Min and Max Diameter
10
Distance Between Beads 1000 cst could not be included because of non reliability Three neighboring drops at steady state had a 47.2% difference in their separation
11
Velocity
13
Reynolds Number WE NEED TO FILL THIS IN BUT I DON’T HAVE THE MOST RECENT VERSION SO IM NOT SURE WHAT TO SAY
14
Conclusions Bead diameter and the difference between the minimum and maximum bead diameter increased for increased viscosity Minimum bead diameter did not vary significantly Viscosity affected the inner layers of fluid, but did not significantly affect the boundary layers Bead separation decreased with increased viscosity Reynolds number decreased with increased viscosity
15
Future Studies Collect data closer to inlet Measure fluid velocity experimentally Use a wider range of viscosities
16
References Crowe, C. T., J. D. Schwarzkopf, M. Sommerfeld, and Y. Tsuji. Multiphase flows with droplets and particles. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2012. Print. Friedman, S. J., and C. O. Miller. "Liquid films in the viscous flow region. "Industrial & Engineering Chemistry 33.7 (1941): 885-891. Grünig, J., S ‐ J. Kim, and M. Kraume. "Liquid film flow on structured wires: Fluid dynamics and gas ‐ side mass transfer." AIChE Journal 59.1 (2013): 295-302. Grünig, J., T. Skale, and M. Kraume. "Liquid flow on a vertical wire in a countercurrent gas flow." Chemical Engineering Journal 164.1 (2010): 121-131. Hattori K, Ishikawa M, Mori YH. Strings of liquid beads for gas-liquid contact operations. AIChE J. 1994;40:1983–1992. Munson, Bruce Roy, and T. H. Okiishi. Fundamentals of fluid mechanics. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons, 2009. Print. Sigma Aldrich. “Silicone oil.” Dow Corning Corporation: Midland, Michigan, 1998. Smolka, Linda B., Justin North, and Bree K. Guerra. "Dynamics of free surface perturbations along an annular viscous film." Physical Review E 77.3 (2008): 036301. Wehinger, Gregor D., et al. "Numerical simulation of vertical liquid-film wave dynamics." Chemical Engineering Science 104 (2013): 934-944.
17
Thank you for listening And a thank you to Dr. Tabor and Bob Reinking
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.