1. Partnership Overview March 2014

2. Global Food Safety Partnership Breaking New Ground First partnership supported by the World Bank combining public and private money (multi-donor trust fund -- MDTF) and public and private implementation Formally established December 2012 at the first GFSP conference in Paris

3. SAFER FOOD STRONGER ECONOMIES HEALTHIER WORLD Objectives

4. 5-year initial capacity building work plan with defined activities, supported by the MDTF In parallel, use the experience to learn and develop a new cooperation model for future collaboration Dual Approach

5.  Harmonization of Training  Improving Outcomes from Training  Ensuring Best Practices for Monitoring and Evaluation  Cross-sector Coordination & Collaboration  Developing a Common Baseline for Training Standards GFSP Secretariat Multi Donor Trust Fund Funds for: Industry National Governments International Organizations Universities NGOs Other Stakeholders Service Providers Contributions Other inputs Advisory Working Groups Donor Advisory Council Preparing for the future Operational Structure

6.  Implemented by contracted and in-kind service providers  Advisory Working Groups (WGs)  IT/Learning Systems  Food Safety Technical  Communication  Monitoring and Evaluation  Combined WG co-chairs meetings with IOs and Donors (Coordination Committee)  Donor’s Advisory Council and Leadership Group  Secretariat (hosted at World Bank) Organization & Management

7. Donor’s Advisory Council GFSP Secretariat has convened a Donor’s Advisory Council (DAC) to provide an additional mechanism for direct consultation and advice on the Partnership. The DAC has been established to advise on: – High level stakeholder engagement – Fund raising – Inputs to the Secretariat regarding funding priorities (topics, countries, sectors) – Emerging issues The 1 st DAC meeting was held during the 2 nd Annual GFSP Conference in Singapore (Dec 2013).

8. Initial contributions US$ 1 m Program design and pilots World Bank US$ 1.2m Advisory Working Groups Multi-Donor Trust Fund US$ 45-50 m (pending) Global scaling up Financing Sources

9. Governments (Donors in red) Canada Denmark Netherlands FSANZ United States Governments (Pilot countries) China Indonesia Malaysia Vietnam Zambia Multilateral & International Organizations FAO Network of Aquaculture Centers in Asia-Pacific (NACA) UNIDO WHO World Bank/IFC Industry and Associations Mars Inc. Waters Corporation Cargill Food Industry Asia (FIA) General Mills Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) Current Partners

10. Universities, NGOs and In-kind and Implementing Partners Food and Environment Research Agency (FERA), UK DEFRA Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) Global Aquaculture Alliance/Responsible Aquaculture Foundations (GAA/RAF) GLOBALG.A.P International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) International Union of Food Science and Technology (IUFoST) Massey University Michigan State University Network of Aquaculture Centers of Asia-Pacific (NACA) Orange House Current Partners cont…

11. Advisory Process Stakeholder feedback on GFSP progress and issues Advisory Working Groups GFSP Secretariat Issues and Opportunities Feedback on current work program Advice sought Advice Provided Decisions on: Projects Activities Funding

12. GFSP 1 st Current Work Plan GFSP Secretariat reviewed Roadmap and 5-Year Plan and revised 1 st Year Plan for mid-2013 to mid-2014. The Roadmap describes three pillars of engagement by the GFSP: Training Program Implementation Global and Regional Scaling up Program Facilitation

13. #1 Training Program APEC/FSCF+ Supply chain management Incident management Laboratory competency Risk analysis Food safety regulatory system On-farm quality assurance #2 Global Scaling up Country Capacity Building Needs Assessments  East Asia  South Asia  Latin America  East Europe & Central Asia  Africa  Middle East  “Responsive activities” #3 Program Facilitation Learning Platform Open Education Resources Curriculum Development Food Safety Technical Monitoring and Evaluation GFSP Secretariat Communication

14. Country Selection Criteria Country policy environment Potential for scaling up APEC countries Public-Private commitment Partner priorities and cost sharing Countries are selected using criteria based on each category

15. Phased implementation based on available funding Currently about US$2M available in multi-donor trust fund Enough to implement 40% of Year 1 workplan (total budget: US$5M) 1 st Year Workplan Implementation

16. Activities 2013-2014 GFSP activities recently completed, underway, or planned for implementation during 2013 and Q1,2 of 2014 – Supply Chain Management (SCM) – On-farm Quality Assurance and GAP – Food Safety Incident Management – Laboratory Competency – Risk Analysis - Risk assessment module – Food Safety Regulatory Systems

17. Supply Chain Management China selected (due to importance of food safety, strong interest) to pilot the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) training module The training was supported by Michigan State University (MSU), scaling up the HACCP program first delivered Beijing June 2012 HACCP module delivered in Vietnam, Malaysia, and China (Shanghai) in May/June 2013 180 representatives from local industries and relevant government agencies Modules being translated into Chinese, Vietnamese, Turkish and Russian languages, and are now available freely for training providers

18. GFSP Food Safety/HACCP Curriculum Introduction Module I: Good Manufacturing Practices Section 1-1: Establishment: Design and Facilities Section 1-2: Control of Operation Section 1-3: Storage and Transportation Section 1-4: Product Information and Consumer Awareness Section 1-5: Training Module II: Sanitation and Hygiene Section 2-1: Cleaning and Disinfection Section 2-2: Personal Hygiene

19. GFSP Food Safety/HACCP Curriculum Module III: Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points Section 3-1: Introduction to HACCP Section 3-2: Preliminary Steps Section 3-3: Principle 1 – Conduct a Hazard Analysis Section 3-4: Principle 2 – Identify Critical Control Points Section 3-5: Principle 3 – Determine Critical Limits Section 3-6: Principle 4 – Determine Monitoring Procedures Section 3-7: Principle 5 – Determine Corrective Actions Section 3-8: Principle 6 – Determine Verification Procedures Section 3-9: Principle 7 – Record-Keeping Procedures

20. Beijing 2012 – APEC/FSCF PTIN & GFSP Blended learning program – online and face-to-face. First pilot of the GFSP Food Safety / HACCP curriculum. Translation to Chinese by local partners. Three-week eLearning phase (delivered in Chinese). Pre- and post-assessments of participant knowledge against learning objectives. Six-day in-country experiential phase. – Facility visits – Skills development – Written HACCP plans Participants from government, industry and academia.

21. Beijing 2012 – APEC/FSCF PTIN & GFSP

22. Shanghai China Training Programme June 2013

23. Aquaculture Food Safety Training Good Aquaculture Practices (GAqP) training module was translated into Bahasa Indonesian and delivered by the Network of Aquaculture Centers in Asia-Pacific (NACA) to 45 participants in Indonesia (June 2013). The GFSP has partnered with the Global Aquaculture Alliance (GAA) – an international non-profit trade association – to refine the module further and begin roll-out globally, beginning with a regional training of trainers in Malaysia.

24. Aquaculture Food Safety Training 5-module curriculum developed – focus on food safety during aquaculture production and post-harvest handling of aquaculture products – Module 1: Introduction – Food safety issues in aquaculture – Module 2: Food safety hazards – Module 3: Food safety practices for aquaculture production – Module 4: Ensuring food safety in post harvest handling and processing – Module 5: Food safety management systems – HACCP

25. Aquaculture Training Programme Indonesia June 2013

26. On-farm Quality Assurance and Good Agricultural Practice The GFSP Secretariat is in discussions with organizations reviewing various GAP programs to determine the best approaches Workshop planned for early 2014 to refine content of training modules, with roll out to several countries later in the year It is expected that the Food Safety Technical Working Group (FSTWG,) will provide inputs on GAP priorities

27. Food Safety Incident Management Modules are being developed to support training on incident management Under FSCF an APEC-wide incident management network is being established Network will provide critical information in the event of an incident to assist in management of incidents in real time

28. Laboratory Competency GFSP supporting the formulation of a laboratory capacity building strategy to guide work in this area Scoping of training activities currently available underway and paper in preparation on the current status of laboratory capacity building internationally Further steps involve establishing an Expert Group to guide the facilitation of capacity building activities and scaling up of activities currently underway.

29. Risk Assessment Consultant recruited to identify current training programs for chemical risk assessment, and to make recommendations regarding the development of a comprehensive training program for use globally A small expert group has been established to advise on development of the module The Group is chaired by Dr Paul Brent, Food Standards Australia New Zealand. The Expert Group will report its progress and recommendations to the GFSP Secretariat through the FSTWG

30. Food Safety Regulatory Systems A regulatory systems training module will be developed by a service provider, to be selected competitively, followed by pilot delivery of the module as a training of trainers (country and timing to be identified). In addition, an export certification workshop for APEC countries was held in April 2012 (Greenbelt, Maryland), sponsored by USDA. A follow on workshop with broader participation is planned for 2014.

31. Needs Assessment and Scaling Up National food safety needs assessment – Workshop December 2012 Paris – Assessment methodology developed (FAO plus WHO) – First pilot in Zambia begun October 2013 Scaling up of the assessments being considered for – China (1-2 provinces) – India (2-3 states) – Chile or other country in same region – Indonesia – Azerbaijan – Tajikistan Zambia initial findings presented at the 2 nd Annual GFSP Conference in Singapore in December 2013.

32. Needs Assessment and Scaling Up In China GFSP plans to make available a new capacity building needs assessment toolkit at the national level and in 1-2 provinces Part of the broader World Bank Group (World Bank and International Financial Corporation) dialogue on food safety with government and industry in China Dialogue is developing now - IFC mission recently completed Further WB/IFC/GFSP mission planned for March 2014 Specific actions will be agreed based on the outcomes of the mission

33. New (Market Response) Activities Proposals for new activities that are consistent with the GFSP Five Year Plan and address the priority areas are welcome GFSP Secretariat encourages activities through public-private-academic sector collaboration where possible GFSP would facilitate the establishment of new activities depending on need and available resources May include expert consultations, workshops, delivery of training modules, reports, and pilot initiatives

34. Individual Country Approach 1.Country selection by regions 2.Carry out national food safety capacity building needs assessments + piloting delivery of some training materials 3.Develop tailored country action plans covering a)National food safety control system b)Agribusiness and value chains c)On-farm food safety – GAP d)Auditing and certification training

35. GFSP Coordinated Approach for Greater Impact Separate Independent (variably linked) actions Collective and Cohesive Approach (More Collaboration, Coordination, Communication, Connection)

36. The Global Food Safety Partnership  Reduce risks to consumers and businesses  Improve skills, efficiencies and public health  Create economic opportunity