Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Policy Roundtable September 14, 2016 Denver, Colorado.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Policy Roundtable September 14, 2016 Denver, Colorado."— Presentation transcript:

1 Policy Roundtable September 14, 2016 Denver, Colorado

2 Protecting Stable Patients from Non-Medical Switching Larry R. Lanier President, State Advocacy & Community Outreach National Patient Advocate Foundation

3 About NPAF/PAF  The National Patient Advocate Foundation (NPAF) serves as the patient voice for patients with chronic, debilitating illnesses who need access to affordable, high quality health care.  NPAF, a 501(c)4, is the partner organization and advocacy affiliate to Patient Advocate Foundation, a 501(c)3, which provides direct case management services to patients who have trouble affording or accessing treatments.  NPAF helps translate the individual experiences of PAF patients to federal and state legislative or regulatory policies.

4 Most Common Patient Issues (from the PAF Patient Data Analysis Report, 2015) 1.Lack of access to prescription treatments (such as): Barriers through Utilization Review (such as prior authorization, step therapy, and non-medical switching Out of pocket costs 2.Medical Debt 3.Lack of transportation to treatments

5 Snapshot of Patients Served in 2015

6 Top 5 Pharmaceutical Access Issues by Income

7 Non-Medical Switching: Myths vs. Facts

8

9 Studies Current Medical Research and Opinion - 1 April 2016 Value in Health Journal – May 2015

10 Current Protections  Colorado – Recently released voluntary guidelines instructing insurers not to enact coverage changes mid-year.  Texas – Continuity of Care (CoC) law the partially protects against mid-year non-medical switching.  Washington – If an insurer removes medication for anything other than safety, the patients will only be able to access their original prescription through the insurer’s substituion process; does not prevent the insurer from raising OOP costs in the middle of the plan year.  Nevada – adopted Dec 2015, a health benefit plan cannot remove a drug its formlary, or raise OOP costs in the middle of the plan year.

11 Good Policy Language Except as otherwise stated, a health benefit plan which provides coverage for prescription drugs and uses a formulary that has been approved by the Commissioner, shall not: (a) Remove a prescription drug from the formulary; or (b) Move a drug to a tier with a larger deductible, copayment, or coinsurance during the plan year for which the formulary was approved by the Commissioner. The Nevada Regulation

12

13 Non-Medical Switching Activity in States 2016  Introduced legislation 2016  California (CoC)  Connecticut  Florida  Massachusetts  Washington  Considering legislation 2017 / Forming coalitions  California  Colorado  Connecticut  Florida  Illinois  Michigan  New Jersey  New York  Pennsylvania  Tennessee  Texas  Washington

14 Model Act No. 22 - NAIC  National Association of Insurance Commissioners have convened a workgroup to review and consider revisions to the Health Carrier Prescription Drug Benefit Management Model Act (#22) to address issues related to:  a) transparency, accuracy and disclosure regarding prescription drug formularies and formulary changes during a policy year;  b) accessibility of prescription drug benefits using a variety of pharmacy options; and  c) tiered prescription drug formularies and discriminatory benefit design.

15 As Patient Advocates… We ask that policy be enacted that: Preserves the patient-provider relationship Ensures that out-of-pocket costs are transparent Honors the contract Bottom line: Patients deserve the health plan they signed up for.

16 Thank you! www.npaf.orgwww.npaf.org | www.patientadvocate.orgwww.patientadvocate.org @NPAF_tweets | National Patient Advocate Foundation


Download ppt "Policy Roundtable September 14, 2016 Denver, Colorado."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google