Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byArchibald Manning Modified over 8 years ago
1
GEO Disaster Resilience Breakout Group GEO Work Programme Symposium 2016 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS/NOAA 3 May 2016 Geneva, Switzerland
2
Background –The GEO Disaster Resilience SBA starts a new phase in the framework of Post- Sendai and other major global processes, such as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Purpose of the Breakout Session Bardarbunga erupting in 2014. Photo credit: M Parks Topic –Identify the role of disaster activities in the global framework; how can the GEO community contribute in a useful way; where is GEO unique
3
Identify key medium- and long-term objectives of the Disaster Resilience SBA Address and identify user needs (data, GCI functionalities), policies, priorities and partners for existing Community Activities and GEO Initiatives; map global activities and actors Have a clear view on contribution, deliverables, organization, and timeline of GEO activities culminating in the development of a consolidated SBA scenario/roadmap for reference for GEO Members and Participating Organizations to plan and implement future actions Identify new activities to be included in 2017-2019 Work Programme Objectives
4
How do we identify partners and priorities? OUTCOME: Identify Partners and Priorities How do we shape the activities of the Disaster Resilience SBA to address these priorities? OUTCOME: Establish a Roadmap of user requirements (data, GCI functionalities, etc.) What will specifically be delivered by GEO? OUTCOME: Identify Deliverables and Timeline What will be efficient partnership/cooperation mechanisms? OUTCOME: List of Potential Partnerships and Engagement Mechanisms Key Questions and Expected Outcomes
5
Disasters SBA - Then (2005-2015) Build on Past Successes
6
Disasters: Reducing loss of life and property from natural and human-induced disasters: Disaster losses can be reduced through observations relating to hazards such as: wildland fires; volcanic eruptions; earthquakes; tsunamis; subsidence; landslides; avalanches; ice; floods; extreme weather; and pollution events. GEOSS implementation will bring a more timely dissemination of information through better coordinated systems for monitoring, predicting, risk assessment, early warning, mitigating, and responding to hazards at local, national, regional, and global levels. Disasters SBA - Then Disasters Strategic Target (2009): Enable the global coordination of observing and information systems to support all phases of the risk management cycle associated with hazards (mitigation and preparedness, early warning, response, and recover). DI-01: Informing Risk Management and Disaster Reduction C1: Disaster Management Systems C2: Geohazards Monitoring, Alert, and Risk Assessment C3: Regional End-to-End Systems C4: Global Wildfire Information System C5: Foster Utilization of Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Data for all Phases of Disaster Risk Management 2 Year Targets 6 Year Targets 10 Year Targets
7
Disaster Resilience SBA - Now (2016)
8
Disaster Resilience: By increasing capacity to prepare, forecast, mitigate, manage and recover from disasters; in order to achieve a substantial reduction of risk and losses of life and property through an understanding of disaster risk brought by maintaining and strengthening in situ and remotely-sensed Earth and climate observations while enhancing the access to, and the sharing and use of, data and information obtained through such observations. Disaster Resilience SBA Now
9
Disaster Resilience SBA - Now
10
Disaster-relevant SDGs Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts Build resilient infrastructure Make cities and human settlements safe, resilient, and sustainable The 2030 Plan for Global Action, Article 76: “We will promote transparent and accountable scaling-up of appropriate public-private cooperation to exploit the contribution to be made by a wide range of data, including Earth observation and geo-spatial information, while ensuring national ownership in supporting and tracking progress.”
11
“The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction calls for enhanced access to, sharing of, and use of non-sensitive data and information, communications and geospatial ands pace- based technologies and related services through international cooperation, as well as continued and strengthened in-situ and remotely sensed Earth and climate observations.” Summit on Climate Change and Disaster Management Sep 2015 Disasters and Climate Change - Connection
12
Sendai Framework Scope and Purpose: apply to the risk of small-scale and large-scale, frequent and infrequent, sudden and slow onset disasters, caused by natural or manmade hazards as well as related environmental, technological, and biological hazards and risks. Expected Outcome: substantial reduction of disaster risk and losses in lives, livelihoods, and health and in the economic, physical, social, cultural and environmental assets of persons, businesses, communities, and countries
13
Sendai Framework Goal: Prevent new and reduce existing disaster risk through the implementation of integrated and inclusive economic, structural, legal, social, health, cultural, educational, environmental, technological, political and institutional measures that prevent and reduce hazard exposure and vulnerability to disaster, increase preparedness for response and recovery, and thus strengthen resilience. Accomplish this goal through four Priorities for Action in support of seven Targets Priority 1: Understanding disaster risk Priority 2: Strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk Priority 3: Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience Priority 4: Enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response and to “Build Back Better”
14
GI-08: GEO Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories (GSNL) Additional Information will be presented Hawai’i Supersite Objectives to enable the global scientific community open, full and easy access to a variety of space- and ground-based data, focusing over selected, high risk areas of the world: the Supersites and the Natural Laboratories; to promote advancements in geohazard science over the selected sites; to report scientific results relevant to geohazard assessment to authoritative bodies and other stakeholders, supporting informed decision-making in DRM; to innovate technologies, processes, and communication models, enhancing data sharing, global scientific collaboration, and capacity building in geohazard science. Leadership: Stefano Salvi (INGV-Italy) Contributors: Scientific Advisory Committee, CEOS Data Coordination Team, and Supersite Managers totaling over 120 persons
15
GI-09: Global Wildfire Information System Objective Build on the ongoing activities of the European Forest Fire Information System (EFIS), the GTOS GOFC-GOLD Fire Implementation Team, the associated Regional Networks, complementing existing, related activities that are ongoing around the world, with respect to wildfire information gathering Establish and further develop a prototype Global Wildfire Information System providing harmonized fire information Leadership: Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz (EC-JRC) Contributors: GTOS (GOFC-GOLD), Canada (CFS), USA, China, Japan, South Africa (CSIR), ESA, NASA
16
GI-16: -DARMA = Data Assess for Risk Management Objective To address the priorities of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015- 2030 using Earth observations (EO) To facilitate the sustained provision of accurate EO-based risk information products and services to national and local decision-makers in political and socio-economic sectors, to implement disaster risk reduction and resilience measures during all disaster risk management phases Leadership: Ivan Petiteville (CEOS-ESA) Contributors (partners sought): International and regional stakeholders knowledgeable about regional issues related to disaster risk management such as relevant UN agencies; Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR); development banks; national institutions and agencies; representatives from the end user communities; EO and non-EO data providers (satellite data providers such as CEOS Agencies and commercial satellite operators); other EO data and information providers; providers of risk and other relevant information derived from EO data; practitioners (value added information providers including private sector); scientists Additional Information will be presented
17
CA-23: Space and Security Objective Protection of freedom and security of citizens to: – Enhance the resilience of our society against natural and man-made disasters – Develop novel solutions for the protection of critical infrastructures – Improve boarder security – Support security policies in civilian tasks ranging from civil protection to humanitarian relief Leadership: Sergio Albani (EU SatCen) Contributors (proposed): GEO Member and POs; International Organizations such as UN; Ministries of Foreign Affairs; EU and other international agencies; Associations of Space companies
18
CA-26: Towards Chinese Tsunami Mitigation System under GEO Framework Objective Need to develop a Chinese Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis (PTHA) method by following regular seismic hazard analysis methods in China Desire to build a real-time tsunami forecasting system in South China Sea Leadership: Wen Ruizhi (Institute of Engineering and Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration) Contributors (proposed): State Oceanic Administration of China, Japanese Meteorological Agency, U.S. Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL)
19
CA-27: Foster Utilization of Earth Observation Remote Sensing and In Situ Data for all Phases of Disaster Risk Management Objective This activity aims at improving disaster risk management and reduction by providing timely risk information relevant to the full cycle of disaster management (mitigation, preparedness, warning, response and recovery) for use by end user community Leadership: Ivan Petiteville (CEOS-ESA); space community (CEOS – JAXA, ESA, ASI, CNES, CSA, DLR, NASA, NOAA, USGS) Contributors (proposed): UNOOSA, UNITAR, UNEP, EC-JRC, China, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, U.S., IEEE
20
CA-28: Global Flood Risk Monitoring Objective Develop, test and apply methods to utilize satellite remote sensing and other Earth observations with models and maps to estimate location, intensity, and duration of floods globally in real-time and a durable monitoring system of flood risk with climate change Leadership: David Green (U.S./NASA) Contributors (proposed): NOAA, USAID, USGS, FEMA, CDC, USACE, NCAR and other academic partners, the Global Flood Partnership, EC-JRC, CEOS, the World Food Programme, the International Red Cross/Red Crescent, the World Bank, the Latin American Development Bank, UNFP, UNEP, UNESCO, national hydro-metrological organizations, WMO, as well as private sector partners (e.g. Google, Coca Cola, and the insurance sector), and various non-governmental organizations.
21
By increasing capacity to prepare, forecast, mitigate, manage and recover from disasters; in order to achieve a substantial reduction of risk and losses of life and property through an understanding of disaster risk brought by maintaining and strengthening in situ and remotely-sensed Earth and climate observations while enhancing the access to, and the sharing and use of, data and information obtained through such observations. Disaster Resilience SBA - Future This is our opportunity to structure the SBA community; to create a permanent consultation forum for the implementation of the Disaster Resilience SBA and the Strategic Plan and to identify new activities
22
Four Types of GEO Activities
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.