Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The 2016 Election in Historical Context Artemus Ward Dept. of Political Science Northern Illinois University

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The 2016 Election in Historical Context Artemus Ward Dept. of Political Science Northern Illinois University"— Presentation transcript:

1 The 2016 Election in Historical Context Artemus Ward Dept. of Political Science Northern Illinois University aeward@niu.edu

2 American Political Regimes: Reconstruction Throughout American history, a series of political regimes have been constructed and declined over time. A regime begins with a reconstruction. A president, and other office holders, are elected with expansive warrants to repudiate the politics of those who came before. These presidents transform the ideological commitments of the nation and fashion a coalition of various interests in order to gain and wield power. These presidents are generally thought of as the most successful presidents in American history: Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, FDR, and Reagan.

3 American Political Regimes: Articulation Reconstructive presidents are followed by presidents from the same party who articulate the regime’s commitments. These are the “heir apparents” and “faithful sons” who apply the orthodoxy of the regime to new issues that arise. But in doing so, the coalition of interests that held together during the reconstruction begins to fray and these presidents often abdicate or otherwise depart the office under heavy criticism: Monroe, Polk, Theodore Roosevelt, LBJ, and Bush II.

4 American Political Regimes: Disjunction Elected toward the end of a political regime, disjunctive presidents are nominally affiliated with the regime (and the reconstructive and articulative presidents who came before them) and preside over the regime’s downfall as the ideological commitments of the regime are called into question and the coalition of interests that held the regime together becomes untenable. Disjunctive presidents are generally considered among the worst in American history: John Quincy Adams, Pierce, Hoover, and Carter.

5 American Political Regimes: Preemption In between the presidencies held by those affiliated with the political regime are presidents from the opposition party who temporarily preempt the regime. These are the wild cards of American politics with some preemptive presidents able to achieve success (e.g. Cleveland, Eisenhower) by moderating their party’s positions on issues and working with the party that transformed the regime. However, because they are opposition presidents, they have critics on all sides who attempt to delegitimize them and destroy their presidencies. Thus, preemptive presidents are often impeached de facto or de jure: Andrew Johnson, Nixon, Bill Clinton.

6

7

8

9

10

11

12 According Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight.com, Clinton is the overwhelming favorite to win the presidency. Silver’s model uses state-level polling, correcting for the historical reliability of some polls vs. others. Silver has correctly predicted the last two elections—and not just in terms of who will win but also which states and the electoral college vote total.

13 The model predicts that Clinton will win with roughly 312 electoral votes (270 needed). Research shows that polls fluctuate based on negative media coverage: the candidate with the most negative media coverage loses support. Only twice has Trump been close to being favored: 1) at the time of the GOP national convention and 2) in the weeks prior to the first debate when media coverage negatively focused on Clinton’s health and emails. Will negative media coverage of Clinton narrow the race and push Trump to victory by election day?

14 According to Nate Silver’s model, the Democrats have a 68.5% chance of winning control of the Senate. Yet even if they win control it will likely only be by a few seats. Because 60 votes are needed to end debate on any issue, Democrats must rely on moderate GOP Senators to approve appointments and pass legislation.

15 Predictions for a Clinton Presidency Should the patterns of presidential leadership in political time hold true, Clinton will be a preemptive president in a decaying New Right political regime. Like similar presidents, she will have opponents on all sides – both the Republicans (who will likely control the House and retake the Senate in the 2018 midterm elections) and liberal Democrats like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren who will inevitably be disappointed by Clinton’s centrist/conservative appointments and policy positions. They will seek to delegitimize her presidency and impeach her de facto or de jure like Bill Clinton, Richard Nixon, and Andrew Johnson before her. The GOP will be able to use their opposition to her unite the party one final time and win one more election in the current New Right political regime.

16 Predictions for a Trump Presidency Should the patterns of presidential leadership in political time hold true, Trump would be a disjunctive president in a decaying New Right political regime. Like similar presidents, there will be questions over whether he is truly a Republican as he makes appointments and adopts policy positions that have formerly been associated with liberal Democrats (e.g. protectionism on trade). The divisions in the GOP between the moderate (socially liberal, economically conservative) and conservative (socially conservative, economically populist) wings will be heightened as they divide over Trump’s actions. The Democrats will exploit these divisions and ultimately unite behind a new presidential candidate who will repudiate Trump (who will be widely seen as a failed president like the similarly situated presidents before him: Carter, Hoover, Pierce, J.Q. Adams) and reconstruct American politics in a “New Left” political regime.

17 Conclusion According to literature on American political regimes, this election reflects the decaying of the New Right coalition ushered in by Reagan. Regardless of who wins, the disenchantment that voters feel about the country will continue until a new regime reconstructs the nation’s politics. What that new regime will look like depends on what the American people broadly want. And there may be a party realignment taking place even now. If the GOP becomes the party of Trump, moderate Republicans may switch party affiliations and become Democrats. If the Democrats become the party of Sanders/Warren, moderate Democrats may switch their party affiliations and become Republicans.

18 Further Reading To learn more about the rise and fall of American political regimes and presidential leadership in political time, see: Skowronek, Stephen, The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton, revised ed. (New York: Belknap Press, 1997). Skowronek, Stephen, Presidential Leadership in Political Time: Reprise and Reappraisal, 2 nd ed. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2011). For a brief history of each American presidential election, see: Boller, Paul F. Jr., Presidential Campaigns: From George Washington to George W. Bush (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).


Download ppt "The 2016 Election in Historical Context Artemus Ward Dept. of Political Science Northern Illinois University"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google