Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLuke Hines Modified over 8 years ago
1
Open Access Journal Publishing at USF: How We Do It, Why We Do It Todd Chavez Director, Academic Resources 2011-2012 Digital Commons Community Webinar Series February 9, 2012
2
Presentation Goals Touch on current trends in the OA movement Describe USF’s Scholar Commons strategy Discuss staffing and skill sets Touch on workflow Describe future developments Questions
4
Open-Access Publishing Why We Do It, part 1
5
$232 (2007) $432 (2008) “I feel strongly that what we write today is tomorrow’s historical record, and... the ability to set the record straight should not be limited to students and faculty at elite institutions... The historical record should be open and everyone should have access.” Lee D. Baker Duke University
6
“The system is hidebound, expensive and elitist, they say. Peer review can take months, journal subscriptions can be prohibitively costly, and a handful of gatekeepers limit the flow of information. It is an ideal system for sharing knowledge, said the quantum physicist Michael Nielsen, only ‘if you’re stuck with 17th-century technology.’” Thomas Lin “Cracking Open the Scientific Process,” NYT 1/16/12 H.R.3699 -- Research Works Act (December 16, 2011) – Reverses the trend whereby publicly funded research data is openly-accessible to the public.
7
“The Society has published ecological research in journals widely available to the public in libraries and universities for over 90 years. However, it is important to note that there is a significant difference between research results and peer-reviewed publications. Publishers such as ESA have a long record of reporting, analyzing and interpreting federally funded research. It is not appropriate for the federal government to expropriate the additional value publishers add to research results.” Source: ESA December 20,2011 letter to White House Office of Science & Technology Policy, FR Doc. 2011-28623
8
“…. WTF? How did academia become so risk-adverse? The whole point of tenure was to protect radical thinking. But where is the radicalism in academia? I get that there are more important things to protest in the world than scholarly publishing, but why the hell aren’t academics working together to resist the corporatization and manipulation of the knowledge that they produce? Why aren’t they collectively teaming up to challenge the status quo? Journal articles aren’t nothing … they’re the very product of our knowledge production process.” Danah Boyd Senior Researcher, Microsoft Research Research Associate, Harvard's Berkman Center for Internet & Society
9
“In my view, substituting open access for closed access journals is a necessary but not sufficient change to our system of academic communication. We need to recognize new modes of publication and dissemination of knowledge that are relevant beyond the academy, and we need to formalize credibility in this new, broader context. That would be truly radical.” John Hawks Paleoanthropologist University of Wisconsin-Madison http://johnhawks.net/weblog/topics/metascience/tenured-inertia-2012.html
10
Open-Access Publishing How We Do It
11
Repository Services Digital Access Organization & Curation Long-Term Preservation eScholarship Services Publication & Scholarly Communication Data Management Planning Rights Management OA Publishing Services Digital Access & Preservation Impact Assessment Consultation & Strategic Planning Geoportal & Data Repository Data Curation & Preservation Information Visualization Enterprise GIS
12
OA Publishing Services Digital Access & Preservation Impact Assessment Consultation & Strategic Planning Library’s publishing targets … Open-access journals Open-access ebooks Open-access collections/digital projects Electronic theses/dissertations
14
Allocation of FTE, 2008 (n=27)
15
Allocation of FTE, 2011 (n=28) 20% Salary
16
Decision to Support Aim & Scope Align w/Library’s Strategic Interests Active & “Healthy” Editorial Profile Globally- relevant, Interdisciplinary Topics Peer-reviewed Committed to Open-Access
17
Operational Matters: People & Workflows
18
Pete Reehling GIS/Data Mgmt. Richard McKenzie GIS Technician Beverly Caggiano Data Mgmt. Data Management Rebel Saul- Cummings IR Mgmt. Brian Falato IR Metadata IR Management Carol Ann Borchert OA Publishing Julie Fielding OA Journals Brenna Mathiesen OA Journals OA Publishing Scholar Commons Team
19
Valuable Skills & Experience Serial Collection Management Acquisitions Vendor Interactions Record of Publishing Editing Skills Layout & Graphics Cataloging & Metadata Database Management XML Markup Batch Record Loading & MS Excel Rights Management Publishing Trends Experience with Social Networking Knowledge of Persistent IDs Understand Peer Review Project Management Metrics Applied to Journals Carol Ann Borchert Brenna Mathiasen Julie Fielding Rebel Saul-Cumming
20
Simplified Timeline for Launch MOU Crafted & Signed Journal Described OR Journal Adapted Site Created Editor Training LAUNCH ! Elapsed time = 4-6 weeks
21
MOU – Hosting Agreement Enumerates services proffered Defines responsibilities Establishes grant of “non-exclusive, worldwide license for electronic dissemination” of content, abstracts, TOCs, reference lists, and metadata Describes the scope, aim, style/format, and policies of the journal
23
Peer-Review Completed Address Rights Management Issues Meet Unique Layout Requirements Search References for DOIs/PURLs Arrange Publication Order Assign Article DOIs XML Files to CrossRef Index Content in DOAJ, etc. Publish! “Typical” Workflow* * No such thing as “typical”
24
$48,000 Copyediting Needs Among USF STEM Faculty n = 38
25
Open-Access Publishing Why We Do It, part 2 The Results
26
Journal users view 3.5 pages per visit versus 2.25 view for the average user across the Library’s web content. IJS, JSS, and Studia Geologia are three of the top four landing pages and three of the top five exit pages. Just over 50% of users are viewing from the US, with additional traffic from, in order of frequency, India, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Australia.
27
Total 2011 downloads = 8,717; lifetime = 19,042 Average monthly downloads = 739.25 46% of all of the title’s downloads occurred in 2011 Articles per issue = 6.3 100% of articles downloaded 50+ times; 88% over 100 times Average article downloads = 272 (921 maximum)
28
359.40% increase in article downloads from 2008 Total lifetime downloads = 22,637 Average monthly downloads = 511 76% of articles downloaded 100+ times Articles per issue = 6.6 26% of downloads from outside the USA
29
204% increase in article downloads from 2010-2011 Total lifetime downloads = 22,637 61.45% of articles downloaded 100+ times Articles per issue = 7 Redefining Terrorism downloaded 1,829 times
30
91% increase in article downloads from first-half 2011 Total 2011 downloads = 3,703 38% of articles downloaded 100+ times Articles per issue = 10.6
31
Coming in 2012
32
Evolutionary Process
33
The Library's Environmental Sustainability initiatives include materials published by the library and by strategic partners. The Textbook Affordability Project (TAP) counters rising education costs by connecting students and faculty with alternatives to full- price textbooks.
34
Geoportal & Data Repository Data Curation & Preservation Information Visualization Enterprise GIS Bringing data to the OA process …. GIS Specialist Programmer System Architect Data Librarian GIS Specialist Richard McKenzie Beverly CaggianoPete Reehling
35
Presentation Take-Aways With faculty, cost-benefit discussions take second place to those regarding the public good and impact Skills, skills, skills – the people you have can retool/retrain to be OA experts MOUs are important (go slow at the beginning to go fast later) Success breeds success – plan to grow
36
Questions & Thank You
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.