1. TGai SB3000 Comment Overview
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
July 2016
TGai SB3000 Comment Overview
Date:
Authors:
Marc Emmelmann, SELF
Marc Emmelmann, SELF

2. Abstract Overview on comments received during SB3000 (2nd SB recirc).
Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
July 2016
Abstract
Overview on comments received during SB3000 (2nd SB recirc).
Marc Emmelmann, SELF
Marc Emmelmann, SELF

3. Summary 6 comments received
July 2016
Summary
6 comments received
XL comment spread sheet:
Comment breakdown
1 comment identifies unsatisfied comments from previous ballots
2 comments wrt. deleted MLME FILS container section
1 comment asking to remove DILS feature
1 against Annex C (dot11CacheIdentifier is not listed in Dot11FILSConfigEntry.)
1 comment (editorial) regarding missing / misplaced minus sign in formula
Marc Emmelmann, SELF

4. July 2016
Annex C comment (CID 30001)
Comment: dot11CacheIdentifier is not listed in Dot11FILSConfigEntry.
Proposed resolution: Include dot11CacheIdentifier.
Submission:
Marc Emmelmann, SELF

5. DILS comment (CID 30002) July 2016
Comment: DILS functionally does not work because non-AP STAs can just claim they have priority ignore any indication by the AP to wait. They can also easily change their MAC address to pass whatever filter the AP is indicating.
Proposed resolution: Get rid of Differentiated Link Setup. Strike section in its entirety and remove all the related components in section 9 and elsewhere in the draft.
Note: DILS-related comments have been discussed in Tgai before.
Related comment asking to delete DILS were rejected.
CID was discussed in Tgai telco.
Dedicate specific session in San Diego to it.
Discuss on how to resolve, i.e.
Reject based on the fact that the kind of comment was discussed befroe
Action on it, e.g., by deleting DILS
Discussion will start on Monday PM-1 and will continue on Tuesday PM-1
Marc Emmelmann, SELF

6. Unsatisfied comments (CID 30003)
July 2016
Unsatisfied comments (CID 30003)
Commenter does not provide new feedback but identifies unsatisfied comments.
Comment should be rejected with the following reason:
Reject. The comment does not identify a specific technical remedy but is submitted to identify unsatisfied comments from the previous ballot. The BRC thanks the commenter for providing his feedback. The cited unsatisfied comments are marked as such in the comment database.
Marc Emmelmann, SELF

7. Error or type in Formula (CID 30004)
July 2016
Error or type in Formula (CID 30004)
Cls.: P140L58
Comment: spurious negative sign in front of inverse(Q).
Proposed resolution: Make it "P = D(C) = elem-op(C, inverse(Q))“
Review comment in session and decide if it can be accepted.
Marc Emmelmann, SELF

8. MLME FIlS container primitives (CIDs 30005 & 30006)
July 2016
MLME FIlS container primitives (CIDs & 30006)
Issue: Since we deleted the FILS-container MLME section, there is no means to trigger the creation of a FILS-MLME
Suggested resolution: reestablish the deleted text or delete all references / clauses relating to FILS container.
Note: Reestablishing text means also looking at comments that were against the (currently) deleted text, i.e., comments against Cls which are CIDs and 20176
Related submission to address CIDs and pending
Technical discussion will start Monday PM1
Marc Emmelmann, SELF

9. Comment and resolutions from last SB
July 2016
Comment and resolutions from last SB
CID 20175
Comment: Why is FILSIPAddressAssignment an optional parameter to this primitive? What's the point of the primitive ever being used without this parameter?
Proposed resolution (by commenter): Delete the sentence starting, "The parameter is optionally present ..."
CID 20176
Comment: The FILSContainerTimeLimit appears to be purely a local process (nothing is exchanged with the peer, no other behavior is linked to this timeout). Such local timeout processing does not need to be specified in the Standard.
Proposed resolution (by commenter): Remove the FILSContainerTimeLimit argument.
Approved Resolution for both CIDs:
REVISED (TGai General: :42:39Z)
The MLME-FILSContainer primitives are not actually used at all.
Delete: and all its subclauses.
Marc Emmelmann, SELF

10. Suggested order of discussion
July 2016
Suggested order of discussion
Monday
Information of PAR extension documents
Discussion of CIDs & 30004
DILS – 15 minute discussion & straw poll on how to proceed
MLME technical discussion
Annex (CID ), if time permits
Tuesday PM-1
Motions related to extending the PAR
Motion to approve resolutions discussed in former slot
DILS (CID 30002)
MLME (CIDs & 30006)
Annex (CID )
Marc Emmelmann, SELF