Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDenis Parsons Modified over 8 years ago
1
Experimental Research Designs
2
Experimental Design Advantages Best establishes cause-and-effect relationships Disadvantages Artificiality of experiments Feasibility Unethical
3
Causality Temporal precedence Covariation between IV and DV Eliminate alternative explanations
4
Types of Experimental Designs Simple True Experimental Complex True Experimental Quasi-Experimental
5
Types of Experimental Designs Simple True Experimental Complex True Experimental Quasi-Experimental
6
Simple True Experimental Characteristics Types Variations
7
Characteristics of True Designs Manipulation (treatment) Randomization Control group Characteristics of simple true designs One IV with 2 levels (T, C) One DV
8
Types Randomized posttest control group design Randomized pretest-posttest control group design
9
Randomized posttest control group design RTPost RCPost
10
Randomized pretest-posttest control group design RPreTPost RPreCPost
11
Advantages & Disadvantages Advantages of pretest design Equivalency of groups Can measure extent of change Determine inclusion Assess reasons for and effects of mortality Disadvantages of pretest design Time-consuming Sensitization to pre-test
12
Solomon four-group design RPreTPost RPreCPost RTPost RCPost
13
Variations Independent groups (between groups) Repeated measures (within groups)
14
Repeated Measures Design Advantages: Fewer subjects needed (less costly) Sensitive to finding statistical differences Disadvantages: Order effect (practice, fatigue, carry-over)
15
Dealing with Order Effects Counterbalancing n! Latin squares
16
Latin Squares 1234 Row 1 A (60) B (0) D (120) C (180) Row 2 B (0) C (180) A (60) D (120) Row 3 C (180) D (120) B (0) A (60) Row 4 D (120) A (60) C (180) B (0)
17
Dealing with Order Effects Counterbalancing n! Latin squares Randomized blocks Time interval between treatments
18
Variations Independent groups (between) vs. repeated measures (within) designs Consider external validity when deciding which design to use.
19
Types of Experimental Designs Simple True Experimental Complex True Experimental Quasi-Experimental Pre-Experimental
20
Characteristics of True Designs Manipulation (treatment) Randomization Control group Characteristics of simple true designs One IV with 2 levels (T, C) One DV
21
Complex True Experimental Randomized matched control group design Increased levels of IV Factorial design Multiple DVs
22
Complex True Experimental Randomized matched control group design Increased levels of IV Factorial design Multiple DVs
23
Randomized matched control group design MRTPost MRCPost Used in small samples cost in time & money
24
Complex True Experimental Randomized matched control group design Increased levels of IV Factorial design Multiple DVs
25
Increased Levels of IV Provides more complete information about the relationship between the IV & DV Detects curvilinear relationships Examines effects of multiple treatments
26
Performance level (% complete) Amount of reward promised ($) DV IV
27
Increased Levels of IV Performance level (% complete) Amount of reward promised ($) DV IV
28
Complex True Experimental Randomized matched control group design Increased levels of IV Factorial design Multiple DVs
29
Factorial Design >1 IV (factor) Simultaneously determine effects of 2 or more factors on the DV (real world) Between Factor vs. Within Factor ID’d by # of factors and levels of factors 2X2
30
Do differing exercise regimens (hi, med, lo intensity) have the same effect on men as they do on women? 3 X 2 (Exercise Regimen X Gender) 2 factors Exercise Regimen – 3 levels Gender – 2 levels Between factors DV? Experimental IVs or Participant IVs?
32
Do strength gains occur at the same rate in men as they do in women over a 6 mo. training period? Measurements are taken at 0, 2, 4, 6 mo. 2 X 4 (Gender X Time) ? factors Time – 4 levels Gender – 2 levels Between or within factors? DV? Experimental IVs or Participant IVs?
34
Cell means, Margin means Main Effects, Interactions Cell means Margin means Grand mean
35
Interaction& Main Effects Interaction - combined effect of the factors on the dependent variable Main effect – the deviation of two or more treatment means from the grand mean
37
Parallel lines indicate no interaction. Is there a main effect?
38
Is there a main effect?
39
Non-parallel lines indicate an interaction. Is there a main effect?
40
Is there a main effect?
41
Interpretation Always interpret the interaction first (graphical) If no significant interaction, interpret main effects
42
Advantages of factorial designs: Greater protection against Type I error More efficient Can examine the interaction Disadvantages: subject # for between factor designs Consider external validity when deciding which design to use.
43
IV A: Exposure to Violence – violent vs. nonviolent video IV B: Gender – male vs. female DV: # ads recalled (0-8) 12 1153 2957 55 A B 1 5 9 12 A B1B1 B2B2
44
1 5 9 12 A B1B1 B2B2 A: Yes B: No AxB: Yes
45
Complex True Experimental Randomized matched control group design Increased levels of IV Factorial design Multiple DVs
46
Do strength gains occur at the same rate in men as they do in women over a 6 mo. training period? Measurements are taken at 0, 2, 4, 6 mo.
47
Types of Experimental Designs Simple True Experimental Complex True Experimental Quasi-Experimental
48
Characteristics of True Designs Manipulation (treatment) Randomization Control group Less control More real-world Program evaluation
49
Randomized posttest control group design RTPost RCPost
50
Randomized pretest-posttest control group design RPreTPost RPreCPost
51
Quasi-experimental Designs One group posttest-only design One group pretest-posttest design Non-equivalent control group design Non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design Time series Single subject designs (Case study) Developmental designs
52
Quasi-experimental Designs One group posttest-only design One group pretest-posttest design Non-equivalent control group design Non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design Time series Single subject designs (Case study) Developmental designs
53
Randomized posttest control group design RTPost RCPost
54
One group posttest-only design (One shot study) TPost No control of IV threats Use?
55
Quasi-experimental Designs One shot study One group pretest-posttest design Non-equivalent control group design Non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design Time series Single subject designs (Case study) Developmental designs
56
Randomized pretest-posttest control group design RPreTPost RPreCPost
57
One group pretest-posttest design PreTPost History Maturation Testing Instrument decay Regression Use control group
58
Quasi-experimental Designs One shot study One group pretest-posttest design Non-equivalent control group design Non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design Time series Single subject designs (Case study) Developmental designs
59
Randomized posttest control group design RTPost RCPost
60
Non-equivalent control group design (Static group comparison design) TPost CPost Selection bias
61
Quasi-experimental Designs One shot study One group pretest-posttest design Non-equivalent control group design Non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design Time series Single subject designs (Case study) Developmental designs
62
Randomized pretest-posttest control group design RPreTPost RPreCPost
63
Non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design PreTPost PreCPost Can check selection bias
64
Quasi-experimental Designs One shot study One group pretest-posttest design Non-equivalent control group design Non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design Time series Single subject designs (Case study) Developmental designs
65
Time series Pre Pre Pre Pre T Post Post Post Post
66
Quasi-experimental Designs One shot study One group pretest-posttest design Non-equivalent control group design Non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design Time series Single subject designs (Case study) Developmental designs
67
Quasi-experimental Designs One shot study One group pretest-posttest design Non-equivalent control group design Non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design Time series Single subject designs (Case study) Developmental designs
68
Developmental Research Designs Longitudinal Powerful (within subject) Time consuming Attrition Testing effect Cross Sectional Less time consuming Cohorts problem
69
Choosing a Research Design Best addresses the problem Ethics Cost in time and money Validity (internal & external)
70
Experimental design 5 m Subambient CO2 tunnelElevated CO2 tunnel 250 ppm 500 ppm 370 ppm
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.