1. Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Improved Self-Tuning Fuzzy Proportional–Integral–Derivative Versus Fuzzy-Adaptive Proportional– Integral–Derivative for Speed Control of Nonlinear Hybrid Electric Vehicles J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam. 2016;11(6):061013-061013-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033685 Mechatronics diagram of the electronic throttle control system Figure Legend:

2. Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Improved Self-Tuning Fuzzy Proportional–Integral–Derivative Versus Fuzzy-Adaptive Proportional– Integral–Derivative for Speed Control of Nonlinear Hybrid Electric Vehicles J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam. 2016;11(6):061013-061013-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033685 (a) Schematic diagram of the HEV system and (b) block diagram of vehicle with ETCS for speed control application Figure Legend:

3. Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Improved Self-Tuning Fuzzy Proportional–Integral–Derivative Versus Fuzzy-Adaptive Proportional– Integral–Derivative for Speed Control of Nonlinear Hybrid Electric Vehicles J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam. 2016;11(6):061013-061013-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033685 Structure of the C-F-PID controller Figure Legend:

4. Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Improved Self-Tuning Fuzzy Proportional–Integral–Derivative Versus Fuzzy-Adaptive Proportional– Integral–Derivative for Speed Control of Nonlinear Hybrid Electric Vehicles J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam. 2016;11(6):061013-061013-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033685 Configuration of AF-NA-PID and AF-A-PID controller Figure Legend:

5. Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Improved Self-Tuning Fuzzy Proportional–Integral–Derivative Versus Fuzzy-Adaptive Proportional– Integral–Derivative for Speed Control of Nonlinear Hybrid Electric Vehicles J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam. 2016;11(6):061013-061013-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033685 Structure of the ISTF-PID controller Figure Legend:

6. Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Improved Self-Tuning Fuzzy Proportional–Integral–Derivative Versus Fuzzy-Adaptive Proportional– Integral–Derivative for Speed Control of Nonlinear Hybrid Electric Vehicles J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam. 2016;11(6):061013-061013-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033685 Response of ETCS with PI controller Figure Legend:

7. Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Improved Self-Tuning Fuzzy Proportional–Integral–Derivative Versus Fuzzy-Adaptive Proportional– Integral–Derivative for Speed Control of Nonlinear Hybrid Electric Vehicles J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam. 2016;11(6):061013-061013-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033685 Response of speed with (a) C-PID, O-PID, C-STF-PID, and ISTF-PID controllers and (b) C-F-PID, AF-NA-PID, and AF-A-PID controllers Figure Legend:

8. Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Improved Self-Tuning Fuzzy Proportional–Integral–Derivative Versus Fuzzy-Adaptive Proportional– Integral–Derivative for Speed Control of Nonlinear Hybrid Electric Vehicles J. Comput. Nonlinear Dynam. 2016;11(6):061013-061013-7. doi:10.1115/1.4033685 Speed response of HEV under disturbance due to road grade and uncertainty in mass Figure Legend: