1. Ministry of Strategy and Finance of Korea Korea Development Institute (KDI) Ministry of Environment and Water of Bulgaria 2015/16 Korea-Bulgaria Knowledge Sharing Program Strategies for Enhancing the Extended Producer Responsibility System in Bulgaria : The Case of WEEE Anton Ognyanov Peychev Ministry of Environemt and Water of Bulgaria Feb. 24, 2016

2. Table of Contents 1.Introduction : Why dealing with WEEE EPR for KSP is important 2.Current Bulgarian EPR status: facts and trends 2.1. Historical development 2.2. Stakeholders responsibilities 2.3. Achievement of target 3.Critical issues 3.1. System-related 3.2. Regulation-related 3.3. Culture and Education-Related 3.4. Economic Incentives-Related 2

3. Introduction : Why dealing with WEEE EPR for KSP is important 3 ▶ Bulgaria’s way to EU ▶ Legal framework change transposition of EU acts and implementation of new principles ▶ Factors on effectiveness of waste managements systems ▶ Benefit from the KSP project

4. CURRENT STATUS OF BULGARIAN EPR 4 ▶ HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT ▷ INITIAL STEPS OF EPR SYSTEM – introduction of EPR for packaging waste, first regulations ▷ WASTE MANAGEMENT BUDGET – municipal waste financing mechanism, law change (2017) (unit: thousands BGN) Municipal Revenues and Expenses ▶ Municipal Waste Collection and Transportation and purchase of waste containers – more than 50% ▶ Increase of expenses on R&D, Construction, Maintenance, Operation, Closure of Landfills – 18% (2012) ▶ Season cleaning – around 30% Revenues and Expenses2009201020112012 Total Revenue from Municipal Waste Fee436 007466 859509 145516 489 Total Waste Management Municipal Expenses377 432360 201409 142402 773

5. CURRENT STATUS OF BULGARIAN EPR (2) 5 ▷ EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY FOR WEEE ▶ Bulgarian WEEE ordinance – transposition of EU WEEE Directive (Directive 2002/96/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment) ▶ First WEEE Producer Responsibility Organizations (PRO) ▶ WEEE PROs in 2015

6. CURRENT STATUS OF BULGARIAN EPR (3) 6 ▶ STAKEHOLDERS RESPONSIBILITIES ▶ WEEE Directive (Directive 2002/96/EC) ▶ Scope of regulations - WEEE categories and targets ▶ EEE producers obligations – design, user information, marking; achieving targets ▶ Individual compliance and PROs membership ▶ PROs obligations – collection and recycling of WEEE on behalf of their members CategoryRate of recovery* Rate of reuse and recycling 1 and 1080 %75 % 3 and 475 %65 % 2, 5, 6, 7 and 970 %50 % gas discharge lamps 80 %

7. CURRENT STATUS OF BULGARIAN EPR (4) 7

8. CURRENT STATUS OF BULGARIAN EPR (5) 8 ▶ ACHIEVEMENT OF TARGETS Eurostat data (tonnes) Categories EEE put on the market20092010201120122013 1Large household appliances41,09736,38136,60738,65240,732 2Small household appliances2,5373,1002,8792,6163,462 3IT and telecommunications equipment3,3013,3343,1053,2453,489 4Consumer equipment5,6314,8814,7434,4825,009 5Lighting equipment613478453481469 5aGas discharge lamps557607423382483 6Electrical and electronic tools1,0611,4231,8591,8141,768 7Toys, leisure and sports equipment539233278485606 8Medical devices291129167204241 9Monitoring and control instruments223459375572269 10Automatic dispensers199181285210173 TOTAL56,04951,20651,17453,14356,701

9. CURRENT STATUS OF BULGARIAN EPR (6) 9 ▶ ACHIEVEMENT OF TARGETS ▶ Collection of WEEE from households / non-households ▶ Recovery and recycling targets calculation Collected from households YearCategores TOTAL BY YEAR (t) 1 and 103 and 42,5,6,7 and 98 gas discharge lamps 200928,893.503,020.505,375.70145.20160.4037,595.30 201031,156.905,102.705,441.70125.40268.1042,094.80 201127,837.103,962.705,698.90137.90126.0037,762.60 201225,622.104,529.004,236.10105.2063.9034,556.30 201326,003.504,440.703,300.40126.6042.6033,913.80 TOTAL BY CATEGORY 139,513.1021,055.6024,052.80640.30661.00

10. CURRENT STATUS OF BULGARIAN EPR (7) 10 ▶ ACHIEVEMENT OF TARGETS ▶ Recovery, recycling, compared to set targets

11. CRITICAL ISSUES ON EPR SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS 11 ▶ SYSTEM-RELATED ▶ MIXED MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM ▶ TERRITORIAL STRUCTURE OF THE COUNTRY – MUNICIPALITIES, SETTLEMENTS ▶ WASTE SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS – SEPARATE COLLECTION, MIXED WASTE COLLECTION ▶ INFORMAL SECTOR ▶ REGULATION-RELATED ▶ ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ▶ ILLEGAL DISMANTLING, RISKS ▶ SOCIAL AND FINANCIAL LOSS IN REGULATION OF RECYCLABLES ▶ LOSS OF TRACKING ▶ LOSS OF RECYCLABLES

12. CRITICAL ISSUES ON EPR SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS (2) 12 ▶ CULTURE AND EDUCATION-RELATED ▶ INSUFFICIENT ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION ▶ EDUCATION SYSTEM AND CAMPAIGNS ▶ LACK OF COHERENT AND COMPLETE INFORMATION ▶ FRAGMENTED INFORMATION ▶ LACK OF MOTIVATION TO RECYCLE ▶ BEHAVIOUR AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND, LIFE SPAN OF PRODUCTS ▶ ECONOMIC INCENTIVES-RELATED ▶ FINANCIAL REMUNERATION AND COMPENSATION ▶ WASTE COMPENSATIONS, COSTS, COMFORT ▶ MARKETING INSTRUMENTS ▶ WASTE MANAGEMENT MUNICIPAL TAXATION SYSTEM ▶ TAXATION MECHANISM, LACK OF “PAY AS YOU THROW” PRINCIPLE

13. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! 13