1. Peter M Swift CMA, March 2004 Trade Associations and how they can represent their members with governments, extra-government organizations, and enforcement agencies

2. A Measure of a “Good Trade Association” ?

3. Trade Associations and how they represent their members’ interests CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS: Know and understand members’ interests Value adding to membership Clear understanding and sharing of vision, objectives, strategies and policies Acknowledged as credible, respected and trusted representative & spokesperson for the industry/sector Recognised as a leader – proactive rather than reactive Represented in the principal theatres

4. Representation in the Principal Theatres

5. Trade Associations and how they represent their members’ interests CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS (IN PRACTICE): Competent, knowledgeable and respected secretariat Executive and secretariat supported by membership Capable of acting quickly and decisively Effective communicator internally and externally Partnership with key stakeholders Able to bring influence in key arenas Cooperate with other associations with like-interest Must have a critical mass

6. Partnership with Key Stakeholders SHIPOWNER SHIPYARDS INSURERS BANKS & INVESTORS CARGO OWNER CHARTERER PORTS & TERMINALS CLASS SOCIETIES FLAG STATES Working with regulators and legislators

7. Co-operation with Other Associations The ROUND TABLE of international shipping associations

8. Port State Control - the industry perspective  PSC is actively supported by industry  It is imperative that the integrity of PSC is maintained  More needs to be done to ensure consistency  Greater sharing of inspection records would be beneficial  Better targeting would result from additional analysis of PSC records  Quality lessons can be learned by analysing PSC records

9. Port State Control – tankers share of detentions

10. Port State Control – detentions by ship size

11. Port State Control – detentions by year of build

13. Port State Control – tanker detentions Reasons 1.Lifesaving appliances (72) 2.Certificates and documents (52) 3.Fire fighting measures (42) 4.Safety of navigation, charts, publications (21) 5.MARPOL Annex I – oil filtering equipment (18) 6.ISM Code related (11) These 6 categories above cover about 70% of the 2003 tanker detentions. The remaining includes a vast number of different reasons.

14. Port State Control overview 2001-2003 DETENTIONS vs. INSPECTIONS PSC AuthorityDetentions vs. Inspections2003 est.20022001 All ships of which tankersAll ships of which tankersAll ships of which tankers No of inspections22,3822,67119,5882,34117,3792,062 Tokyo MoUNo of detentions1,7601561,3071661,349117 Detentions / Inspections Ratio7.9%5.8%6.7%7.1%7.8%5.7% No of inspections10,5182,73510,5182,73510,7112,785 USCGNo of detentions153201792317227 Detentions / Inspections Ratio1.5%0.7%1.7%0.8%1.6%1.0% No of inspections20,7843,11419,7712,79418,7111,719 Paris MoUNo of detentions1,5741501,5761251,706117 Detentions / Inspections Ratio7.6%4.8%8.0%4.5%9.1%6.8% No of inspections 53,6848,52049,8777,87046,8016,566 Total No of detentions 3,4873263,0623143,227279 Detentions / Inspections Ratio 6.5%3.8%6.1%4.0%6.9%4.2% Estimate for USCG tanker inspections 2001-2003 Source : Paris MoU, Tokyo MOU and USCG websites and annual reports / INTERTANKO

15. Tanker detentions by flag 2003 – above average

16. Tanker detentions by flag 2003 – below average

17. Tanker detentions by class 2003

18. Industry Leadership - Flag State Guidelines

19. Industry Leadership - Recycling Industry Code of Practice on Ship Recycling Inventory of Potentially Hazardous Materials on Board

20. Industry Leadership – Tripartite Dialogue on Newbuilding Standards INTERTANKO’s Newbuilding Awareness Guide for tankers

21. Trade Associations and how they represent their members’ interests Encouraging early ratification:  MARPOL Annex VI: Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships (Sept. 1997) [12]  Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea (HNS 1996)[4]  Protocol on Preparedness, Response and Co-operation to Pollution Incidents by Hazardous and Noxious Substances (OPRC-HNS Protocol 2000) [7]  Bunkers Convention (2001) [3]  Antifouling Convention (2001) [5]

22. Reception Facilities How long do we have to wait ?

23. Places of Refuge How long do we have to wait ?

24. Criminalisation – a NEGATIVE TO PROGRESS !

25. Thank you www.intertanko.com