Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClinton Harrison Modified over 8 years ago
1
The Dynamical State of Massive Galaxy Clusters Conclusions Lensing to dynamical mass discrepancy do seems to probe the dynamical state of galaxy clusters. Most of the low-z X-ray luminous clusters of our sample are close to a state of dynamical equilibrium. Dynamical activity appears to be more frequent for high mass clusters Consistent with the hierarchical scenario. Active (merging) clusters tend to have higher ICM temperatures than expected given their masses. Conclusions Lensing to dynamical mass discrepancy do seems to probe the dynamical state of galaxy clusters. Most of the low-z X-ray luminous clusters of our sample are close to a state of dynamical equilibrium. Dynamical activity appears to be more frequent for high mass clusters Consistent with the hierarchical scenario. Active (merging) clusters tend to have higher ICM temperatures than expected given their masses. Eduardo S. Cypriano (UCL-UK), Laerte Sodré Jr. (USP-Brazil), Jean-Paul Kneib OAMP-France) & Luis Campusano (U. de Chile) Clusters as cosmoligical probes ? Depends strongly on a well calibrated and tight Mass × Observable relation Widely available observables ( V T X L X S-Z ) depend on the dynamical state of the cluster Comparison with weak-lensing equivalents allows the diagnose whether the cluster is relaxed or not Clusters as cosmoligical probes ? Depends strongly on a well calibrated and tight Mass × Observable relation Widely available observables ( V T X L X S-Z ) depend on the dynamical state of the cluster Comparison with weak-lensing equivalents allows the diagnose whether the cluster is relaxed or not 1 Sample & Observations 24 Abell clusters (0.05 5 1044 erg s-1 (XBAC’s Ebeling 1996) Imaging: V R I (330 s each) with FORS1@VLT (FoV: 6.8’ 6.8’) Sample & Observations 24 Abell clusters (0.05 5 1044 erg s-1 (XBAC’s Ebeling 1996) Imaging: V R I (330 s each) with FORS1@VLT (FoV: 6.8’ 6.8’) 2 Shape measurments Algorithm: Im2shape (Bridle et al. 1998) Stars (PSF probes) selected by their FWHM Shapes of galaxies are deconvolved by the local PSF Algorithm: Im2shape (Bridle et al. 1998) Stars (PSF probes) selected by their FWHM Shapes of galaxies are deconvolved by the local PSF Seeing ~ 0.6” Ellip. ~ 3% STARS 10-15 gal. arcmin -2 GALAXIES 3 Shear Radial Profile To overcame the mass sheet degeneracy we estimate mass by fitting SIS profiles to the radial shear data thus obtaining SIS Shear Radial Profile To overcame the mass sheet degeneracy we estimate mass by fitting SIS profiles to the radial shear data thus obtaining SIS Singular Isothermal Sphere (SIS) 4 Detailed studies of the clusters with the highest lensing × dynamical discrepancy confirms that they are dynamically active A1451 “...establishing equilibrium after a merger event” (Valtachanov et al. 2002) 6 A2744 (AC118) 8 Girardi & Mezzetti (2001) σ total = 1777 km/s σ A = 1121 km/s σ B = 682 km/s Interpretation: There are two structures along the line of sight Particular case: Virial mass > Lensing > X-rays 1) The superposition of structures artificially increases V 2) Lensing measures the mass of both structures 3) T X measures, based on X-ray spectra will be dominated by the more luminous structure only. 1) The superposition of structures artificially increases V 2) Lensing measures the mass of both structures 3) T X measures, based on X-ray spectra will be dominated by the more luminous structure only. A2163 “State of violent activity” (Markevitch & Vickhlinin 2001) 7 X-ray measured ICM temperature profile (left) and distribution (right) showing a complete lack of isothermality. 5 A2744 A1451 A2163 T X ~ T SIS Lensing × dynamical mass proxies A2744 A1451 A2163 V ~ SIS The plots show the comparison between dynamical mass proxies: X-ray temperature and galaxy velocity dispersion, with its lensing counterparts Most clusters seems to be in equilibrium (i.e. lensing and dynamical methods in agreement) but it is not true for the hottest (T X > 8keV) and with higher vel. disp. ( V > 1100 km/s) ones.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.