1. KELLER MGMT 520 W EEK 6 Y OU D ECIDE C HECK THIS A+ TUTORIAL GUIDELINE AT HTTP :// WWW. ASSIGNMENTCLOUD. COM / MGMT -520/ MGMT -520- WEEK -6- YOU - DECIDE - ES F OR MORE CLASSES VISIT HTTP :// WWW. ASSIGNMENTCLOUD. COM EDDY ’ S S UPPLIES ’ CEO HAS ASKED YOU TO ADVISE HIM ON THE FACTS OF THE CASE AND YOUR OPINION OF THEIR POTENTIAL LIABILITY. H E WANTS TO SETTLE THE CASE. W RITE A MEMO TO HIM THAT STATES YOUR VIEW OF WHETHER THE COMPANY IS EXPOSED TO LIABILITY ON ALL ISSUES YOU FEEL ARE IN PLAY. I NCLUDE IN YOUR MEMO ANY LAWS THAT APPLY AND ANY PRECEDENT CASES EITHER FOR OR AGAINST T EDDY ’ S CASE THAT IMPACT LIABILITY. I NCLUDE IN THE MEMO YOUR SUGGESTED “ OFFER OF SETTLEMENT ” TO V IRGINIA. B ACK UP YOUR OFFER USING YOUR ANALYSIS OF THE CASE AGAINST T EDDY ’ S.V IRGINIA P OLLARD WORKED AS A CASHIER AND CLERK FOR T EDDY ’ S S UPPLIES, A FAMILY - OWNED CHAIN OF FILM PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT SUPPLY STORES IN P ENNSYLVANIA AND N EW J ERSEY. D URING A ROUTINE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION, V IRGINIA ’ S SUPERVISOR AT T EDDY ’ S COMPLAINED THAT SHE MADE TOO MANY PERSONAL PHONE CALLS WHEN SHE WORKED IN THE W EST O RANGE STORE. T HE SUPERVISOR NOTED THIS ON V IRGINIA ’ S ANNUAL REVIEW, AND WARNED HER TO KEEP PERSONAL CALLS TO A BARE MINIMUM WHILE AT WORK. S OON THEREAFTER, T EDDY TRANSFERRED P OLLARD TO GUARD FILM EQUIPMENT IN THE MAIN WAREHOUSE BEHIND THE STOREFRONT ; V IRGINIA COULDN ’ T MAKE PERSONAL CALLS THERE, AND HER WORK BECAME EXEMPLARY. H ER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION THREE MONTHS AFTER HER TRANSFER WAS “ MEETING EXPECTATIONS ” WITH NO NEGATIVE COMMENTS HTTP :// WWW. ASSIGNMENTCLOUD. COM / MGMT -520/ MGMT -520- WEEK -6- YOU - DECIDE - ES HTTP :// WWW. ASSIGNMENTCLOUD. COM

2. T HE CIRCUIT COURT OVERTURNED THE DECISION OF THE NJ H UMAN R IGHTS C OMMISSION THAT HAD FOUND THAT P OLLARD WAS THE VICTIM OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND DISPARATE TREATMENT. P LEASE ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS T HE CEO ASKS YOU TO REVIEW THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY CURRENTLY IN PLACE THAT V IRGINIA SIGNED. H E WANTS YOU TO PROVIDE HIM WITH SUGGESTIONS FOR CHANGES TO IT. R EVIEW THE POLICY AND GIVE THREE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHANGES, ENHANCEMENTS, AND IDEAS FOR MAKING THE POLICY STRONGER. I NCLUDE YOUR REASONS FOR THESE SUGGESTIONS. I F YOU FIND INFORMATION ONLINE FOR MAKING THESE CHANGES, INCLUDE CITATIONS AND / OR LINKS TO THAT INFORMATION. E XPLAIN HOW YOUR SUGGESTIONS MAY HAVE PROTECTED T EDDY ’ S IN THIS CASE. S UPPORT THESE RECOMMENDATIONS WITH CURRENT CASE LAW. H OW WOULD P OLLARD ’ S CASE BE IMPACTED IF HER REPLACEMENT HAD BEEN A FEMALE ? W OULD HER CASE BE DIFFERENT ? W OULD HER DAMAGES BE DIFFERENT ? E XPLAIN YOUR ANSWER.