1.  New Public Management In Sri Lanka and Compare With Pakistan and New- Zealand

2. New Public Management

3.  Situation Before Public Sector Reforms  Why These country needed Public Sector Reform  Focusses areas to Develop  How to Overcome this problem(New Public Management Element)  Public Sector Reform In Sri Lanka  Public Sector Reform In Pakistan  Public Sector Reform In New Zealand  What are the Suggestion

4. Situation Before Public Sector Reforms – Continue…..  Administration System/Norm “Welfare First and Growth later”  Advanced welfare Services  Foods  Health  Education

5. Situation Before Public Sector Reforms – Continue…..  Political administrative system (Public Services)  It is centralized for Process rather than outcome  Bureaucratic Approach (Public Services)  Rigid rules  Security than merit for promotion

6. Situation Before Public Sector Reforms – Continue…..  Critical Problem was  Unemployment  High Poverty Levels  Low Growth Rate

7. Main Challenge of This Countries are  Increasing Budget Deficit  Multilateral Pressures  Risk of neo-liberal market economics  Address the rising cost and size of government, Relative to growth of the private sector

8. Focusses areas to Develop  Improving Efficiency and Effectiveness of Public Sector  Combat Corruptions

9. How to Overcome this this problem (Characteristic Of New Public Management ) – Continue…..  Market Based Public Administration  Entrepreneurial Government

10. Characteristic Of New Public Management– Continue…..  Market Based Public Administration  Public Entities Being  Commercialized  Privatized  Contracted Out  Down sizing the Public Sector Organization

11. What are the main achievement of public reform  Providing High Quality Service  Advocating Managerial Autonomy  Demanding, Measuring and Rewording both Organizational  Providing human and Technology Recourses To ensure better Government with Low cost………

12. 1980 DDC 1978 PIDS PC 1973 1971 DPA DDCs 1987 1989-1994 DMS PCP 2000 What Kind of Reform Have Been Taken Since 1970

13. What kind of reform have been taken in Sri Lanka  DDCS – 1971  Divisional Development Councils (DDCS) to Create Local Employment and use Local Resources  DPA – 1973  District Political Authority with Decentralized Budget System  DMS – 1978  District Minister System  DDC – 1980  District Development Councils were Establish with Act  PC - 1987  Provincial Council Act  PCP – 1989-1994  Presidential Committee on Privatizations  PIDS – 2000  Performance and Aptitude Appraisals for Senior Civil Services.

14. Weakness of the Reform – Continue….. DDCS - 1971 Divisional Development Councils  Necessary financial & Managerial Capacity were not Available.  No consistency between interest of local elite objective of decentralization.

15. Weakness of the Reform – Continue….. DMS – 1978 District Minister System  No long term planning.  DMS has very low power.  Lack of Interrelationship between other Institute (Local, Central government)  Political Interests are taken Priority

16. Weakness of the Reform – Continue….. PC – 1987 (13 th Amendment) Provincial Council Act  Lack of Coordination between different levels of Government  Imbalances between Political Institution and Bureaucracy  High Political Influence

17. Weakness of the Reform – Continue….. PCP – 1989- 1994 Presidential Committee on Privatizations  Inadequate institutional arrangement to enforce smooth financial transaction  Minimal safety nets for retrenched workers  Corruption – decline of public accountability  Lack of transparency in public sector

18. Weakness of the Reform – Continue….. Performance and aptitude appraisals  Civil Servant were not ready for development need of the country like New Zealand, UK, Canada, Malesia.

19. What are the Suggestion  Need Managers than Administration, with Communication and Technical skills(IT).  Ministers Should Work with the Bureaucrats (don't use informal channel).  Structure the Local Levels Officials  Establish a Proper Performance Evolution System.  Enforcement of Greater Transparency.  Direct to Smaller Government.

20. Economic Data Year197020002016 Population12.4 million19 million21 million Literacy Rate80%92.6% Life Expectation 70 Years76.8 Years Per Capital income $ 800$ 3639.5 Low income country Middle income country