Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDr Malleswar Rao Kasina Modified over 7 years ago
1
Diagnosis & Management of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Reproductive Period FOGSI Nomenclature (PALM-COEIN CLASSIFICATION) Evidence Based AUB guidelines (GCPR) (An Indian Perspective) Dr Malleswar Rao K
2
Evidence-based Good Clinical Practice Recommendations [GCPR] for Indian women A Gynecologic Endocrine Society of India (GESI) initiative in collaboration with Endocrine Committee of Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Delhi 2 AUB
3
There is a remarkable inconsistency in the management of AUB in day to day clinical practice owing to lack of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines for diagnosis and management of AUB in India. Hence, there is an urgent need for the development of Indian guideline with recommendations on GCP to diagnose and manage AUB. 3 AUB
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9 Normal & Abnormal limits of Menstruation
10
Menstrual parameters Frequency 24-38 day Frequent Normal Infrequent Regularity <20 D / 12 m Absent Regular Irregular Duration 4.5-8 days Prolonged Normal Shortened Volume 5-80 ml Heavy Normal Light Suggested “normal limits” for uterine bleeding in the mid-reproductive years Munro MG. Rev Endocr Metab Disorder (2012) 13: 225-234
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
To standardize nomenclature of AUB, a new system known by the acronym PALM-COEIN (Polyp; Adenomyosis; Leiomyoma; Malignancy and Hyperplasia; Coagulopathy; Ovulatory Disorders; Endometrial factors; Iatrogenic; and Not classified) was introduced in 2011 by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) based on etiopathogenesis. 15 PALM-COEIN CLASSIFICATION
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
The current consensus guidelines have been developed in accordance with the American association of clinical endocrinologists (AACE) protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines. Recommendations are organized aetiology-wise, according to the PALMCOEIN system. They are based on clinical importance and graded (A, B, C, and D), coupled with four intuitive levels of evidence (1, 2, 3, and 4) based on the quality of supporting evidence 20 Grading system of current GCPR
21
21
22
AACE CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES, EVIDENCE RATINGS AND GRADES 22
23
23 Evidence levelEvidence gradeSemantic descriptor 1A Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (MRCT) 1ARandomized controlled trial (RCT) 2B Meta-analysis of nonrandomized prospective or case-controlled trials (MNRCT) 2B Nonrandomized controlled trial (NRCT) 2BProspective cohort study (PCS) 2B Retrospective case-control study (RCCS) 3CCross-sectional study (CSS) 3C Surveillance study (registries, surveys, epidemiologic study, retrospective chart review, mathematical modeling of database) (SS) 3CConsecutive case series (CCS) 3CSingle case report (SCR) 4D No evidence (theory, opinion, consensus, review, or preclinical study) (NE)
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
31
32
32
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
39
39
40
40
41
41
42
42
43
AUB-P (Polyps) Recommendations for management of AUB-P 1. Hysteroscopic polypectomy is recommended for younger women who wish to preserve fertility. (Grade A; Level 1). 2. In women multiple endometrial polyps and not desirous of continued fertility, it is suggested to perform hysteroscopic polypectomy followed by LNG- IUS insertion after confirmation of benign lesion (Grade A ; Level 2). 3. Polyp should be sent for histopathology. If histopathology suggests malignancy, further management should be as AUB-M. 43
44
44 Endometrial Polyp
45
45
46
46
47
1. For managing adenomyosis-A, it is suggested to consider the age, symptomology (AUB, pain and infertility) and association with other conditions (leiomyomas, polyps and endometriosis) 2. In women with AUB-A, desirous of preserving fertility but unwilling for immediate conception, progestogens especially LNG-IUS is recommended as first-line therapy (Grade A; Level 1). 3. In patients with AUB-A, desirous of preserving fertility and resistant to LNG-IUS/ unwilling to use LNG-IUS, gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists with add-back therapy is recommended as second-line therapy (Grade A; Level 1). 47 Recommendations for management of AUB-A
48
4. In patients with AUB-A, and not desirous of preserving fertility, medical management using long-term GnRH agonists and add-back therapy can be initiated. 5. Combined oral contraceptives, danazol, NSAIDs, and progestogens can be offered for symptomatic relief where LNG-IUS and GnRH agonists cannot be indicated (Grade B; Level4). 6. In case of failure/refusal for medical management, vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy is indicated (Grade A; Level 1). 48 Recommendations for management of AUB-A
49
49
50
50
51
51
52
52
53
53
54
Treatment for AUB-L should be individualized because many variables such as age, parity, symptoms, fertility desires may affect the treatment preference. Various options can be generalized as follows: 1. Women with intramural or subserosal myoma (grade2-6), desirous of preserving fertility, can be managed with tranexamic acid or combined oral contraceptives (COCs) or NSAIDs as second-line therapy (Grade A; Level 2). 2. Women with intramural or subserosal myomas (grade2-6) and desirous of preserving fertility can be medically managed with LNG-IUS if other medical treatment fails and patient is not trying to conceive for at least 1 year. (Grade A; Level 1) 3. If treatment fails, or if myoma is causing infertility, myomectomy is recommended by abdominal (open or laparoscopic)/ hysteroscopic route depending on myoma location. (Grade A; Level 3) 54 Recommendations for AUB-L
55
4. For sub-mucosal myomas Grade 0-1, hysteroscopic resection (for 4 cm diameter) is the recommended treatment. (Grade B; Level 4) 5. In women above 40 years of age, not desirous of continued fertility, hysterectomy is the definitive treatment; however medical management including LNG-IUS may be tried in small fibroids (<4 cm diameter) before undergoing definitive surgery. (Grade B; Level 3) 6. For short-term management (up to 6 months), GnRH agonists with add-back therapy is an option in peri-menopausal women, prior to myomectomy or for improving general condition. (Grade A; Level 1) 7. For long-term management of leiyomyomas, it is recommended to use LNG-IUS (except in AUB-L 0 and 1 grade, may be tried in selected cases of AUB-L 2) as first-line management. Newer promising options are progesterone receptor modulators such as ulipristal acetate and low dose mifepristone. (Grade A; Level 1), though these are presently not available in India. 55 Recommendations for AUB-L
56
56
57
57
58
58
59
59 Endometrial Hyperplasia
60
1. In AUB-M with endometrial malignancy, standard protocol for management of malignancy should be followed (Grade B; Level4). 2. In AUB-M with endometrial hyperplasia with atypia, hysterectomy is the standard treatment. (Grade B; Level 2). 3. In AUB-M with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, LNG- IUS can be considered as first-line therapy; oral progestins can be used if LNG-IUS is contraindicated or if patient is unwilling for LNG-IUS(Grade A; Level 1). 60 AUB-M (Malignancy and Endometrial Hyperplasia) Recommendations for AUB-M
61
61
62
62
63
63
64
1.In patients with AUB-C, non-hormonal treatment with tranexamic acid as primary option and hormonal treatment with COCs/LNG-IUS as secondary option* are recommended in consultation with a haematologist, with the following considerations (Grade A; Level 2) a. For patients with uncontrolled uterine bleeding with above medical management, specific factor replacement where possible or desmopressin in refractory cases to be given b. When surgical interventions are indicated, for appropriate pre-, intra- and post-operative management of bleeding *NSAIDs are contraindicated as they can alter platelet function and interact with drugs that might affect liver function and production of clotting factors. * Injectables (GnRH agonists) are contraindicated, except in mild coagulation abnormalities. When administered, prolonged pressure should be applied at injection site (Singh et al 2013). 64 AUB-C (Coagulopathy) Recommendations specific to AUB-C
65
65
66
66
67
1. In women not desiring conception presently, COCs can be used as first-line therapy for 6-12 months (Grade A; Level 1). 2. Cyclic luteal-phase progestins should not be used as a specific treatment in women with AUB-O (Grade A; Level 1) 3. Norethisterone cyclically (for 21 days) is given as initial therapy in acute episodes of bleeding for short-term management of 3 months (Grade B; Level 4). 4. It is suggested to assess response after 1 year of medical management and judge to continue/discontinue existing therapy (Grade B; Level 4). 67 AUB-O (Ovulatory Dysfunction) Recommendations specific to AUB-O
68
5. Surgical intervention is not recommended unless, there is evidence of persistent AUB or failure of medical management to alleviate the condition (Grade A; Level 4). 6. If COCs are contraindicated or patient is unwilling for COCs, LNG-IUS is recommended if she wishes to use it for atleast 1 year (Grade A; Level 1). 7. In adolescents with AUB-O, both hormonal and non-hormonal therapies can be prescribed, (Grade A; Level 4). 68 AUB-O (Ovulatory Dysfunction) Recommendations specific to AUB-O
69
69
70
1. Management of AUB-E can be similar to the management of AUB-O (Grade A; Level 4). 70 AUB-E (Endometrial) Recommendations specific to AUB-E
71
71
72
1. Whenever possible, medications causing AUB should be changed to other alternatives, if no alternatives are available, LNG-IUS is recommended (Grade A; Level 1). 72 AUB-I (Iatrogenic causes) Recommendations specific to AUB –I
73
73
74
1. In patients with idiopathic AUB and desire effective contraception, LNG-IUS is recommended as first-line therapy to reduce menstrual bleeding (Grade A; Level 1). 2. In patients with AUB-N desirous of continued contraception, in whom, LNG-IUS are contraindicated, use of COCs are recommended as second line therapy (Grade A; Level 1). 3. For the management of abnormal uterine bleeding that are mainly cyclic or predictable in timing, non-hormonal options such as NSAIDs and tranexamic acid are recommended (Grade A; Level 1). 4. When medical or conservative surgical treatments (such as ablation) have failed or are contraindicated, and GnRH agonists along with add-back hormone therapy are recommended to reduce idiopathic AUB, while hysterectomy is suggested as last resort (Grade B; Level 4). 5. Uterine Artery embolization is recommended for A-V malformations 74 AUB-N (Not defined) Recommendations for AUB-N
75
75 AV Malformation
76
1. Tranexamic acid is first-line therapy. Other non-hormonal option is NSAIDs (Grade B; Level1). 2. In women desiring effective contraception, LNG-IUS is recommended (Grade A; Level 1). 3. COCs are recommended as second line therapy in patients desiring effective contraception, but unwilling or unsuitable for LNG-IUS (Grade A; Level 4). 4. Cyclic oral progestins (from day 5 to 26), are recommended if COCs are contraindicated (Grade B; Level 1). 5. Centchroman is an option when steroidal hormones and other medical options are not suitable (Grade B; Level 3). 6. Use of cyclic luteal-phase progestins are not recommended for AUB (Grade A; Level 4). 7. GnRH agonists with add-back hormone therapy are recommended as a last resort when medical or surgical treatments for AUB have failed or are contraindicated (Grade B; Level 4). 8. Role of conservative surgery such as ablation has decreased a lot due to availability of LNGIUS which works like medical ablation. 76 AUB-COEIN: General management guidelines: Recommendations of AUB-COEIN
77
77
78
78
79
79
80
80
81
81
82
82
83
83
84
84
85
85
86
86
87
Thanking you !!! 87
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.