Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doctoral education as career preparation? What the evidence suggests

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Doctoral education as career preparation? What the evidence suggests"— Presentation transcript:

1 Doctoral education as career preparation? What the evidence suggests
Lynn McAlpine University of Kent October 2013

2 What external drivers are affecting higher education research and research education?
What are the implications for those preparing the next generation of researchers? What are the concerns of those who imagine becoming academics?

3 What external drivers are affecting higher education, research and research education?

4 External drivers Specific to research Models of knowledge production
Requirements for social impact and engagement Measurement of quantity not quality From curiosity-driven towards more strategic inquiry In social sciences and humanities, the challenge of lack of funding e.g.,LERU, 2012 ; Kalayci, 2012

5 External drivers Specific to research education
University categories: which to prepare PhDs? External drivers PhD for what purpose? Increase in kinds of doctorates BUT not clearly differentiated Policy and accreditation requirements imposing pedagogies Disciplinary efforts but not much change Research councils (funding): from individual to structural support of students, e.g., RCUK, German Excellence initiatives e.g., World Bank, 2006; Park, 2007; Neumann & Tan, 2011

6 What are the concerns do those who imagine becoming academics, including what is missing in PhD education?

7 Changing nature of academic work
Non-traditional work spaces 24/7 ‘Piece work' Disillusionment! Ill-prepared for demands of the PhD Interest in academic careers drops during degree Post-docs more available but not a stepping stone What are the alternatives? What focus? Competing views … Disciplinary  inter-disciplinary Qualitative  quantitative Single scholar  team research To what purpose? Tensions… Scholar, researcher, knowledge worker e.g., Cantwell, 2011; Mason et al, 2009; Nerad et al, 2007; Neumann & Tan, 2011

8 What’s missing in doctoral education? Teaching Career development
Academic communication: varied genres – reading and writing Ethics: approval but not day-to-day practice Management skills Research design skills Policy: invisible to junior researchers e.g., Malfroy, 2005; Jones, 2008

9 What are the implications for those preparing the next generation of researchers?

10 Getting the balance right: Impact on the curriculum
Purpose of PhD? Scholar  competent researcher Reduced time? Significant original contribution  do-able project Play it safe  take risks Research education: PhD student  post-doc (1) How does doctoral education fit within research education? Quality: What it is? How will it be tracked? Easy to measure  worthwhile to measure Graduate institutions

11 Getting the balance right: Impact on the curriculum
Admissions processes (2) Past accomplishments  future learning Alignment of student and program purposes Choice of supervisor: Who and when? Cohort? Supervision: who is responsible? ( 3) Student  supervisor  institution What’s missing? What’s do-able? (4) Teaching, careers, communication, ethics, management skills, research design skills, policy Imagining the future, e.g., technologies Graduate institutions

12 Getting the balance right Who owns research education?
Graduate schools Faculties of graduate study Internal research units or centres External research organizations Externally-funded training centres or schools University program linked to business/industry Graduate institutions Pedagogy  Knowledge production

13 Where, what next?

14 Where, what next? Workplace learning: “Reciprocal interaction between the individual and the workplace …determines learning.” (Tynjala, 2008, 141)

15 1. Research education: PhD student  post-doc
Possible pedagogies 1. Research education: PhD student  post-doc Researcher development framework: 2. Admissions processes Changes in admissions processes: Maher, M., & Barnes, B. (2010). Assessing doctoral applicants' readiness for doctoral-level work. Assessment today, 22(5), 8-10. Choosing supervisor in first year: EUI code of practice 3. Supervision: Who is responsible? Distributed responsibility between student and supervisor: OU postgraduate code of practice Distributed responsibility between student, supervisor, department: Canadian Association of Graduate Studies contract Termly reporting by student and supervisor to Director Graduate Studies: Oxford GSS Just-in-time support for students and supervisors: Oxford supervision website

16 4. What’s missing? What’s do-able?
Possible pedagogies 4. What’s missing? What’s do-able? Careers: Academic: Alternate: (good links from this page; (more general career info) Ethical case studies Writing resources: for non-English speakers: resources; see also online resources


Download ppt "Doctoral education as career preparation? What the evidence suggests"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google