Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Karim Touijer, MD, MPH, FACS.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Karim Touijer, MD, MPH, FACS."— Presentation transcript:

1 Karim Touijer, MD, MPH, FACS.
Rationale for Radical Prostatectomy for Noncastrate Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Karim Touijer, MD, MPH, FACS. Attending Surgeon Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Professor of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College, New York

2 Newly diagnosed synchronous M1 prostate cancer
Decreased incidence in PSA era (60%20%)1 Wu et al, 2014 California cancer registry, , primary outcome OS, secondary CSS 1Wu et al., (2014).Cancer 120(6):

3 Standard Treatment is Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)
Newly diagnosed synchronous M1 prostate cancer Standard Treatment is Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Results are predictably poor !

4 Newly diagnosed synchronous M1 prostate cancer is highly lethal
5 –year disease-specific survival ~ 35% 1 5-year overall survival ~ 28% 1 Wu et al, 2014 California cancer registry, , primary outcome OS, secondary CSS 1Wu et al., (2014).Cancer 120(6):

5 Systemic Prostate Cancer Treatment in 2015: Multiple Therapies Proven to Prolong Life in Metastatic CRPC are Being Studied in Earlier “Non-Castrate” States Non-castrate Castration resistant Rising PSA Castration Resistant Metastatic 1st-Line Docetaxel 2004 Pre- Provenge 2010 Abiraterone 2012 Alpharadin 2013 Enzalutamide 2014 Clinically Localized Disease Non- CRPC Clinical Metastases: Noncastrate Post- Cabazitaxel 2011 Pre-Operative Neo- Adjuvant Post-Operative Ipilimumab 2015 Modified from Scher and Heller. Urology

6 Surgery Newly Diagnosed Non-Castrate Radiation Therapy
07/12/09 Radiation Therapy Systemic Therapy Docetaxol Cabazitaxel Sipuleucel-T Radium-223 Abiraterone Acetate Enzalutamide Surgery Clinical Metastases: Castrate Newly Diagnosed Non-Castrate Death from Disease > Death other causes

7 Systemic therapy + Surgical control of Primary site
Control of the Primary Tumor in Combination with Effective Systemic Therapy in advanced malignancies Systemic therapy Systemic therapy + Surgical control of Primary site Overall survival P-value Renal cell carcinoma1 Interferon-alpha + Radical nephrectomy 7 vs. 17 mo 0.03 Ovarian cancer2 Platinum <25% cytoreduction >75% cytoreduction 22.7 vs mo 0.001 Colon cancer3 5-FU + leucovorin Aggressive excision/HIPEC 12.6 vs 22.3 mo RCC: EORTC trial, IFNa + nephrectomy, or IFNa alone 1 Lancet. 2001;358(9286):966-70 2J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(5): 3J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:

8 5-yr Disease Specific Survival
A Survival Benefit for Local Therapy Including Radical Prostatectomy Was Suggested in Men With Documented Stage IV (M1a–c) PCa at Diagnosis in SEER (2004–2010) N 5-yr Overall Survival 5-yr Disease Specific Survival Radical Prostatectomy 245 67.4% 75.8% Brachytherapy 129 52.6% 61.3% No Surgery or Radiotherapy 7811 22.5% 48.7% M1a: Nonregional nodes; M1b: Bone +/- nodes; M1c: Distant Culp SH et al. Eur Urol. 65: 1088, 2014.

9 Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With Minimal Metastatic Disease
A (RP) B (No RP) Number of Patients Age (42-69) (47-83) Follow-up (mos) (7-75) (28-96) Time to CRPC (mos) (9-65) (16-59) p=0.04 Time to clinical progression (mos) p=0.032 Cancer specific survival % % p=0.043 Local surgical palliation % 29% MMD: Clinically localized, 3 or fewer bone metastasis, and no visceral disease; Comparable: Clinical stage, Gleason score, PSA and extent of metastases Who Respond to ADT Prolongs the Time to CRPC and Clinical Progression, Improves Cancer Specific Survival and Reduces the Need for Local Surgical Palliation but longer f/u in no RP group and patients were not randomized. Heidenreich et al: J Urol 2014.

10 Patient selection When the predicted cancer specific mortality risk exceeds 70%, local treatment provides no benefit NCDB Löppenberg Eur Urol 2016

11 Patient selection Löppenberg Eur Urol 2016

12 The Therapeutic Objective
To eliminate disease that is incurable by a single modality with a multimodality approach.

13 Newly Diagnosed Noncastrate Metastatic Prostate Cancer
ADT is standard first line therapy Results with ADT are predictably poor 5 new agents with distinct mechanisms of action each shown to prolong survival Despite great insight into the disease, None were successful at completely halting the disease Role of Surgical Tx of the primary site remains untested

14 Androgen Deprivation Therapy Is and Remains the First-Line Standard Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Disease Overall outcomes are inversely related to disease burden ADT alone does not eliminate metastatic disease Systemic therapy alone does not eradicate the primary tumor Even in the neo-adjuvant setting, prostates removed after up to 8 months of treatment are rarely tumor-free.

15 MSKCC Pilot Study Objectives
Primary: To assess the safety and feasibility of radical prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy in highly-selected M1 prostate cancer patients with limited metastatic burden and good response to primary therapy Secondary: Achievement of durable undetectable PSA Touijer, O’Shaunessy, Scher, Scardino AUA abstract

16 Patient selection and multimodal schema
Metastatic burden assessed by whole-body MRI or PET-CT Androgen deprivation therapy At least 4 months primary ADT Surgical management RP and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy all patients Bilateral RPLND for patients with retroperitoneal mets >2 cm Targeted Radiotherapy cGy to bone metastasis in some patients

17 Baseline cohort characteristics (n=20)
Baseline characteristics Age, median (years) 61.0 (IQR 55.6, 64.7) Frequency Percent Clinical presentation Elevated PSA 11 (55%) LUTS 6 (30%) Pain 3 (15%) PSA at diagnosis (ng/mL) <10 9 (45%) 10-20 4 (20%) >20 7 (35%) Gleason grade at diagnosis 5 (25%) 8 9-10 Clinical T stage T1 1 (5%) T2 T3 12 (60%) Frequency % Clinical N stage N0 5 (25%) N1 15 (75%) Site of distant metastasis Bone only 13 (65%) RP nodes only 3 (15%) Bone + RP nodes 4 (20%) Number of bony metastases* 1 8 (40%) 2 >2 This information is relevant to surgeons. Gives an idea of disease at presentation and resectability * 9 bx confirmed bone mets

18 Details of multimodal disease management
Androgen Deprivation Therapy Months IQR Duration neoadjuvant ADT, median 3.8 (2.7, 5.3) Frequency Percent Neoadjuvant ADT type Combined androgen blockade 11 60% CAB + abiraterone 2 10% LHRH agonist/antagonist 3 15% LHRH + abiraterone None 1 5% Duration primary ADT (months) <6 6-9 7 35% >9 Continuous 9 55% Surgical Management Months IQR Time to surgery, median 3.9 (3.0, 5.5) Frequency Percent PSA at time of surgery <0.2 ng/mL 8 40% >0.2 ng/mL 11 55% Unknown 1 5% Surgical procedure RP+PLND 16 (80%) RP+PLND+RPLND 4 (20%) Radiotherapy Frequency Percent Radiotherapy target Bony metastasis 10 (50%) Bone and pelvis 4 (20%) None 6 (30%) Time to RP median 3.9 mo (IQR 3.0, 5.5), same with radiotherapy; time to surgery duration neoadj ADT separate?

19 Extended LN Dissection for Advanced PCa
In selected patients with pelvic and/or retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy with or without limited bone metastases, we have performed extended LN dissection up to the renal hilum in conjunction with systemic therapy (ADT +/- immunotherapy) and radiation of bone metastases

20 Outcomes of Surgery Frequency Percent Pathologic outcomes
Extracapsular extension positive 17 85% Seminal vesicle invasion positive 11 55% Surgical margin positive 6 30% Number positive lymph nodes (median 1.0, IQR ) 8 40% 1 4 20% 2 0% >2 Surgical complications Any, within 90 days 5% Urinary continence (no pads) Continent within 12 months 15 75% Continent at last follow-up Local recurrence

21 Early oncologic outcomes
Median follow-up = 18.7 months (IQR 10.0, 32.8) Frequency Percent No evidence of progression 11 55% Currently on primary ADT 5 ADT discontinued 6 Progression after ADT discontinued 25% New metastasis 3 Initiation of chemotherapy Re-initiation of ADT 2 Progression on ADT 4 20% 1 - Progression= new mets or restart ADT or initiation of chemoTx,

22 ADT discontinued without evidence of progression
Patient Follow-up from RP (months) Time since last ADT (months) Most recent PSA (ng/mL) Serum T (ng/dL) 1 9 7 0.95 399 2 16 10 <0.05 119 3 29 23 596 4 12 6 0.68 153 5 44 37 0.15 413 <1 <10 53 y/o, 2700 cGy to pubis, Solitary bone met with pos bone biopsy, neg LN on RP, psa 0.07 at RP, pT3b

23 53 y/o, PSA 6.9, Bx Gl. 9 cT3bN1M1b Solitary bone met (Bx +),
Lupron followed by Abiraterone Acetate (9 months) PSA 0.07 at RP, pT3bNo (0/24 Ln) Neuroendocrine features 2700 cGy to pubis PSA <0.05, Testosterone 596

24 58 YO - T3b, N1, M1b Gleason 9 Disease With
Bone Metastases Confirmed by Biopsy Radical Prostatectomy Focal RT Off systemic therapy 4+ Years – Undetectable PSA CAB Abiraterone – Incomplete T suppression On systemic therapy Did this patient benefit from radical surgery?

25 58 YO - T3a, N1, M1b Gleason 9 Disease With
Bone Metastases (Sternum and T Spine) Confirmed by Biopsy Off systemic Therapy 3.5 years RT Radical Prostatectomy CAB PSA Detectable at 2.3 years On systemic therapy Did this patient benefit from radical surgery?

26 Combining Ipilimumab and Degarelix with RP to Potentially Cure Patients with Metastatic Non-Castrate Prostate Cancer ADT to maximize the apoptotic response: release of tumor antigens: prime cancer-specific T cells Ipilimumab to promote durable anti-tumor responses RP to provide control of the primary tumor site and separately, to further promote antigen release to enhance the immune response

27 Radiation Therapy to the Primary Site Was Recently Added as ARM H in STAMPEDE
Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy Parker et al., Clin Onc 23:318, 2013

28 Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)
PEACE-1 GETUG EORTC: European Phase III Trial of Abiraterone (+/- DOCETAXEL) and Local RXT in patients with de novo metastatic prostate cancer ADT + Abiraterone 1000mg Prednisone 5mg BID +/- docetaxel Co-primary endpoints: Overall survival and Progression Free Survival Local radiotherapy R A N D O M I Z E D Patients with newly diagnosed (hormone naïve) metastatic CaP 916 patients planned Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + Abiraterone-Pred Study 302: Design Study 302 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with metastatic CRPC who are naïve to chemotherapy Planned enrollment is for 1000 patients Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either abiraterone acetate 1000 mg daily or placebo, and prednisone 10 mg daily The co-primary end points are a 50% improvement in radiologic progression-free survival and 25% improvement in overall survival Efficacy assessment in radiologic progression-free survival will utilize sequential imaging studies as suggested by PCWG2 bone scan and modified RECIST criteria (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) Survival data will be collected throughout the study treatment phase and during follow-up Secondary end points are time to opiate use for cancer-related pain, time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy, time to deterioration of ECOG performance status ≥ 1 point, time to PSA progression, and presence or absence of TMPRSS2-ERG in primary tumors or CTCs Study sponsor: Unicancer Courtesy of K Fizazi 28

29 Randomized, Phase II Trial of Best Systemic Therapy or Best Systemic Therapy (BST) Plus Definitive Treatment (Radiation or Surgery) of the Primary Tumor in Metastatic (M1) Prostate Cancer (or Surgery) ADT x 6 months, randomize to continued BST or Local Therapy Primary endpoint is progression-free survival, defined as the time interval from the start of initial best systemic therapy (BST) treatment to the date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.

30 Radical Prostatectomy in Metastatic Disease
1. Not for everyone but certainly for some. 2. Phase 3 trials are ongoing: MDACC Multicenter: Responders STAMPEDE: ADT + RT 3. The phase 2 presented here enables a promising approaches to be identified rapidly. 4. The results inform the decision to proceed with a definitive trial.


Download ppt "Karim Touijer, MD, MPH, FACS."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google