1. T&R Packet Preparation and Design Workshop
The Faculty Center
Bonnie angelone
Senate T&R chairperson
Kevin dahm

2. Initial items Checklist Application Form Curriculum Vitae
Executive Summary (see examples)

3. Initial items (cont.) 5. Job Description (from your hire)
Be sure to review this throughout your process
6. Courses taught and adjusted load (use form)
7. Approved Department Tenure/Recontracting Document

4. 8: Teaching/Professional Performance
Self-assessment
Student evaluations (current cycle) & candidate’s response
Peer evaluations (current cycle) & candidate’s response
Student evaluations (all prior cycles)
Peer evaluations (all prior cycles)
Plans for future growth

5. Who are you as a teacher?
Highlight your primary responsibilities and the type of students you have had the most contact with.
What are the goals for you as a teacher?
What are goals you have for your students?
What does a typical day in your class look like?
Provide specific examples
What are some classroom techniques that you use?
Evidence can be provided throughout

6. Types of Evidence Student evaluations Peer evaluations
Mid-semester focus
Awards
Letter from class visitor
s from students
Other you may have? (THINK-PAIR-SHARE)

7. Organizational Notes Use headings to separate information
From departmental document and/or MOA
Examples: summary; courses taught; teaching philosophy; academic instruction; developing as a teacher; developing learning activities; lectures; assessments; by course name…
Candidate responses-- spend an appropriate amount of time on less than desirable student ratings– be holistic
Graphics can make information easier to read (examples ahead)
RESPOND EXPLICITLY to action items recommended in prior reviews

8. Example graphic of evidence

9. Example graphic of evidence
Item
Course name
Semester
My mean/Department mean/College mean
Overall rating of the quality of instruction in the course
Geography 101
Fall 2016
4.5/4.21/4.14
Level of student learning achieved
4.85/4.01/3.89
Mapping 101
4.5/4.36/4.26
4.2/4.21/4.35

10. Example graphic of evidence

11. 9: Scholarly/Creative Activity or Professional Development
Self-assessment
External review (fourth cycle, Scholarly/Creative Activity only)
Plans for future growth

12. Who Are You as a Scholar/Professional?
“Elevator pitch” on your area(s) of scholarly/creative activity/professional development (THINK-PAIR-SHARE)
Evidence of success and productivity
Ambitious and sustainable future scholarly agenda

13. Types of Evidence Letters from external evaluators
Context about your journals and conference proceedings
Impact factors
Rigor of review/Acceptance rates
Awards
Student accomplishments
Graphs and charts of your total numbers
Other external sources of validation
Rowan digital works
Have a website? Report how many views it gets
Reviews of your work
Links to work

14. Organizational Notes
Single narrative, or separate section for each “type” of activity
Lists of accomplishments
Don’t merge fundamentally different things into one list
Make sure citations are consistent with CV
Highlight student co-authors
RESPOND EXPLICITLY to action items recommended in prior reviews.

15. Use your citation here… *Impact Factor: 2.189
Ongoing Research
1) Diabetes Management
The first project is one for which I received an R21 grant from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development division (NICHD) to explore the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an Internet-based contingency management intervention to improve blood glucose testing in teenagers diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes. Recruitment for this study took place at the Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center in New York City. I worked with post-doctoral fellows (name, name) of the National Development and Research Institutes and a statistician (name) of the Research Triangle Institutes on writing the manuscript from this study. We found that all teens enrolled in the study showed improvements in the number of glucose tests taken per day after receiving a very brief motivational interviewing session; however, participants in an incentive group showed significantly more increases in the number of glucose tests taken during treatment (especially younger participants), relative to a control group. Older participants, regardless of group assignment, were more likely to show a trajectory of maintaining increased blood glucose testing.
Deliverables
Since Last Review
Type
Citation/Title
Notes
Publication
Use your citation here…
*Impact Factor: 2.189
*I was the senior author on this paper, leading the team in terms conducting the research, as well as the analyses and write up of the manuscript
Funded Grant
NIH R21HD061683
$125,000/yr (direct),
Media
Add link here…
Conference presentation
Name conference here…

16. Example graphic for deliverables
Pre-Rowan
Assistant professor
Associate professor
TOTAL
Publications: 3 9 8 20
1st author journal 1 2 4 7
2nd author journal
3rd plus author journal
Book chapter
Newsletter
Presentations at research conferences: 25 68
101
1st author 13 21
Non 1st author collaboration 5 14
Student 1st author na 16 50 66
Student presentations at local conferences: 18 28 46
Rowan University 17 45
Other University
Grant applications submitted (funded):
2(1)
11(6)
13(7)
Principal/Co-Investigator external
0(0)
5(1)
6(1)
Consultant external
1(0)
2(0)
Principal/Co-Investigator internal
1(1)
5(5)
6(6)

17. Example graphic for deliverables

18. 10: Service to University Community
Self-assessment
Plans for future growth

19. 10: Service to University Community
Self-assessment
Why have your chosen particular areas of service
Explain scope of the contribution if not self explanatory
Plans for future growth
Leadership opportunities

20. 11: Service to Wider and Professional Community
Self-assessment
Why have your chosen particular areas of service
Explain scope of the contribution if not self explanatory
Plans for future growth
Leadership opportunities

21. 12. Departmental/Committee evaluation, numerical vote
Make sure numerical vote is clearly indicated and that evaluation form is signed
Minority report should be included if not unanimous vote

22. 13. Previous Evaluations (as applicable)
First review (Department/Office, Dean/Supervisor)
Second review (Department/Office, Dean/Supervisor, Senate, Dean, Provost)
Third review (Department/Office, Dean/Supervisor, Senate, Dean, Provost)

23. 14. Supplemental Folder Representative publications
Correspondence regarding “pending” items
Letters of thanks
s from current/former students
Other examples?