Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

iHEA 9th World Congress Sydney, July 8, 2013

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "iHEA 9th World Congress Sydney, July 8, 2013"— Presentation transcript:

1 iHEA 9th World Congress Sydney, July 8, 2013
Generic Competition in the United States and New Zealand Pharmaceutical Markets: A Comparative Analysis Bander Balkhi, PharmD International Center for Pharmaceutical Economic and Policy Massachusetts College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences iHEA 9th World Congress Sydney, July 8, 2013

2 Affordable Medicines Research Institute
Generic Competition in the United States and New Zealand Pharmaceutical Markets: A Comparative Analysis Enrique Seoane-Vazquez, PhD International Center for Pharmaceutical Economic and Policy Massachusetts College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences Rosa Rodriguez-Monguio, PhD School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Sheryl L. Szeinbach, PhD College of Pharmacy, Ohio State University Bander Balkhi, PharmD International Center for Pharmaceutical Economic and Policy Massachusetts College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences Project Funded by Affordable Medicines Research Institute

3 Outline Introduction Objectives Methods Results Discussion
Conclusions and Limitations

4 Role of Generic Medicines
Generic medicines play an important role in promoting innovation and ensuring affordability of and accessibility to healthcare treatments Generics may enter the market after patent and market exclusivities expiration Barriers to generic entry should be eliminated

5 Generic Utilization in Selected Countries (2008)
% Generic Volume OECD Health Policy Studies, Pharmaceutical Pricing Policies in a Global Market, 2008

6 Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC) and Generic Drugs
Decides which drugs are subsidized by the government One of the most advanced pharmaceutical management systems Generic drug policy is a critical element of PHARMAC activities NZ had the lowest prices of patented & generic drugs of 9 developed countries Source: PHARMAC 2012 Annual Review.

7 The Intellectual Property of Medicines in NZ and US
The US has established a intellectual property regulation that increases the length of patents and exclusivity New Zealand applies the general patent system to pharmaceuticals WTO and other multinational trade agreements set a global intellectual property regulation for pharmaceuticals

8 Differences in IP Regulation of Medicines in NZ and US
Same general regulatory patent life 20 years from patent filing 1 year of provisional patent / right of priority from filing in a foreign country Up to 5 years in patent extension for medicines in the US Exclusivity (i.e. data protection) 12 years for biologics in the US 3-5 years for new drugs in the US 5 years for new molecular entities in NZ

9 Outline Introduction Objectives Methods Results Discussion
Conclusions and Limitations

10 Objectives To compare the intellectual property (IP) regulations of pharmaceuticals between the United States (US) and New Zealand (NZ) To assess the impact of the IP regulations on generic competition in both countries

11 Outline Introduction Objectives Methods Results Discussion
Conclusions and Limitations

12 Sources of Data FDA Orange Book, 2007-2012
US Patent and Trade Mark Office IMS Health Sales Data, US The Intellectual Property Office of NZ NZ Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority (Medsafe) Data updated to Dec 31, 2012

13 Methods Descriptive statistics
Differences in generic competition and generic entry dates t-test and chi-square test Significance level set at 0.05

14 Outline Introduction Objectives Methods Results Discussion
Conclusions and Limitations

15 Sample 169 products in the top 125 by $ sales in NZ in the period 13 (7.7%) Not marketed in the US and excluded from analysis 156 (92.3%) products included in the analysis 138 (88.5%) Marketed in NZ and US 18 (11.5%) Biologics

16 Country of First Approval of Branded Products
First Approved in NZ 48 (32.7%) First Approved in US 98 (66.7%) Approved at the Same Time 1 (0.7%) N=147

17 Generic in Both Countries
Generic Competition Generic in Both Countries 47 (30.1%) Generic in US Only 25 (16.0%) Generic in NZ Only 10 (6.4%) No Generic 56 (35.9%) Biologics 18 (11.5%) N=156

18 Products with Generic Competition
Number of Products n= 156 33.7% p= 0.085

19 Time from Patent Expiration to First Generic Entry
Years from Patent Expiration 2.0 ± 2.4 yrs. US NZ -1.1 ± 2.8 yrs. p < 0.001

20 NZ Patent Expiration and Generic Entry
After Patent Expiration 42 (97.7%) Before Patent Expiration 1 (2.3%) N=43

21 US Patent Expiration and Generic Entry
Same Day of Patent Expiration 16 (26.7%) Before Patent Expiration 24 (40.0%) After Patent Expiration 20 (33.3%) N=60

22 Outline Introduction Objectives Methods Results Discussion
Conclusions and Limitations

23 Generic Competition in NZ and the US
The US has more patent and exclusivity protection but faster generic entry Generic entry prior to patent expiration in the US and after expiration in NZ

24 Generic Competition in NZ and the US
US is the largest market and NZ is one of the smaller markets Price controls and tendering Lack of incentives for disputing invalid patents in court in NZ

25 PHARMAC Role in Patent Disputes
Involvement in court patent disputes between pharmaceutical companies Recent proactive stance Researching when patents expiration Considering challenging invalid patents Dedicated funds to pursue these actions Source: PHARMAC 2012 Annual Review.

26 Biosimilar Competition
Biologics share of pharmaceutical expenditures is growing Biologics did not have a pathway for generic approval in the US in the period of the analysis (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 2010) Biosimilars are available in NZ filgrastim first biosimilar in NZ

27 Outline Introduction Objectives Methods Results Discussion
Conclusions and Limitations

28 Differences in Generic Competition
US had more stringent IP regulation of pharmaceuticals and longer patent and exclusivity monopoly periods US had more generic competition Generic entry typically occurred before patent expiration in the US Patents listed by pharmaceutical companies are often invalid

29 Limitations of the Study
Relatively small sample of products Difficult to generalize to the rest of products, specially biologics Need for more research assessing how differences in market characteristics, reimbursement mechanisms and regulation affect generic competition

30 iHEA 9th World Congress Sydney, July 8, 2013
Generic Competition in the United States and New Zealand Pharmaceutical Markets: A Comparative Analysis Bander Balkhi, PharmD International Center for Pharmaceutical Economic and Policy Massachusetts College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences iHEA 9th World Congress Sydney, July 8, 2013


Download ppt "iHEA 9th World Congress Sydney, July 8, 2013"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google