Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
End of life care in Parkinson’s disease
Dr Peter Fletcher Gloucestershire NHS Click here to continue
2
normal ageing normal heterogeneous but can be modified
changes the clinical picture Click here to continue
3
dopamine levels with age
Click here to continue
4
diseases commoner in older people have: - a rising incidence - a rising prevalence
Click here to continue
5
prevalence of Pd Iceland Aberdeen, UK Carlisle UK Northampton, UK 500
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 >80 Click here to continue
6
Click here to continue ONS, NRS, NISRA Mid-year population estimates 1985, 2010; ONS National Population Projections 2035, 2010-based
7
predisposing factors & Pd
when does confusion occur others UTI heart failure age Click here to continue
8
partnerships in Pd geriatrician OT PD Nurse Person with PD Family
The Cure Parkinson’s Trust Physiotherapy Social Worker OT psychiatrist PD Nurse Person with PD Family Dietician Friends Carers Health Visitor District Nurse Psychologist neurologist GP SALT pharmacist ■ Walker & Bowron 2004 Click here to continue 8 8
9
key priorities referral, diagnosis and review
people with suspected PD should be referred quickly and untreated to a specialist diagnosis of PD should be reviewed regularly and reconsidered if atypical clinical features develop The guideline lists several recommendations that have been identified as priorities for implementation. KEY PRIORITIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION People with suspected PD should be referred quickly and untreated to a specialist with expertise in the differential diagnosis of this condition. The Guideline Development Group considered that people with suspected mild Parkinson’s disease should be seen within 6 weeks; new referrals in later disease with more complex problems require an appointment within 2 weeks. The diagnosis of PD should be reviewed regularly and reconsidered if atypical clinical features develop. The Guideline Development Group considered that people diagnosed with PD should be seen at regular intervals of 6–12 months to review their diagnosis. Acute levodopa and apomorphine challenge tests should not be used in differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes. Click here to continue ww.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/10984/30087/30087.pdf 5/242
10
Pd & non motor gastro- intestinal problems autonomic disorders sensory
symptoms of sleep neuro- psychiatric Pd & non motor Click here to continue
11
Click here to continue Movement Disorders:Vol 23, No 6,
12
?cognitive function? Click here to continue
Movement Disorders:Vol 23, No 6, 12
13
Click here to continue Movement Disorders:Vol 23, No 6,
14
10% suddenly - 90% prolonged illness
... how many of us … … die a sudden death ... ? 10% suddenly - 90% prolonged illness 70% want to die at home; <20% do 1:6 of us in a care home (NCPC 2010) Pd hugely overrepresented among the latter (Bowman et al 1990) Click here to continue
15
Kempster PA et al Brain 2007;130: Click here to continue
16
Parkinson’s time course
■ MacMahon Fletcher Thomas Lee 2005 Parkinson’s time course e d u c a t i o n interprofessional interventions drug Rx NMS diagnosis maintenance complex palliative advanced directives advanced care planning AND etc feeding – PEGs etc wearing off dyskinesia Click here to continue 16
17
Palliative care in Parkinson’s disease
… in the absence of any curative treatment the management of Pd remains largely palliative … … the principles of palliative care should be applied throughout the course of the disease and not limited to the terminal end-of-life period … The guideline lists several recommendations that have been identified as priorities for implementation. KEY PRIORITIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION People with suspected PD should be referred quickly and untreated to a specialist with expertise in the differential diagnosis of this condition. The Guideline Development Group considered that people with suspected mild Parkinson’s disease should be seen within 6 weeks; new referrals in later disease with more complex problems require an appointment within 2 weeks. The diagnosis of PD should be reviewed regularly and reconsidered if atypical clinical features develop. The Guideline Development Group considered that people diagnosed with PD should be seen at regular intervals of 6–12 months to review their diagnosis. Acute levodopa and apomorphine challenge tests should not be used in differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes. Click here to continue ww.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/10984/30087/30087.pdf 5/242
18
Palliative care in Parkinson’s disease
Issues: physical, social, psychological, existential Pd pallative phase has been defined by: inability to tolerate dopaminergic medication unsuitability for surgery presence of advanced comorbidity The guideline lists several recommendations that have been identified as priorities for implementation. KEY PRIORITIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION People with suspected PD should be referred quickly and untreated to a specialist with expertise in the differential diagnosis of this condition. The Guideline Development Group considered that people with suspected mild Parkinson’s disease should be seen within 6 weeks; new referrals in later disease with more complex problems require an appointment within 2 weeks. The diagnosis of PD should be reviewed regularly and reconsidered if atypical clinical features develop. The Guideline Development Group considered that people diagnosed with PD should be seen at regular intervals of 6–12 months to review their diagnosis. Acute levodopa and apomorphine challenge tests should not be used in differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes. Click here to continue ww.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/10984/30087/30087.pdf
19
Click here to continue Turner-Stokes et al. Clin Med;7(2)
20
P R I M A Y C E T PDNS Click here to continue
21
thinking ahead education early and ongoing to avoid unrealistic expectations avoid [motor] disease-centric approach non medical aspects critical legal poor communication by patient no acute worsening = something else Click here to continue
22
survival in Pd cannot predict lifespan in Pd patients
can predict disease trajectory if Δ correct L dopa has increased survival from 7.5 years to >15 years and still increasing L dopa has halved excess mortality from 3 to 1.5 Click here to continue Hoehn and Yahr neurology 1967;17: )
23
issues follow up key to understanding trajectory
who does the palliative care in Pd patient/problem list > disease conundrums nutrition bed bound sores/contractures care homes post death support of family and carers for the family when does the patient die? Click here to continue
24
approaching death in Pd
pain drooling immobility and falls dysphagia and weight loss chest/urine infections exhaustion frailty Click here to continue
25
pain rigidity dystonia dyskinesia wearing off akathisia
musculoskeletal poor positioning/skin breakdown neuropathic Click here to continue
26
drooling 1.5L saliva per day 25% parotid (serous)
70% submaxillary (serous/mucin) Autonomic (parasympatheic) control Click here to continue
27
drooling secondary to posture and poor swallowing consequences:
for speech for eating embarrassment soiling of clothes lip irritation +/- secondary infection aspiration, coughing, fear (PEG useless) Click here to continue
28
drooling physio re posture SALT re swallowing anticholinergics
tablets spray patch botulinum radiotherapy Click here to continue
29
motor decision time immobile but ‘safe’ mobile but ‘unsafe’ … do we increase, reduce or maintain the medication? Click here to continue
30
psychosis decision time
immobile but ‘sane’ mobile but ‘psychotic’ … do we increase, reduce or maintain the medication? Click here to continue
31
drugs used Levo dopa - dopamine agonist - MAOBI - COMTI
Click here to continue
32
disease trajectory disease duration Click here to continue
33
the ‘end’ ... Pd patients will survive if every ‘opportunity for death’ is aggressively treated ... Palliative Care in Neurology; 2004 Click here to continue
34
logic & end-of-life decisions
cpr ventilation antibiotics feeding fluids Click here to continue
35
Parkinson’s time course
■ MacMahon Fletcher Thomas Lee 2005 Parkinson’s time course e d u c a t i o n interprofessional interventions drug Rx NMS diagnosis maintenance complex palliative advanced directives advanced care planning AND etc feeding – PEGs etc wearing off dyskinesia Click here to continue 35
36
advance care planning advance statement of wishes or preferences of care advance decision to refuse treatment appoint a Health & Welfare Attorney under a Lasting Power of Attorney put your trust in your doctor, PDNS and the rest of the team caring for you End
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.