Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Modified Copy of Lecture Note from

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Modified Copy of Lecture Note from"— Presentation transcript:

1 Modified Copy of Lecture Note from
Thursday 15th February 2007 Topics: Heat Conductivity of Electrons Comment: Reproduced from last year in february 2008 PHYS page 1

2 Lecture Thursday 15th February 2007
Topics Last Lecture: * Heat conductivity due to phonons * phonons * anharmonicity - heat expansion * anharmonicity - PHONON SCATTERING Topics today: (Lorentz number factor 2 ( i.e. 2 pi2/9 )differences ) Electronic motion Classical Electron Gas model (Drude) Heat and electrical conductivity of electrons a) HEAT CONDUCTIVITY - see phonons b) electrical conductivity Drift velocity from acceleration Conductivity (relation to resistance) Wiedemann-Franz law derived Lorenz number CLASSICAL ASSUMPTIONS: a) the gas heat capacity (related to Boltzmann) b) velocity squared replaced by kT Conductivity (sigma) New Aspect: in the literature, there is a strong disagreement about what is "average velocity". It results in a factor 2 ( i.e. 2 pi2/9 ) difference in the so called Lorentz number. PHYS page 2

3 Three components : velocity, mean free path, heat capacity
Heat conductivity from the model (one before last lecture): Three components : velocity, mean free path, heat capacity From PHYS264 Mean Free Path PHYS page 3

4 From Today N/V is called density n PHYS page 4

5 PHYS page 5

6 From Today PHYS page 6

7 factor 2 ( i.e. 2 pi2/9 ) difference from our derivation
From Hyperphysics factor 2 ( i.e. 2 pi2/9 ) difference from our derivation In our PDF textbook: factor 2 ( i.e. 2 pi2/9 ) difference PHYS page 7

8 Solid State Physics [3C25] Tony Harker, Chiranijib Mitra and Andrew Horsfield (pages 117)
PHYS page 8

9 factor 2 ( i.e. 2 pi2/9 ) larger than our derivation
There are the following groups: 1. Kittel's book -> Wikipedia -> Hyperphysics -> Tony Harker et al -> some new textbooks factor 2 ( i.e. 2 pi2/9 ) larger than our derivation 2. Ashcroft&Mermin -> Burns -> Hemmer -> our derivation The difference is in the value of "average velocity". Wikipedia gives (2007) a nice review of the three velocities: Most probable, Average speed and Root Mean Square. The "Physical" is the root mean square, clearly, it relates to average energy. If we assume thet all particles have the velocity, this assumption must at least conserve the total energy! (It might be possible to argue for the average speed too .....) PHYS page 9

10 The difference is in the value of "average velocity"
The difference is in the value of "average velocity". Wikipedia gives (2007) a nice review of the three velocities: Most probable, Average speed and Root Mean Square. The "Physical" is the root mean square, clearly, it relates to average energy. If we assume thet all particles have the velocity, this assumption must at least conserve the total energy! (But it might be possible to argue for the average speed too .....) PHYS page 10

11 PHYS page 11

12 PHYS page 12

13 PHYS page 13

14 And Kittel - with the factor 2 result
PHYS page 14

15 ________________________________________________________________
And Kittel - with the factor 2 result ________________________________________________________________ PHYS page 15


Download ppt "Modified Copy of Lecture Note from"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google