Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Mollie Lange, Kuya Takami
Auto Suture Device for Nasal Surgery Team: Tim Pearce, Peter Ma, Mollie Lange, Kuya Takami BME 200/300 October 2006
2
Client: Dr. Ben Marcus Division of Otolaryngology Advisor: Prof. Kristyn S. Masters Department of Biomedical Engineering
3
Outline Problem Statement Background Motivation Design Requirements
Proposed Designs Design Matrix Future Work
4
Problem Statement Develop a device which will automatically deploy a suture to a specific region of the nose. Applicable to two of the most common nasal surgeries.
5
Background Rhinoplasty Septoplasty modify the shape and size of a nose
corrects any deformation of nasal septum
6
Background Suture Fine threads joining two surfaces
Introduced by the ancient Egyptians Stapler Caesarean sections and intestinal surgery Staples: different sizes and materials
7
Motivation A currently simple but tedious procedure
Save both time and money Increase quality of the suture
8
Requirements The accuracy and reliability of the device must be comparable to the current standard procedure Surgeon and client safety must be maintained Cost per device must not exceed $300
9
Autosuture Varying patterns Curved or linear needle
Mimic current methods used by surgeons
10
Pros and Cons Widely accepted by surgeons
Ensure the safety of the patient Different types of suturing material – non-absorbable or absorbable Very difficult to build Not adjustable to different sizes
11
Medical Glue Several different types
Absorption and drying time both vary Can be ordered in large quantities Gaining popularity among surgeons
12
Pros and Cons Success in medical studies Quick and easy to apply
Long shelf life Must be coupled with nasal packing (risk of TSS) Risky to patient
13
Surgical Stapler Similar in function to a paper stapler
Becoming commonplace in operations Non-absorbable & absorbable staples
14
Pros and Cons Sterile Safe Accurate Easy to modify Simpler mechanism
Does not replicate current technique
15
Criteria (item weight)
Design Matrix Criteria (item weight) Autosuture Design Medical Glue Surgical Stapler Sterilizable (3) 5x3 = 15 Patient/Surgeon Safety (3) 2x3 = 6 4x3 = 12 Accuracy (3) 3x3 = 9 Strength of Suture (2) 4x2 = 8 Adjustable device (2) 3x2 = 6 Patient Comfort (2) 5x2 = 10 Time needed (2) Cost (1) 3x1 = 3 5x1 = 5 4x1 = 4 Shelf Life (1) Attractiveness (1) Total (Max score = 100) 83 76 87
16
Future Work Modify existing device Some unchangeable features
Size constraints Testing Obtain additional samples
17
References United States Patent & Trademark Office US Surgical
Journal of the American Society of Medicine PubMed Online Toxic Shock Syndrome Information Service
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.