Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ecohydrological Approach to Ecosystem Restoration

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ecohydrological Approach to Ecosystem Restoration"— Presentation transcript:

1 Ecohydrological Approach to Ecosystem Restoration
Prof. Dr. Paul J. DuBowy Ecohydrology Associates, LLC Lovell, Wyoming USA

2

3

4

5 Basic → Applied

6

7 Outline Ecohydrology as the Ecosystem Driver Restoration Concepts
Measuring Success

8 What is Ecohydrology? Ecohydrology is a scientific concept applied to environmental problem-solving. Ecohydrology provides the tools to deal with aquatic ecosystems degradation. Ecohydrology is based on a holistic approach to aquatic ecosystems that integrates hydrology and biology for finding the most adequate solutions for the benefit of society and ecosystems.

9 Ecohydrology

10 Ecohydrology 2 Using ecosystem properties as a management tool enhances carrying capacity of ecosystems against human impact. This approach is supported by a profound knowledge of ecosystems functioning, as a basis for coupling the interplay between hydrologic and ecological factors, in order to increase ecosystems robustness and resilience to anthropogenic impacts.

11 Ecohydrology Fundamentals
Three Principles Hydrology and Hydraulics Fluvial Geomorphology Biogeochemistry Example Applications Flood Control, Navigation and Dredging Nutrients and Treatment Wetlands Ecosystem Management and Restoration

12 Hydrology and Hydraulics
vertical river stage/lake level lateral areal extent/inundation Hydraulics longitudinal flow/velocity

13 Hydraulics Manning’s Equation: v = kn/n R2/3 S1/2
v = cross-sectional average velocity (ft/s, m/s) kn = (English units) and kn = 1.0 (SI units) n = coefficient of roughness R = hydraulic radius (ft, m) = A/P A = cross sectional area of flow (ft2, m2) P = wetted perimeter (ft, m) S = slope (ft/ft, m/m)

14 Hydrology and Hydraulics
Why important? how water moves through an aquatic system influences the physical, chemical and biological properties of aquatic systems Abundance Duration Flow paths Flux Seasonal distribution

15 Hydrology is the Driver the rest is just details

16 Factors Affecting Hydrology
(change) Climate precipitation (rainfall/snowfall) evapotranspiration long-term hydroperiod (periodic wet-dry cycles) Geomorphology landform (floodplain, depression, etc.) slope (angle) Soil stratigraphy/permeability Regional connectivity (surface, subsurface) Vegetation/wildlife/humans

17 Inputs and Outputs Precipitation (net; Pn ) Evapotranspiration (ET)
Surface flow (Si, So ) Groundwater (Gi, Go) Tides/Seiche (T)

18 Overall Hydrologic Budget
V/t = Pn + Si + Gi – ET – So – Go  T PnV; SiV; GiV; TiV ETV; SoV; GoV; ToV Residence Time t = V/Q [t-1 = Q/V]

19

20 Model Hydrology Pn ET dV/dt Si So T Gi Go

21 Estuarine Hydrology Pn ET dV/dt Si So T Gi Go

22 Low Tide High Tide

23 Organic Flats Hydrology
Pn ET dV/dt Si So Gi Go

24 Quaking Bog (Alaska)

25 Everglades – “River of Grass”

26 Tropical Peatlands

27 Organic Flats Bogs, Everglades, Tropical Peatlands
Precipitation driven Flat topography→Slow outflow of surface water Organic matter accumulation (peat) Raised elevation of wetland Low pH (acidic) Nutrients bound to sediments→Nutrient-poor ecosystems Insectivorous plants

28 Lacustrine Hydrology Pn ET dV/dt Si So Gi Go

29 Closed Basin Systems

30 Lago Titicaca Pn 47% ET91% dV/dt Si 53% So 9% Go ? Gi <1%

31 Lake Levels Cross et al. 2001

32 Climate Change–Titicaca
Pn ET↑ dV/dt Si  So ↓ Go ? Gi <1%

33 Model Titicaca Level Decreases
in Cross et al. 2001

34

35 Riverine Hydrology Pn ET dV/dt Si So Gi Go

36

37

38 Climate Change 2012 2011

39 Fluvial Geomorphology Erosion/deposition (aggradation/degradation)
Long-term storage Sediment transfer Upland Upland valley Floodplain valley Large river Erosion Erosion/deposition (aggradation/degradation) Deposition from Church 2002

40 Hydraulic Processes It is in low-gradiant reaches where we observe dynamic processes such as island and sandbar development and side channel and chute creation due to the continual removal and settling of alluvial material. Islands, sandbars and paleochannels are not static – alluvium is continually reworked by hydraulic processes and moved downstream, leading to temporal patterns of channel morphology.

41 Balance of Dynamic Forces
Rosgen Rosgen (Sediment Load) × (Sediment Size) ∝ (Stream Slope) × (Stream Discharge)

42

43 Biogeochemistry Oxidation (aerobic)  Reduction (anoxic)
Organic N  NH3  NH (ammonification) NO3-  NO2-  NH (nitrification) NO3-  N2O  N2 (denitrification) Organic P  SOP  PO4-3  HPO4-2  H2PO4-  insoluble inorganic P (complexes with Ca, Fe, Al; adsorption on clay/organic particles) CO3-2  HCO3-  CO2  C(H2O)  CH4 (carbonate-bicarbonate system) (methanogenesis) SO4-2  S-2 ( H2S) (sulfate-sulfide system)

44 Excess Nutrients

45 Hydrology is the Driver

46 Treatment Wetlands

47 Fundamentals of Restoration
“Ecologists have learned much about ecosystem structure and function by dissecting communities and examining their parts and processes. The true test of our understanding of how ecosystems work, however, is our ability to recreate them.” J. J. Ewel, 1987

48 What is Restoration? Put it back to the way it was in the Good Old Days original “mint” condition Restoration Put it back as much as possible substitute/compromise where necessary Rehabilitation Correct the problem “custom” restoration Reclamation/Remediation SMALL SCALE LARGE

49 Restoration Factors Science Art Black Magic Luck

50 Original Ecosystem Ecosystem Function Degraded Ecosystem
Ecosystem Restoration Degraded Ecosystem Environmental Alteration Ecosystem Function Ecosystem Structure

51 Original Ecosystem Ecosystem Function Degraded Ecosystem
Miss River Conference Original Ecosystem Replacement (Reclamation/ Remediation) Rehabilitation Degraded Ecosystem Ecosystem Function Neglect (Stochastic Events) Neglect Ecosystem Structure Bradshaw, 1984

52 Original Ecosystem Non-linear Response Ecosystem Function Existing Conditions Ecosystem Structure

53 Function Function/Structure Structure (Biological Lag) Time

54 Dynamic Ecosystem Ecosystem Function Ecosystem Structure

55 Degradation Function/Structure Restoration Time

56 Restoration vs. Rehabilitation
Original Ecosystem Rehabilitation Degraded Ecosystem Ecosystem Function Ecosystem Structure

57

58

59

60 “I’m not trying to recreate the ancient ecosystem. That is gone
“I’m not trying to recreate the ancient ecosystem. That is gone. I’m trying to create biodiversity.” – D. Tallamy

61 Restoration vs. Replacement
Original Ecosystem Replacement (Reclamation/ Remediation) Degraded Ecosystem Ecosystem Function Ecosystem Structure

62

63

64

65 Rehabilitation vs. Replacement
Original Ecosystem Replacement Rehabilitation Degraded Ecosystem Ecosystem Function Ecosystem Structure

66 Rehabilitation vs. Replacement
Original Ecosystem Human Benefits Ecosystem Benefits Degraded Ecosystem Ecosystem Function Ecosystem Structure

67

68

69 Monticello Dam/Lake Berryessa

70 Glen Canyon Dam

71 l/s 85000 l/s

72 l/s l/s

73 Impacted River Systems
Bengawan Solo Nillson et al. 2005

74 Simulation Models

75 Replacement Rehabilitation Restoration

76 Environmental Sustainability
If you build it, they will come…

77

78 Restoration Objectives
Enhance Ecosystem Function and Structure environmental sustainability Establish Achievable Goals benchmark Desired Future Conditions (DFCs) to appropriate reference sites recognize that engineering design and socioeconomic concerns must also be addressed

79 Ecosystem Factors Environmental Design Recognition Understanding
drivers, stressors, and attributes Understanding Integration Environmental Design

80

81 Getting the Water Right
Quantity Quality Timing Distribution

82 Hydrological Restoration
Plugging ditches Locating and removing subsurface tile lines Channel reestablishment Levee/dike removal/construction Water control structures

83

84

85

86

87 Restoration Analysis Most complex aspect of restoration program and phase with longest duration. While hydrological restoration can be accomplished in a short time frame (few months or years), restoration of the biological components of an ecosystem is a relatively slow process. Trends can and should be analyzed in an ongoing effort that will also be critical to success of adaptive management phase of project.

88 Long-term Process

89 Assessment Objectives
Determine if restored wetland ecosystem (river channel and floodplain, estuarine system, etc.) meets hydrological criteria outlined in design report and plan evaluation. Determine if carefully selected biological and ecological attributes have been restored (project evaluation). Modify system management to improve the restoration process based on analysis completed under #1 and 2. This process is called Adaptive Management.

90 Why Long-term Monitoring?
Function Function/Structure Structure Authorized Monitoring Time

91 Conclusions Hydrology is the principal ecosystem driver in all aquatic systems. Not all aquatic systems have the same hydrology–Know your hydrology! It is imperative to recognize the hydrological characteristics of the aquatic ecosystem under study and to use the appropriate tools (computer programs, on-ground structures, etc.) to facilitate management or restoration of the system.

92 Paul J. DuBowy, Ph.D. Ecohydrology Associates, LLC P.O. Box 816 Lovell, Wyoming USA

93


Download ppt "Ecohydrological Approach to Ecosystem Restoration"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google