Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

OSHE 421 Measurement of Safety Performance and Accident Investigation/Analysis Spring Semester, 2016 Instructor: Mr. Chris Kuiper, CSP Email: august.kuiper@selu.edu.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "OSHE 421 Measurement of Safety Performance and Accident Investigation/Analysis Spring Semester, 2016 Instructor: Mr. Chris Kuiper, CSP Email: august.kuiper@selu.edu."— Presentation transcript:

1 OSHE 421 Measurement of Safety Performance and Accident Investigation/Analysis Spring Semester, 2016
Instructor: Mr. Chris Kuiper, CSP

2 Incident Investigation Techniques
Investigation aimed at prevention, not fault finding Various analytical techniques available, e.g., 5 Why MORT TOR Tap Root Root Cause Analysis Hartford Process Fish Bone or Ishikawa Diagram TOP-SET

3 Which Technique to Use? Easy to use in the field by non-experts
Consistently good root cause identification Well documented Supported by effective user training Credible with the workforce – no finger pointing Helpful presenting results to management Designed to allow collection, comparison and measurement of root cause trends

4 Definitions Investigation – detailed, systematic study to discover who, what, where, when, why and how Analysis – method to arrange facts Inference – probable facts based on actual facts

5 Definitions Judgment – formal opinion – just remember, everything you say can and will be used … Recommendation – corrective actions believed applicable to correct the root cause(s) CSR’s – Codes, Standards and Regulations Error – deviation from a required or expected standard of performance

6 Sequence of Events Domino theory Multiple causation theory
Ancestry/social environment Fault or person Unsafe act Unsafe condition Injury Multiple causation theory Things have to come together at the right time and place to result in an incident

7 The Five M’s

8 Inferential Conclusions
Consider information that may not be fully documented and “infer” conclusions Positive and negative evidence and conclusions Conclusion reached through reasoning Inductive process Everyone at the location wears safety glasses; so the injured person was wearing safety glasses

9 Hartford Procedure Equipment Material People Select Select Select
Arrange Place Place Use Handle Train Maintain Process Lead Ask why, what, where, when, who and how of each item under the headings Develop corrective actions

10 5 Why Technique Used to screen level of detail investigation requires
Five is general guideline to reach the root cause level Key is to find and fix recurring problems by addressing true causes - not symptoms 

11 Categories Select Categories to Study: People Policies Procedures
Processes Machinery Materials Environment (facilities, weather, noise, lighting, etc.) Technology

12 5 Why Start asking questions about the incident following each category Ask “why” as many times as required to get to the root cause as agreed by the investigation team

13 Management Oversight and Risk Tree (MORT)
Uses diagrams and charts Premise - damage to property or injury to persons must have a hazard, a target, and some barrier that usually separates the hazard and the target Results of technical incident analysis using MORT analysis identified average of 38 factors per mishap

14 Management Oversight and Risk Tree (MORT)
Mishap – unwanted transfer of energy that produces injury, damage, process degradation and unwanted losses Based on the concept losses arise from: Job oversights and omissions Management system factors Assumed risk – properly evaluated – is not accidental

15 MORT Diagrams Logic tree starting with the mishap Uses and/or “gates”
Less than adequate – LTA Intense process – best used as analytical tool with facts from the incident site

16 MORT Diagrams Experienced analyst can complete less serious cases in minutes Highly complicated processes at least 4 hours “Mini-MORT” Deductive or inductive process?

17 Fishbone–Cause and Effect Diagram
First list the problem/issue in the “head” of the fish Label each fish bone with major categories Repeat procedure with each factor to produce sub-factors Ask “Why is this happening” and put additional segments under each sub-factor

18 Taproot If the investigator becomes a witness at trial – work product privilege waived and the investigator may be deposed and subpoenaed Expert witness can pay well but must be qualified by education, experience or both Credible in presentation Correct is answers Clear in content Concise – answer the question, don’t pontificate Candid – natural, sincere and honest

19

20 Agency Reporting Consumer Product Safety Act Medical Devices Act
Fails to comply with applicable product safety rule Defect creates substantial product hazard to public Immediately notify CPSC Medical Devices Act Failure of medical device requires investigation and written record submitted

21 Agency Reporting Occupational Safety and Health Act
Recordkeeping and reporting as discussed in Lecture 1 slides


Download ppt "OSHE 421 Measurement of Safety Performance and Accident Investigation/Analysis Spring Semester, 2016 Instructor: Mr. Chris Kuiper, CSP Email: august.kuiper@selu.edu."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google