Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMerryl Charleen Fox Modified over 7 years ago
1
The Legal System: Legal Foundations, the Constitution and Statute Law
2
What will we cover in this course?
Some clues? What do you think will be interesting?
3
What are we doing today? Orientation What are laws? Where do Australia’s laws come from? What is compliance?
4
What are the Major Sources of Law?
Statute Law: Legislation enacted (passed by) federal and state parliaments Common Law: Principles and rules based on decisions of judges. May also refer to equity law Statutes take priority over common law: double jeopardy example!
5
Common Law vs Statute Law
6
Criminal vs Civil Law Criminal Law: State (‘the Crown’) must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally committed a wrong that is prohibited by statute Main aims are punishment and deterrence Civil Law: Plaintiff must prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendant has breached (broken) a legal agreement. Two major categories are contract law and torts Main aim is compensation (damages)
7
Origins and Development of Law
Common Law After Norman Conquest, judges travelled the country Gradually made common (uniform) rulings that followed previous decisions
8
Origins and Development of Law
Equity Developed in response to rigid common law rules Based on fairness and justice Two main equitable remedies are Injunction: An order to stop a certain act Specific Performance: An order to carry out a legal obligation (eg land or unique goods) Common law and equity are now merged
9
Was Australia Settled Legally?
The British failed to make treaties with indigenous population as required by international law The British overcame objections by arguing terra nullius. Australia was empty land - not controlled or cultivated – and therefore the British ‘discovered’ it
10
Was Australia Settled Legally?
11
Let’s think about whether this makes sense
2 video clips Who was Mabo? How was Mabo interpreted? -
12
Landmark Developments in Native Title
Mabo Case (1992): Declared Australia not terra nullius. Native title had been retained over land that had been continuously occupied Native Title Act (1993): Affirmed Mabo decision. Created Native Title Tribunal to determine claims Wik Case (1996): Native Title rights and pastoral leases could co-exist Fejo Case (1998): Freehold title permanently extinguishes native title Croker Island Case (1998): Native Title extends to offshore waters
13
The Native Title Amendment Act
Native title does not exist if prior to 1 January 1994 it was subject to “exclusive possession” Since 2002 it is clear that some rights such as hunting rights may not be extinguished Rights of pastoral and mining leaseholds A strict threshold test
14
Levels of Government Federal State Local House of Representatives
Senate Governor General State Lower House Upper House (not in Queensland) Governor Local Councils Derives authority from State Government
16
Separation of Powers Government separated into three ‘independent’ functions: Legislative (law making): Parliament Executive (governing): Prime Minister and executive ministers (the cabinet) Judicial (judging and interpreting): Courts
17
Federalism Strengths Weaknesses Reduce Corruption Duplication
Increases political choice Neglect of public policy eg Murray River Cost of 15 houses of parliament
18
Division of Powers Exclusive Constitutional Powers
Commonwealth has some exclusive powers to pass legislation e.g in relation to military, currency & customs Under section 51 it has power to legislate in 39 areas, including trade & commerce, communications, banking, insurance, bankruptcy & intellectual property The Commonwealth has effectively gained exclusive power over most s 51 areas. See figure strategies used to extend federal powers
19
Division of Powers Concurrent Constitutional Powers: Shared by Commonwealth and States e.g. taxation Residual Powers: Remaining powers are controlled only by states. e.g. local government
20
Division of Powers
21
What if State and Federal Law Conflict?
Section 109 If any section of a state Act is inconsistent (clashes) with any section of a federal act, the federal section must be followed See Wallis v Downard-Pickford Pty Ltd (p 14) The remaining sections of the state Act remains in force
22
Bill of Rights The ACT and Victoria have passed Acts that guarantee key human rights There are no penalties for breaches
23
How can the Constitution be Changed?
Parliament agrees to hold a referendum (vote) The change must be agreed to by: A majority (more than 50%) of Australian voters and A majority of voters in at least 4/6 states Only one major change since inclusion of Aborigines in census (1967)
24
Why do we pass new legislation
Tidy common law up Address new situations eg The Electronic Transaction Act
25
How is Legislation Passed?
A Bill is ‘read’ (debated) and voted three times by each house of parliament (One house in Qld) Royal assent given by: Governor General (Federal), or Governor (State) Published in Government Gazette
27
Main Features of an Act The important features of an Act include:
Headings Sections Definitions ‘Objects’ (aims) Regulations
29
Self Quiz: True or False
Laws made by governments are often called common law The main remedy available through equity is damages The Mabo case recognised native title over land that has been continuously occupied from before white settlement to present day and has not been legally alienated. The executive administers the country, the legislature interprets and enforces the law and the judiciary enforces statutes The power to pass taxation law is a concurrent power The constitution can only be changed by a referendum which has been approved by more than 70% of Australian voters.
30
How to Interpret an Act? If words are vague or ambiguous judges & magistrates can choose one of the following: Literal Rule: Ordinary dictionary meaning applied even if result unfair - see The Flick Knife Case (p. 23) Golden Rule: Ordinary meaning altered to achieve a consistent interpretation – see The ‘Stop’ Case (p. 23) Mischief Rule: Assumes meaning consistent with problem statute intended to prevent
31
The Purpose Rule If meaning of a section is unclear most courts required under the Acts Interpretation Act to choose the purpose meant by Parliament Court has right to consider extrinsic (outside) materials, e.g., parliamentary debates - see the Stock Route Case (p. 24)
32
Other Aids to interpretation
The courts may also rely on two maxims (guides) Ejusdem generis (if a general rule follows a specific rule it is limited and Noscitur a sociis (interpretation of unclear words are interpreted in the context of those words) If the unclear section includes general words and specific words, the general words should be consistent with the specifics
33
The Purpose Rule
34
Class Exercise Imagine s 22 TAFE Education Act 2002 makes it an offence to bring any concealed notes, sketches, books or aids relevant to the exam into the room. The Education Minister said in parliamentary debate that s 22 was intended to give exam monitors stronger powers to prevent cheating. Explain how the common law rules of statutory interpretation would apply to the following: 1. Toby is caught in the exam room receiving intructions from headphones attached to his iphone. 2. Debbie accidentally leaves notes in her pocket. 30 minutes later she realises what she has done and hands the notes over. 3. Ian writes down notes and leaves them on a table where another student reads them.
35
Delegated Legislation
Parliament delegates (gives) public servants the power to make regulations, ordinances and by-laws Advantages: Frees up Parliament, legislation drafted by experts Disadvantages: Undemocratic. Controlled by bureaucrats
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.