Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Installation of the waveguides between MB T0#2 and DB T0#2

Published by恶壤 江 Modified over 7 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Installation of the waveguides between MB T0#2 and DB T0#2"— Presentation transcript:

1 Installation of the waveguides between MB T0#2 and DB T0#2
CLIC meeting Anna Zemanek

2 List of contents: 1. Impact of the installation of the waveguides 2
List of contents: 1. Impact of the installation of the waveguides 2. Impact of the installation of missing elements + impact of water 3. Impact of the vacuum (structures) CLIC meeting Anna Zemanek

3 1. Impact of the installation of the waveguides

4 1. Measurements before the installation of the waveguides
2 stations CMM data of the girders, PETS, DBQ, AS Temperature 20 °C ± 0.5°C Fiducials on the girder, PETS, DBQ, AS and network Coordinate frames of the girders: Primary axis – longitudinal – Y – between –IN and –OUT Secondary axis – vertical – Z – between –MIDDLE and –HIGH Origin –MIDDLE point - Using Least Square Method (LSM) 2 stations were calculated together with 4 DOF (3 translations, 1rotation Rz, Rx and Ry - fixed)

5 2. Measurements after the installation of the waveguides
3 stations CMM data of the girders, PETS, DBQ, AS Temperature 20 °C ± 0.5°C Fiducials on the girder, PETS, DBQ, AS and network Coordinate frames of the girders: Primary axis – longitudinal – Y – between –IN and –OUT Secondary axis – vertical – Z – between –MIDDLE and –HIGH Origin –MIDDLE point - Using Least Square Method (LSM) 3 stations were calculated together with 4 DOF (3 translations, 1rotation Rz, Rx and Ry - fixed)

6 Calculations of measurements
3. Best-fit: CMM data (girders) into LSM coordinates 4. Best fit: CMM data of AS, PETS, Quads into LSM X Z Y CMM LSM component

7 after installation of waveguides after installation of waveguides
Results Comparison between measured points on the AS (using MB frame) AS1 AS2 AS3 AS4 AS5 AS6 AS7 AS8 -IN -OUT -HIGH before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 9AS1 0.770 9AS2 1.134 1.196 0.061 0.001 -0.006 9AS3 2.289 9AS4 33.543 73.554 9AS5 33.314 73.171 9AS6 72.171 32.680 72.189 32.658 0.018 -0.008 -0.022 9AS7 1.736 1.673 -0.007 -0.001 -0.063 9AS8 1.523 1.431 0.036 -0.026 -0.092 Y X Z Comparison between fitted points on the AS (using MB frame) before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 9AS_high 0.840 0.920 0.081 -0.009 -0.002 9AS_in 0.284 -0.026 0.279 -0.031 -0.005 -0.006 9AS_middle 0.128 -0.032 0.125 -0.033 -0.003 -0.001 9AS_out -0.027 -0.038 -0.028 -0.036 0.000 0.002

8 after installation of waveguides after installation of waveguides
Results Comparison between measured points on the AS (using MB frame) AS1 AS2 AS3 AS4 AS5 AS6 AS7 AS8 -IN -OUT -HIGH before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 10AS1 2.317 1.632 -0.685 -0.016 0.002 10AS2 2.786 2.112 -0.674 -0.011 -0.014 10AS3 0.197 10AS4 33.636 75.482 33.257 75.653 -0.378 -0.007 0.171 10AS5 33.671 75.710 33.296 75.879 -0.376 -0.005 0.169 10AS7 -5.404 -4.731 0.008 -0.015 0.673 10AS8 -3.544 -2.874 0.016 -0.012 0.670 Y X Z Comparison between fitted points on the AS (using MB frame) before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 10AS_high 1.783 0.784 -0.999 -0.008 -0.003 10AS_in -0.006 -0.026 -0.015 -0.031 -0.009 -0.012 -0.005 10AS_middle 0.012 -0.029 0.010 -0.038 -0.002 10AS_out 0.030 -5.103 0.035 -5.115 -0.045 0.005 -0.014

9 after installation of waveguides after installation of waveguides
Results Comparison between measured points on the AS (using MB frame) AS1 AS2 AS3 AS4 AS5 AS6 AS7 AS8 -IN -OUT -HIGH before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 11AS1 0.926 27.215 11AS2 0.052 0.186 0.134 -0.002 0.007 11AS3 -0.616 -0.501 0.116 0.000 0.004 11AS4 33.604 81.894 33.688 81.862 0.084 -0.010 -0.032 11AS5 33.717 80.852 33.807 80.817 0.090 0.003 -0.035 11AS6 70.014 32.375 11AS7 2.887 2.760 0.010 -0.015 -0.127 11AS8 3.755 3.625 0.017 -0.130 Y X Z Comparison between fitted points on the AS (using MB frame) before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 11AS_high 1.016 1.212 0.196 -0.004 -0.002 11AS_in 11.115 -0.035 0.000 11.110 -0.033 0.004 -0.005 0.002 11AS_middle -0.007 -0.032 0.003 0.010 -0.006 -0.001 11AS_out -0.010 -0.030 0.005 0.015 -0.003

10 after installation of waveguides after installation of waveguides
Results Comparison between measured points on the AS (using MB frame) AS1 AS2 AS3 AS4 AS5 AS6 AS7 AS8 -IN -OUT -HIGH before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 12AS1 -1.456 12AS2 -1.063 -1.204 -0.141 -0.010 0.007 12AS3 1.583 1.445 -0.138 -0.020 0.005 12AS4 34.047 68.484 12AS6 71.400 32.291 71.389 32.307 -0.012 -0.014 0.015 12AS7 0.211 0.355 0.003 -0.017 0.144 12AS8 0.087 0.237 0.009 -0.011 0.150 Y X Z Comparison between fitted points on the AS (using MB frame) before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 12AS_high 3.238 3.029 -0.209 -0.015 0.005 12AS_in -0.236 -0.045 -0.238 -0.047 -0.001 -0.011 -0.002 12AS_middle 0.661 0.014 0.665 0.016 0.004 -0.012 0.003 12AS_out 1.559 0.072 1.568 0.080 0.009 0.008

11 after installation of waveguides after installation of waveguides
Results Comparison between measured points on the PETS (using DB frame) -HIGH PETS1 PETS2 PETS3 PETS6 PETS4 PETS5 -IN -OUT before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 3PETS1 0.029 0.008 -0.002 3PETS2 0.014 0.003 3PETS3 20.618 20.631 0.026 -0.017 0.013 3PETS4 0.022 0.009 0.001 3PETS5 0.012 0.004 -0.001 3PETS6 14.866 14.868 0.002 Y X Z Comparison between fitted points on the PETS (using DB frame) before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 3PETS-high 0.425 0.451 0.026 0.009 -0.007 3PETS-in -0.032 -0.020 -0.033 -0.026 0.000 0.008 -0.006 3PETS-middle -0.012 -0.010 -0.017 3PETS-out -0.009

12 after installation of waveguides after installation of waveguides
Results Comparison between measured points on the PETS (using DB frame) -HIGH PETS4 PETS5 PETS6 PETS3 PETS1 PETS2 -IN -OUT before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 4PETS1 0.010 0.001 0.008 4PETS2 0.006 0.005 0.002 4PETS3 22.311 22.321 0.004 4PETS4 -0.002 -0.005 4PETS5 0.015 -0.003 4PETS6 25.896 25.909 0.013 Y X Z Comparison between fitted points on the PETS (using DB frame) before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 4PETS-high 6.620 6.635 0.015 0.000 -0.001 4PETS-in 0.079 0.017 0.085 0.013 0.006 0.003 -0.004 4PETS-middle 0.081 0.031 4PETS-out 0.084 0.046 0.049

13 after installation of waveguides after installation of waveguides
Results Comparison between measured points on the DBQ (using DB frame) -HIGH DBQ1 -OUT DBQ2 DBQ3 DBQ5 DBQ6 DBQ8 -IN before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 3DBQ1 49.799 49.809 0.010 -0.007 0.000 3DBQ2 0.009 -0.004 -0.008 3DBQ3 -0.010 -0.001 3DBQ5 50.264 50.265 0.005 0.001 3DBQ6 0.004 3DBQ8 Y X Z Comparison between fitted points on the DBQ (using DB frame) before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 3DBPM-in 0.036 0.005 0.043 0.002 0.008 -0.007 -0.004 3DBPM-out 0.024 0.029 -0.001 -0.003 3DBQ-high -0.062 -0.053 0.009 3DBQ-middle 0.004 0.035 0.000 0.006

14 after installation of waveguides after installation of waveguides
Results Comparison between measured points on the DBQ (using DB frame) -HIGH DBQ1 -OUT DBQ2 DBQ3 DBQ5 DBQ6 DBQ8 -IN before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 4DBQ1 50.102 50.105 0.003 -0.006 -0.002 4DBQ2 0.000 -0.003 0.004 4DBQ3 -0.001 0.002 4DBQ5 49.049 49.045 -0.004 4DBQ6 4DBQ8 -0.007 Y X Z Comparison between fitted points on the DBQ (using DB frame) before waveguides after installation of waveguides difference Number X [mm] Y [mm] Z [mm] dX [mm] dY [mm] dZ [mm] 4DBPM-in 0.032 -0.022 0.028 -0.021 -0.003 -0.005 0.001 4DBPM-out 0.040 0.022 0.043 0.021 0.003 -0.001 4DBQ-high 0.148 0.000 -0.004 4DBQ-middle 0.036 0.037 0.002

15 Comparison between ‘before’ and ‘after’ installation of the waveguides
Results Comparison between ‘before’ and ‘after’ installation of the waveguides Y X Z 9AS 10AS 11AS 12AS value Tx -0.003 mm Ty -0.006 Tz -0.001 Rx 16 µrad Ry 417 Rz -11 value Tx -0.002 mm Ty -0.012 Tz -0.009 Rx -17 µrad Ry -4985 Rz -29 value Tx 0.008 mm Ty -0.006 Tz -0.001 Rx -4 µrad Ry 907 Rz 9 value Tx 0.004 mm Ty -0.012 Tz 0.003 Rx 20 µrad Ry -1066 Rz -21 Y X Z Y X Z 3PETS 4PETS 3DBQ 4DBQ value Tx -0.016 mm Ty -0.004 Tz -0.001 Rx 23 µrad Ry -63 Rz -38 value Tx -0.003 mm Ty Tz 0.001 Rx -12 µrad Ry -59 Rz -11 value Tx -0.006 mm Ty 0.007 Tz 0.004 Rx -3 µrad Ry -16 Rz -8 value Tx 0.000 mm Ty 0.005 Tz Rx 7 µrad Ry 3 Rz 22

16 Results Comparison between ‘before’ and ‘after’ installation of the waveguides Y X Z 9AS 10AS 11AS 12AS value Tx -0.003 mm Ty -0.006 Tz -0.001 Rx 16 µrad Ry 417 Rz -11 value Tx -0.002 mm Ty -0.012 Tz -0.009 Rx -17 µrad Ry -4985 Rz -29 value Tx 0.008 mm Ty -0.006 Tz -0.001 Rx -4 µrad Ry 907 Rz 9 value Tx 0.004 mm Ty -0.012 Tz 0.003 Rx 20 µrad Ry -1066 Rz -21 Precision for translation ̴± 10 µm, for roll ̴± 60 µrad Y X Z Y X Z 3PETS 4PETS 3DBQ 4DBQ value Tx -0.016 mm Ty -0.004 Tz -0.001 Rx 23 µrad Ry -63 Rz -38 value Tx -0.003 mm Ty Tz 0.001 Rx -12 µrad Ry -59 Rz -11 value Tx -0.006 mm Ty 0.007 Tz 0.004 Rx -3 µrad Ry -16 Rz -8 value Tx 0.000 mm Ty 0.005 Tz Rx 7 µrad Ry 3 Rz 22

17 2. Impact of the installation of missing elements + impact of water

18 Measurements after installation of the missing elements
2 stations CMM data of the girders, PETS, DBQ, AS Temperature 20 °C ± 0.5°C Fiducials on the girder, PETS, DBQ, AS and network Coordinate frames of the girders: Primary axis – longitudinal – Y – between –IN and –OUT Secondary axis – vertical – Z – between –MIDDLE and –HIGH Origin –MIDDLE point - Using Least Square Method (LSM) 2 stations were calculated together with 4 DOF (3 translations, 1rotation Rz, Rx and Ry - fixed)

19 Results Impact of the missing elements (and water) on the alignment of the components Y X Z 9AS 10AS 11AS 12AS value Tx -0.008 mm Ty -0.014 Tz 0.006 Rx -31 µrad Ry -43 Rz 41 value Tx -0.005 mm Ty -0.025 Tz 0.000 Rx 11 µrad Ry -2259 Rz 21 value Tx -0.012 mm Ty -0.013 Tz -0.008 Rx 23 µrad Ry 185 Rz -22 value Tx -0.057 mm Ty 0.265 Tz 0.126 Rx -1649 µrad Ry -1944 Rz -256 Y X Z Y X Z 3PETS 4PETS 3DBQ 4DBQ value Tx 0.025 mm Ty 0.008 Tz -0.005 Rx -31 µrad Ry 31 Rz 39 value Tx 0.006 mm Ty 0.012 Tz -0.017 Rx -6 µrad Ry 104 Rz -8 value Tx 0.002 mm Ty 0.000 Tz -0.002 Rx -9 µrad Ry 23 Rz -13 value Tx -0.004 mm Ty -0.009 Tz -0.005 Rx 5 µrad Ry 7 Rz -27

20 Precision for translation ̴± 10 µm, for roll ̴± 60 µrad
Results Impact of the missing elements (and water) on the alignment of the components Y X Z 9AS 10AS 11AS 12AS value Tx -0.008 mm Ty -0.014 Tz 0.006 Rx -31 µrad Ry -43 Rz 41 value Tx -0.005 mm Ty -0.025 Tz 0.000 Rx 11 µrad Ry -2259 Rz 21 value Tx -0.012 mm Ty -0.013 Tz -0.008 Rx 23 µrad Ry 185 Rz -22 value Tx -0.057 mm Ty 0.265 Tz 0.126 Rx -1649 µrad Ry -1944 Rz -256 Precision for translation ̴± 10 µm, for roll ̴± 60 µrad Y X Z Y X Z 4PETS 3DBQ 3PETS 4DBQ value Tx 0.025 mm Ty 0.008 Tz -0.005 Rx -31 µrad Ry 31 Rz 39 value Tx 0.006 mm Ty 0.012 Tz -0.017 Rx -6 µrad Ry 104 Rz -8 value Tx 0.002 mm Ty 0.000 Tz -0.002 Rx -9 µrad Ry 23 Rz -13 value Tx -0.004 mm Ty -0.009 Tz -0.005 Rx 5 µrad Ry 7 Rz -27

21 3. Impact of the vacuum (structures)

22 Measurements structures under the vacuum
1 station CMM data of the girder, AS Temperature 20 °C ± 0.5°C Fiducials on the girder, AS Coordinate frames of the girders: Primary axis – longitudinal – Y – between –IN and –OUT Secondary axis – vertical – Z – between –MIDDLE and –HIGH Origin –MIDDLE point

23 Results Impact of the vacuum on the structures 10AS 9AS
Y X Z 10AS 9AS value Tx 0.000 mm Ty 0.019 Tz -0.002 Rx µrad Ry -118 Rz -42 value Tx -0.003 mm Ty 0.003 Tz 0.005 Rx 9 µrad Ry 71 Rz 12 Why on this structure so big differences? 11AS 12AS value Tx 0.006 mm Ty 0.001 Tz 0.003 Rx 32 µrad Ry 68 Rz -7 value Tx -0.023 mm Ty -0.120 Tz -0.080 Rx 812 µrad Ry 587 Rz -205

24 Thank you for attention
Conclusion Installation of the waveguides: big impact in roll of the AS structures PETS and DBQ - OK 2. Installation of the missing elements (and water): impact on 3 AS structures and 2 PETS 3. Impact of the vacuum: in the structure 9AS a small impact In the structure 12AS a huge impact caused by … ? In two others 10AS and 11AS – no impact Thank you for attention

Download ppt "Installation of the waveguides between MB T0#2 and DB T0#2"

Similar presentations

Abstract Mechanical Inspection and Survey Steven Seiler, NSLS-II Project The Survey and Alignment Group is often the first and last to work with the Storage.

Abstract Mechanical Inspection and Survey Steven Seiler, NSLS-II Project The Survey and Alignment Group is often the first and last to work with the Storage.
Figure 1 ； Video File. Figure 2 : Anatomical orthogonal coordinate system Z Y +RY ： Left Axial Rotation -RY: Right Axial Rotation +RZ ： Right Lateral.

Figure 1 ； Video File. Figure 2 : Anatomical orthogonal coordinate system Z Y +RY ： Left Axial Rotation -RY: Right Axial Rotation +RZ ： Right Lateral.
2012.03.21, CLIC Test Module Meeting Status of the DB Quad adjustable support design Mateusz Sosin CLIC Module WG Meeting, 22-May-2013.

, CLIC Test Module Meeting Status of the DB Quad adjustable support design Mateusz Sosin CLIC Module WG Meeting, 22-May-2013.
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.

Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
DFG-Research Unit “Earth rotation and Global Dynamic processes” Poznan, 13 – 17 October 2008 N. Panafidina, M. Rothacher, D. Thaller Comparison and Combination.

DFG-Research Unit “Earth rotation and Global Dynamic processes” Poznan, 13 – 17 October 2008 N. Panafidina, M. Rothacher, D. Thaller Comparison and Combination.
Elementary 3D Transformations - a Graphics Engine Transformation procedures Transformations of coordinate systems Translation Scaling Rotation.

Elementary 3D Transformations - a "Graphics Engine" Transformation procedures Transformations of coordinate systems Translation Scaling Rotation.
Robert Ruland Intra Girder Assembly and Alignment - October 20, 2005 Internal LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review 1 Intra.

Robert Ruland Intra Girder Assembly and Alignment - October 20, 2005 Internal LCLS Undulator Alignment and Motion Review 1 Intra.
Pre-alignment solutions applied to girders 1/19 Sylvain GRIFFET, 06/07/2010.

Pre-alignment solutions applied to girders 1/19 Sylvain GRIFFET, 06/07/2010.
Influence of the Gravity, Vacuum and RF on CLIC Module T0 Behavior 21.11.2011 R. Raatikainen.

Influence of the Gravity, Vacuum and RF on CLIC Module T0 Behavior R. Raatikainen.
1/9 Hélène Mainaud Durand Sylvain GRIFFET, 28/11/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Adjustment of 4 Drive Beam Quads positions on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No 1171946.

1/9 Hélène Mainaud Durand Sylvain GRIFFET, 28/11/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Adjustment of 4 Drive Beam Quads positions on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Installation of FD in September A.Jeremie, B.Bolzon, N.Geffroy, G.Gaillard, J.P.Baud, F.Peltier With the help of KEK, SLAC, KNU and CERN colleagues For.

Installation of FD in September A.Jeremie, B.Bolzon, N.Geffroy, G.Gaillard, J.P.Baud, F.Peltier With the help of KEK, SLAC, KNU and CERN colleagues For.
AIDA Infrastructure for very forward calorimeters Design proposal Mechanical support structure Designers:In collaboration with: Eric DavidFrancois-Xavier.

AIDA Infrastructure for very forward calorimeters Design proposal Mechanical support structure Designers:In collaboration with: Eric DavidFrancois-Xavier.
2012.03.21, CLIC Test Module Meeting Concept of ‘hexapod type’ DB Quad adjustable support Mateusz Sosin.

, CLIC Test Module Meeting Concept of ‘hexapod type’ DB Quad adjustable support Mateusz Sosin.
Measurement report of Boostec girders 1/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Measurements performed on the 28th of October 2010 with the Laser Tracker LTD500.

Measurement report of Boostec girders 1/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Measurements performed on the 28th of October 2010 with the Laser Tracker LTD500.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC ACTIVE PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDIES: STATUS FOR CDR AND PROSPECTS FOR TDR PHASE.

H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC ACTIVE PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDIES: STATUS FOR CDR AND PROSPECTS FOR TDR PHASE.
CLIC alignment studies OUTLINE CLEX Alignment of the components Impact of beam on sensors readings Long term stability of the supports (girders, DB quad)

CLIC alignment studies OUTLINE CLEX Alignment of the components Impact of beam on sensors readings Long term stability of the supports (girders, DB quad)
Muon alignment with Cosmics: Real and Monte Carlo data S.Vecchi, S.Pozzi INFN Ferrara 37th Software Week CERN 15-19 June 2009.

Muon alignment with Cosmics: Real and Monte Carlo data S.Vecchi, S.Pozzi INFN Ferrara 37th Software Week CERN June 2009.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.

H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
1/12 Sylvain GRIFFET, 17/10/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Simulations of laser tracker AT401 measurements on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No 1157095.

1/12 Sylvain GRIFFET, 17/10/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Simulations of laser tracker AT401 measurements on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
06-November-2013 Thermo-Mechanical Tests BE-RF-PM Review of the CLIC Two-Beam Module Program Thermo-Mechanical Tests L. Kortelainen, I. Kossyvakis, R.

06-November-2013 Thermo-Mechanical Tests BE-RF-PM Review of the CLIC Two-Beam Module Program Thermo-Mechanical Tests L. Kortelainen, I. Kossyvakis, R.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google