1. Teterboro Airport Part 150 Noise/Land Use Compatibility Study
Teterboro Users Group Meeting
July 19, 2017
Teterboro Airport

2. Agenda Introductions Part 150 Overview Noise Exposure Map (NEM)
Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) Discussion
Study Schedule

3. Generalized Part 150 Study Process / Schedule

4. Final TEB Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs)

5. Final NEM Dwelling Unit and Population Counts
Year
Metric
Dwelling Units within DNL Contour Interval
Population within DNL Contour Interval
65-70
70-75
Total
2016
Single Family 88
213
Multi-Family 51
123
Mobile Home 44 8 52
106 19
125
183
191
442
461
2021 83 5
201 12 49 2
119
124
Mobile Home1 48 9 57
116 22
138
180 16
196
436 39
475
Note: Population = 2.42 people times number of residential units

6. Noise Compatibility Program Development Process
Step 1: Identify Incompatible Land Uses
Existing conditions Noise Exposure Map
Forecast conditions Noise Exposure Map
Step 2: Consider Noise Abatement Strategies
Reduce exposure over incompatible uses
Limit growth in exposure over incompatible uses
Step 3: Consider Land Use Strategies
Mitigate residual incompatible uses
Prevent introduction of new incompatible uses
Step 4: Consider Programmatic Strategies
Implement and promote measures
Monitor and report on effectiveness
Update NEMs and revise NCP as appropriate
Analysis and Selection Process Applied in Steps 2 - 4
Evaluate effectiveness of each measure in addressing objectives
Evaluate feasibility (operational, safety, economic, etc.)
Select preferred “package” of measures
Identify implementation schedule, responsibilities, budget, funding sources, etc.
If not recommended, document reasons

7. Major NCP Strategy Options within Each Category
Noise Abatement Strategiess
Noise abatement flight tracks
Preferential runway use
Arrival/departure procedures
Airport layout modifications
Noise barriers (presented today)
Runup enclosures
Use restrictions (will be addressed at TAC 13)
Other actions proposed by stakeholders
Land Use Strategiesfff
Mitigation
Land acquisition
Sound insulation
Avigation easements
Prevention
Land use controls
Zoning
Building codes
Comprehensive plans
Real estate disclosures
Other actions proposed by stakeholders
Programmatic Strategies
Implementation tools (rules, regulations, ordinances, etc.)
Promotion, education, signage, etc.
Monitoring
Reporting
NEM updating
NCP revision
Other actions proposed by stakeholders

8. “Partial” DNL Contributors by Operational Category
Most Effective Noise Abatement Alternatives
Departure Operations
Day Departure Operations
Night Departure Operations
Jet Operations
To determine where we could have the biggest impact in procedural changes, the 2021 Future Condition NEM contours were analyzed by operational categories for DNL contribution. For the full analysis, see the TEB TAC #9 presentation here:
To obtain a significant change in the DNL 65 contour, a noise abatement procedure:
Must affect jet departures
Will be most effective in night jet departures as it will provide the greatest benefit relative to the number of operations affected
Results:
Jet operations dominate total DNL
Departures contribute more to total DNL than arrivals
Daytime operations contribute slightly more than nighttime

9. NCP Operational Noise Abatement Proposals
Category
Measure
Noise Benefit
Preferential runway use
Shift Runway 6 night arrivals to Runway 1 – Existing Program
Small benefit (reduction of 8 homes with a 25% shift)
Shift Runway 24 night departures to Runway 19 – Existing Program
Small benefit for a small increase (10%), no benefit at a higher increase (25%)
Shift Runway 1 night departures to Runway 6
No Benefit as increased dwelling units north of Runway 24
Combination of Increased arrivals to Runway 1 and departures from Runway 19
Little benefit as increases in units in the mobile home park offset reductions of units along Route 17
Noise abatement flight paths, arrival procedures, and departure procedures
Runway 19 Quiet Visual approach
FAA discontinued procedure for use after publication due to the complexity of flying it
Runway 24 noise abatement departure to 230 heading at night
Reduction of 15 dwelling units in total, 6 of which are within the 70 DNL contour
Noise abatement departure procedures - NBAA high-density NADP
Reduction of 19 dwelling units if used for 88% of of jet departures not held down at or below 3,000 ft.
Airport layout
Runway 1 jet departures starting at Taxiway K intersection
Reduction of 28 dwelling units in the mobile home park
Relocation of maintenance run-ups to center of airfield along Taxiway Q
Reduction of 5 dwelling units in the mobile home park

10. Preferential Runway Use
Shift 25% of Rwy 6 Night Arrivals to Runway 1
Shift 25% of Rwy 24 Night Departures to Rwy 19
These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

11. Preferential Runway Use (cont’d)
Shift 25% of Rwy 1 Night Departures to Rwy 6
Shift 25% of Rwy 6 Night Arrivals to Rwy 1 and 25% of Rwy 24 Night Departures to Rwy 19
These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

12. Preferential Runway Use (cont’d)
We looked at increasing use of the Preferential Runway Use at night
TRACON does not expect the airspace situation to change to allow for more Runway 19 departures at night
Overall the existing program has a benefit and should remain in place

13. Noise Abatement Flight Track: 90% of Night Jet Departures on Runway 24 Assigned 230° Heading
Existing track shown is the jet backbone track with the highest usage
The new 230o departure heading track turns after the end of the runway
Slight reduction in residential land within the 70 DNL contour
Moderate reduction in residential land within the 65 DNL contour
These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

14. NBAA High-Density NADP

15. Departure Procedure: Use of NBAA High-Density NADP to Jet Departures Not Held at or Below 3,000’
Limiting application to departures not held at 3,000’ results in approximately 52% of all jet departures using high-density NADP
North Jersey Vineyard Church to the north of Runway 1/19 is removed from 65 DNL
Pulls the 70 DNL contour onto airport property
Reduces residential land within 65 DNL under Runway 24 departures
These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

16. Airport Layout: Shift the start-of-takeoff-roll point to the Taxiway K intersection for all of Runway 1 jet departures at night
Would lose approximately 550’ of takeoff distance, but takeoff distance is still longer than Runway 6
Voluntary procedure would permit aircraft to use full runway length if needed
Taxiway K intersection
Normal, full-length start-of-takeoff-roll location
Noticeable reduction of contour extent over mobile home park – reduction of 28 dwelling units
These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

17. Proposed runup location along Taxiway Q north of Taxiway G
Airport Layout: Location of All Maintenance Runups in the Center of the Airfield along Taxiway Q
Proposed runup location along Taxiway Q north of Taxiway G
Provides reduction of the 70 DNL contour south of Route 46
Using 60o and 240o headings – with the same split as the existing locations
There is a slight benefit to the mobile home park (reduction of five homes)
These figures are not official Noise Exposure Maps. They are hypothetical cases for deliberative purposes only.

18. Dwelling Unit and Population Analyses
Green highlight is net reduction
Red highlight is net increase
Category
Scenario
65 – 70 DNL
70+ DNL
Total
Dwelling Unit Change from Baseline
Population Change from Baseline
Units
Pop’n
65-70
70+
Baseline
2021 Baseline Operations
180
436 16 39
196
475 -
Runway Use
Shift 25% of Rwy 6 Night Arr.s to Rwy 1
179
433 9 22
188
455 -1 -7 -8 -3
-17
-20
Shift 25% Rwy 24 Night Dep.s to Rwy 19
189
457 10 24
199
481 -6 3 21
-15 6
Shift 25% of Rwy 1 Night Dep.s to Rwy 6
181
438 12 29
193
467 1 -4 2
-10
Shift 25% of Rwy 6 Night Arr.s to Rwy 1 and 25% of Rwy 1 Night Dep.s to Rwy 19
183
443 7
Flight Tracks
90% Night Rwy 24 Jet Dep.s Turn to 230°
171
414 -9
-22
-37
Layout
100% of RW 1 Night Departures Start at Twy K
161
390 17
168
407
-19
-28
-46
-68
All maintenance runups use central location
191
462 -5
-13
NBAA High-Density NADP
Use by 88% of Jet Departures Not Held Down at or Below 3,000 ft.
177
429
-12
-29
Note: Noise abatement procedures must be studied and approved by the FAA for safety and efficiency before any proposed procedure can be implemented.

19. Sensitive Receptors within 65 DNL
Blue checkmark indicates site is wholly or largely within DNL 65
Category
Scenario
Learning Tree Academy Daycare
Bergen County Technical School
(Sound insulated, so compatible)
Catalyst Agape Church (formerly North Jersey Vineyard Church)
Jersey College School of Nursing (Sound insulation status unknown)
Baseline
2021 Baseline Operations
Runway Use
Shift 25% of RW 6 Night Arrivals to Runway 1
Shift 25% RW 24 Night Departures to Runway 19
Shift 25% of RW 1 Night Departures to Runway 6
Shift 25% of RW 6 Night Arrivals to Runway 1 and 25% of Runway 1 Night Departures to Runway 19
Flight Tracks
90% Night Rwy 24 Jet Dep.s Turn to 230°
Layout
100% of RW 1 Night Departures Start at Twy K
NBAA High-Density NADP
Use by 88% of Jet Departures Not Held Down at or Below 3,000 ft.
Removed from contours
Note: Noise abatement procedures must be studied and approved by the FAA for safety and efficiency before any proposed procedure can be implemented.

20. Next Steps Finalize operational recommendations
Develop land use/mitigation recommendations
Develop programmatic recommendations
Draft NCP will be submitted to FAA in August of 2018