Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

API 2017 Exploration and Production Winter Standards Meeting

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "API 2017 Exploration and Production Winter Standards Meeting"— Presentation transcript:

1 API 2017 Exploration and Production Winter Standards Meeting
January API 10D Re-Write Work Group, Update Austin Tx January, 2017

2 Work group on Bow Spring Centralizers (SC-10D) January, 2017: Winter Meeting – Austin TX
Work Group Charge Review and update API Spec 10D to include performance testing requirements for centralizers that are to be used in applications where they are run through restrictions that are smaller than the hole size in which they are to be set. 2

3 WG 10D Roster 24 active members/alts 3 John E. Hebert - Blackhawk ST
130 Equity Blvd. Houma, La Chris Jordan - Blackhawk ST 11936 Brittmoore Park Dr. Houston, Tx 77041 Matthew Goodine – BP 501 Westlake Blvd. Houston, Tx 77079 Brent Lirette – Antelope Oil Tools Co. K.K. (Karl) LaFleur - LaFleur Properties L.C 3

4 WG 10D Roster (p2.) 4 Alfredo Sanchez – Top-Co
David Laurel – Baker Hughes Philip Dufrene – Weatherford 179 Weatherford Dr. Houma, La 70395 Max Rodrigue – Weatherford 4

5 WG 10D Roster (p3.) 5 Charles C Buford Jr– Baker Hughes
Hank Rogers – CE consulting Lonnie Helms– Halliburton Keith Harless - Gryphon David Poole – Chevron George Fuller – Shell James Heathman Wesley Johnson – Downhole Products Downhole Products 4140 World Houston Parkway Suite 160 Houston TX 77032 Cell 5

6 WG 10D Roster (p4.) 6 Andy Boulcott – CenTek Group
Paul Joyce – CenTek Group Brandon Bourg – Weatherford Graham Hay – Downhole Products Michael Szymanski – Shell Forest Parker – Weatherford Ivan Barannikow – Weatherford John McCormick – PVI software 6

7 Work group on Bow Spring Centralizers (SC-10D) Jan 2017: Winter Meetings – Austin, TX
Work Group Status Last met as a WG on November 2nd, 2016 at the API office in Houston. Minutes of the meeting have been published to the API SharePoint site and distributed to members of the work group via . 7

8 Work group on Bow Spring Centralizers (SC-10D) Jan 2017: Winter Meeting – Austin TX
Work Group Status Since the June meetings, all archive files including iterations of the working document and meeting minutes as well as conference presentations have been uploaded to the API SharePoint site (per year folder structure). 8

9 Work group on Bow Spring Centralizers (SC-10D) January, 2017: Winter Meeting – Austin TX
10D Document Status Decision on Table 1 has been made, update to the working document is pending reformatting of the table itself. Basically, limited additional sizes added to Table 1 and in-between sizes can be interpolated while sizes outside the covered range will use formula to determine value. The tolerance on the ID of the outer pipe has been updated to improve test results as well as eliminate a loop hole for use as restriction (was ” ”, now is ” ”). Awaiting responses of a few outstanding action items from Work Group members 9

10 10D Work Group – document status continued:
More discussion was had on the potential impact to restoring force of running the centralizers through the restriction abruptly verses in a staged step-down method (from uncompressed OD to intermediate ID to restriction ID) versus a single step procedure (uncompressed OD directly into restriction ID): It was decided to let a study of the effect on restoring force decide if it is warranted to put in the standard or not. If the difference in restoring force is > the 15% variation, then we will develop and include a modified test procedure for under reamed application. This will allow for stage restriction to prevent permanent deformation to the bows brought about from the high starting force condition.  10

11 10D Work Group – Decision was made to add the proposed reporting format to the document as an example of suggested reporting for use in the modeling software. 11

12 10D Work Group – document status continued
Basically Table 1 is done Definitions are close Test procedures are ready (only awaiting impact study) Pass Fail criterion is clear for both applications (still uses 67% data point and standard conditions) Reporting format resolved and compatible with modeling software We just need to word smith proposed reporting format ….. 12

13 API 2017 Winter Meetings Jan 17, 2017 Austin TX Questions?


Download ppt "API 2017 Exploration and Production Winter Standards Meeting"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google