Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMyron Walker Modified over 7 years ago
1
Committed to making the world’s scientific and medical literature
a public resource “Re-engineering the scientific journal” Mark Patterson, Director of Publishing
2
The functions of journals
Registration Who’s done what and when? Certification Is the work sound? How important is it? Awareness The right information to the people who need it Archiving Preservation for future generations Roosendaal and Geurts
3
The life cycle of a research article
Submission 2-3 Experts Is it rigorous? Good enough? Right audience? Takes months/years Rejects Peer review Journal name is key Publication
5
How can the functions of a journal be re-engineered online?
Awareness Open access Discoverability Certification Focusing on scientific rigour before publication Assessing importance/relevance after publication
6
Awareness Part 1 Open Access
7
Free access ≠ Open access
8
What is open access? Free, immediate access Unrestricted reuse Deposition in a digital public archive Bethesda definition, 2003
9
No permission required for any reuse
Coursepacks Translation A word about copyright – this is the license we use. It’s very important that authors do pay attention to this issue – the signing of a more restrictive license limits the uses to which the literature can be put. Deposit in databases Photocopying No permission required for any reuse Downloading data Reproduction of figures Text mining Redistribution
10
PLoS publishing strategy
This summarizes the broad aims that we have for our publishing operation. Establish high quality journals put PLoS and open access on the map Build a more extensive OA publishing operation an open access home for every paper achieve sustainability Make the literature more useful to scientists and the public
11
PLoS Community Journals June-September, 2005
PLoS Biology October, 2003 PLoS Medicine October, 2004 PLoS Community Journals June-September, 2005 October, 2007 PLoS ONE December, 2006
12
PLoS Progress Report, June 2009
13
PLoS Progress Report, June 2009
15
Awareness Part 2 Discoverability
16
What is open access? Free, immediate access online Unrestricted use
17
What is open access? Free, immediate access online Unrestricted use
18
What is open access? Free, immediate access online Unrestricted use
19
What is open access? Free, immediate access online Unrestricted use
23
Text mining
24
A network of literature
Document A network of literature
25
A network of literature and data
Document Database A network of literature and data
26
Linking Open Data
28
Certification Part 1 Focusing on rigour
30
What makes PLoS ONE different?
Editorial criteria Scientifically rigorous Ethical Properly reported Conclusions supported by the data Editors and reviewers do not ask How important is the work? Instead, that question can be answered after the work is published.
31
What else is different? Inclusive scope
A publication for all science and medicine Encouraging discussion and debate At PLoS ONE – community commenting, rating and annotation Elsewhere – Editorial Board discussion forum; EveryONE blog; Twitter; FriendFeed; Facebook etc Streamlined production Publication on every weekday
32
PLoS ONE – statistics Year Subs Pubs % of annual PubMed 2006 473 138
0.02% 2007 2497 1231 0.16% 2008 4401 2723 0.34% 2009* 6619* 4310* 0.52%* *Targets for 2009 Figures to April 2009 9,195 submissions 5,314 publications 31,700 Published authors 11,021 peer reviewers
33
Certification Part 2 Adding value after publication
34
Measuring impact of research output
Different levels of granularity for different purposes Research groups / institutions - to know who to fund Individual researchers - to know who to promote Individual articles - to know what to read
35
How do we measure impact?
We judge the worth of a paper on the basis of the impact factor of the journal in which it was published. Recommended reading: Adler, R., Ewing, J. Taylor, P. Citation statistics. A report from the International Mathematical Union.
36
How can impact be measured?
Citations Web usage Expert rating Community rating Media/blog coverage Policy development Commenting activity and more…
37
Impact metrics at PLoS Journals
At the article level All PLoS Journals Provide range of metrics not just citations and usage Preference for open data
38
Current View (March ‘09)
39
Current View (March ‘09)
40
CiteULike Landing Page
41
Current View (March ‘09)
42
Postgenomic Landing Page
43
Next steps for article-level metrics
More sources for each data type Citations, blog coverage New data sources F1000, Mendeley Web usage data Provide data and tools Adhere to standards Not a PLoS-only initiative
48
The life cycle of a research article
Submission 2-3 Experts Is it rigorous? Good enough? Right audience? Takes months/years Rejects Peer review Journal name is key Publication
49
The life cycle of a research article
Publication Research Submission Peer review Rejects Enhanced Article More info on impact and relevance Based on activity of an entire community Is it rigorous?
50
The landscape is changing
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.