Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Committed to making the world’s scientific and medical literature

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Committed to making the world’s scientific and medical literature"— Presentation transcript:

1 Committed to making the world’s scientific and medical literature
a public resource “Re-engineering the scientific journal” Mark Patterson, Director of Publishing

2 The functions of journals
Registration Who’s done what and when? Certification Is the work sound? How important is it? Awareness The right information to the people who need it Archiving Preservation for future generations Roosendaal and Geurts

3 The life cycle of a research article
Submission 2-3 Experts Is it rigorous? Good enough? Right audience? Takes months/years Rejects Peer review Journal name is key Publication

4

5 How can the functions of a journal be re-engineered online?
Awareness Open access Discoverability Certification Focusing on scientific rigour before publication Assessing importance/relevance after publication

6 Awareness Part 1 Open Access

7 Free access Open access

8 What is open access? Free, immediate access Unrestricted reuse Deposition in a digital public archive Bethesda definition, 2003

9 No permission required for any reuse
Coursepacks Translation A word about copyright – this is the license we use. It’s very important that authors do pay attention to this issue – the signing of a more restrictive license limits the uses to which the literature can be put. Deposit in databases Photocopying No permission required for any reuse Downloading data Reproduction of figures Text mining Redistribution

10 PLoS publishing strategy
This summarizes the broad aims that we have for our publishing operation. Establish high quality journals put PLoS and open access on the map Build a more extensive OA publishing operation an open access home for every paper achieve sustainability Make the literature more useful to scientists and the public

11 PLoS Community Journals June-September, 2005
PLoS Biology October, 2003 PLoS Medicine October, 2004 PLoS Community Journals June-September, 2005 October, 2007 PLoS ONE December, 2006

12 PLoS Progress Report, June 2009

13 PLoS Progress Report, June 2009

14

15 Awareness Part 2 Discoverability

16 What is open access? Free, immediate access online Unrestricted use

17 What is open access? Free, immediate access online Unrestricted use

18 What is open access? Free, immediate access online Unrestricted use

19 What is open access? Free, immediate access online Unrestricted use

20

21

22

23 Text mining

24 A network of literature
Document A network of literature

25 A network of literature and data
Document Database A network of literature and data

26 Linking Open Data

27

28 Certification Part 1 Focusing on rigour

29

30 What makes PLoS ONE different?
Editorial criteria Scientifically rigorous Ethical Properly reported Conclusions supported by the data Editors and reviewers do not ask How important is the work? Instead, that question can be answered after the work is published.

31 What else is different? Inclusive scope
A publication for all science and medicine Encouraging discussion and debate At PLoS ONE – community commenting, rating and annotation Elsewhere – Editorial Board discussion forum; EveryONE blog; Twitter; FriendFeed; Facebook etc Streamlined production Publication on every weekday

32 PLoS ONE – statistics Year Subs Pubs % of annual PubMed 2006 473 138
0.02% 2007 2497 1231 0.16% 2008 4401 2723 0.34% 2009* 6619* 4310* 0.52%* *Targets for 2009 Figures to April 2009 9,195 submissions 5,314 publications 31,700 Published authors 11,021 peer reviewers

33 Certification Part 2 Adding value after publication

34 Measuring impact of research output
Different levels of granularity for different purposes Research groups / institutions - to know who to fund Individual researchers - to know who to promote Individual articles - to know what to read

35 How do we measure impact?
We judge the worth of a paper on the basis of the impact factor of the journal in which it was published. Recommended reading: Adler, R., Ewing, J. Taylor, P. Citation statistics. A report from the International Mathematical Union.

36 How can impact be measured?
Citations Web usage Expert rating Community rating Media/blog coverage Policy development Commenting activity and more…

37 Impact metrics at PLoS Journals
At the article level All PLoS Journals Provide range of metrics not just citations and usage Preference for open data

38 Current View (March ‘09)

39 Current View (March ‘09)

40 CiteULike Landing Page

41 Current View (March ‘09)

42 Postgenomic Landing Page

43 Next steps for article-level metrics
More sources for each data type Citations, blog coverage New data sources F1000, Mendeley Web usage data Provide data and tools Adhere to standards Not a PLoS-only initiative

44

45

46

47

48 The life cycle of a research article
Submission 2-3 Experts Is it rigorous? Good enough? Right audience? Takes months/years Rejects Peer review Journal name is key Publication

49 The life cycle of a research article
Publication Research Submission Peer review Rejects Enhanced Article More info on impact and relevance Based on activity of an entire community Is it rigorous?

50 The landscape is changing


Download ppt "Committed to making the world’s scientific and medical literature"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google