Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGodfrey Tyler Modified over 7 years ago
1
Obesity in the end stage kidney disease population
Dr Maleeka Ladhani PhD Candidate, Sydney School of Public Health Prof Jonathan Craig, A/P Germaine Wong
2
Framework 1) Prevalence of obesity in the incident and prevalent ESKD population 2) Access to transplantation for those with obesity
3
Prevalence of obesity in ESKD
4
27% 19% Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2015.
Cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic kidney disease— Australian facts: Risk factors. Cardiovascular, diabetes and chronic kidney disease series no. 4. Cat. no. CDK 4. Canberra: AIHW.
5
Aims To describe the trends of obesity in the incident and prevalent Australian and New Zealand ESKD population, over time Specifically stratifying by: country sex age diabetes status modality of renal replacement
6
Methods All adult Australian and New Zealand patients 1995 – 2014
49,884 patients (8,745 NZ - 32% Maori) 286,500 observations over the whole period BMI categorised according to WHO definition
7
Obesity in incident RRT patients
ie BMI at RRT initiation for all adult patients
8
Australia and New Zealand
9
Sex differences - Australia
10
Sex differences – New Zealand
11
Age Aust
12
Age NZ
13
Diabetes -Australia
14
Diabetes – New Zealand
15
Modality – Australia
16
Modality – New Zealand
17
Obesity in prevalent patients
ie all patients on RRT each year
18
Australia and New Zealand
19
Modality – Australia
20
Modality – New Zealand
21
Access to transplantation
22
BMI association with all-cause mortality
Ladhani et al, NDT 2016
23
BMI association with all-cause mortality
Ladhani et al, NDT 2016
24
Chang et al Transplantation 2007
25
Chang et al Transplantation 2007
26
Aims To examine access to transplantation for people with obesity in 3 ways 1) Pre-emptive transplantation 2) Time to first transplant 3) Placement on the waiting list
27
Methods 1) Pre-emptive transplantation 2) Time to first transplant
Descriptive data limited to 2014 2) Time to first transplant Kaplan Meier curve restricted to incident patients <70 years, 3) Placement on the waiting list Logistic regression limited to 2014 and patients <70 years with outcome of listed or not listed Adjusted for relevant confounders +/- centre effect
28
Pre-emptive transplantation
29
Time to transplantation
30
Baseline stats Active (n=1,073) Not active (n=7,551) p-value
Age (yrs) median (IQR) 52.0 (42.0, 61.0) 60.0 (51.0, 68.0) <0.001 Male 661 (61.6%) 4354 (57.7%) 0.014 BMI (kg/m2) Median (IQR) 26.0 (22.7, 29.3) 27.3 (23.1, 32.4) Race Caucasian ATSI Asian Maori/Pacific Other 716 (66.7%) 30 (2.8%) 198 (18.5%) 40 (3.7%) 77 (7.2%) 4728 (62.6%) 1441 (19.1%) 609 (8.1%) 395 (5.2%) 342 (4.5%) Modality - HD - PD 723 (67.4%) 350 (32.6%) 6138 (81.3%) 1413 (18.7%) Baseline stats
31
Baseline stats Active (n=1,073) Not active (n=7,551) p-value
Primary renal disease GN Polycystic Reflux Hypertension DM Other 441 (41.1%) 140 (13.0%) 72 (6.7%) 74 (6.9%) 180 (16.8%) 166 (15.5%) 1789 (23.7%) 441 (5.8%) 278 (3.7%) 684 (9.1%) 3100 (41.1%) 1259 (16.7%) <0.001 Diabetes 268 (25.0%) 4086 (54.4%) Coronary disease 207 (19.3%) 3707 (49.3%) Cerebrovascular disease 75 (7.0%) 1456 (19.4%) PVD 147 (13.7%) 2603 (34.6%) Smoking history 458 (42.9%) 4145 (55.4%)
33
Centre effect modeled as a random intercept
34
Conclusions Obesity is increasingly common in the ESKD population
Despite evidence that long term patient and graft outcomes are not affected by obesity, people with obesity are: less likely to start RRT with a transplant less likely to receive a transplant over time less likely to be on the waiting list for a transplant – despite adjusting for confounders
35
Implications There appears to be a discrepancy in access to transplantation for people with obesity that is not supported by long term outcome studies This needs to be looked at further Thank you to all ANZDATA contributors
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.