Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMilo Randall Modified over 7 years ago
1
Problem Statement Controlling pre-standard coherent Optical Interfaces
draft-many-coherent-dwdm-if-control-00 Gert Grammel Juniper Networks Ruediger Kunze Deutsche Telekom Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Telefonica Gabriele Galimberti Cisco Systems Dharini Hiremagalur Juniper Networks November 2016 IETF 97 - Seoul
2
Motivation The growth of the Internet demands for higher interface rates and DWDM to interconnect Routers. Coherent Transceivers to carry 40G, 100G and 400G are available in the industry, but lack a common data-model to control them So why not just do it? Extending parameters and definitions used for standard non-coherent transceivers has proven to be contentious No firm date by when a standard could become available. Standards bodies are still struggling to document parameters which are required to characterize coherent DWDM interfaces A standard-track data model would require those parameters being identified and considered. November 2016 IETF 97 - Seoul
3
Document Scope A problem statement document is not explicitly required by the IETF but helps guiding a group of drafts The document motivates the need for a pre-standard coherent optical (RRESCO) interface model It particularly sets out a framework of what is NOT in its scope: PRESCO is NOT suggesting to perform data-plane work in IETF. PRESCO is NOT providing data models for non-PRESCO interfaces PRESCO does NOT propose to utilize Data models defined for PRESCO modules to be re-used for standard models when those become available PRESCO does NOT suppose multi-vendor compatibility of PRESCO- Modules on data plane. I.e. a pair of PRESCO-DWDM interfaces having identical parameter sets describing the data-plane MAY not be compatible. November 2016 IETF 97 - Seoul
4
What to expect PRESCO is not aiming for a Science Experiment but sets out to document a model that is good enough to run a network using pre-standard Coherent DWDM interfaces Control work for PRESCO SHALL have the status INFORMATIONAL A PRESCO model SHOULD be based on control parameters available and commonly used in controlling DWDM modules PRESCO modeling SHOULD aim to align with existing data models in IETF and SHALL allow implementers to select augmentation of parameters by vendor specific extensions Since the full set of parameters needed to characterize PRESCO modules and their encoding are to be defined, application codes are not available for use in PRESCO and controlling PRESCO Modules SHALL NOT mandate using application codes the accuracy of measurement values MAY depend on implementation. Hence a protocol SHOULD be able to trim measured values to a normal to make them comparable across implementations. threshold levels derived from measurement values SHOULD be adjustable such that a comparable system behaviour can be achieved. November 2016 IETF 97 - Seoul
5
Next steps Clean up typos and redundant text
Start discussion how to progress with the problem statement Keep it as individual draft Drop it and continue with PRESCO models without the problem statement Merge it with one of the PRESCO Model drafts emerging Make it a WG document aiming for an informational RFC Merge it with the (informational) framework document draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-mng-ctrl-fwk-02 Other? November 2016 IETF 97 - Seoul
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.