1. Stormwater & Pretreatment Team Water Quality Division (512) 239-4671
Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Permitting Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) Updates Trade Fair
May 16-17, 2017
Hanne Lehman Nielsen
Rebecca L. Villalba
Stormwater & Pretreatment Team
Water Quality Division
(512)

2. Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4)
The two images shows a sign with the text “no dumping, drains to bay” and the other image shows a stormwater control.
An MS4 is a publicly owned or operated stormwater drainage system designed to collect and convey stormwater

3. Which MS4s are Regulated?
Medium and Large MS4s (“Phase I”)
Individual TPDES Permits
Small MS4s in Urbanized Areas (Phase II”)
TCEQ Small MS4 General Permit – TXR040000
Combined Phase I and Phase II MS4s
Individual MS4 Permit for Texas Department of Transportation – WQ

4. Phase II MS4 General Permit, TXR04000
Regulates stormwater discharges from publicly owned or operated “Small” MS4s located in urbanized areas (UAs)
Population based on the 2000 and 2010 U.S.Censuses
Renewed December 13, 2013 – 5 year permit term
General
Permit 2007
Authorizations Issued
Permit 2013
Applications Received
NOIs
406
539
Waivers 66 78
Total
472
617
UA – and area of high population density as defined and used by the US Census Bureau in the 2010 census.
We got almost 150 new ones under the 2013 permit
By March 14 there is only 12 that have not renewed
*12 have not renewed yet

5. Phase II MS4 General Permit
Tiered Permitting Approach - based on population in the UA
Level 1 - Up to 10,000
Level ,000 to 40,000
includes non-traditional MS4s
Level ,000 to 100,000
Level 4 - More than 100,000
Waiver option for population less than 1,000
Level 2 includes non-traditional MS4s such as MUDs, Counties, Drainage districts, transportation authorities
Designation of applicable tier is based on population levels of most recent census at the time the NOI is submitted. No changes during the permit term.
*Based on the 2000 and 2010 U.S.Censuses

6. Phase II MS4s Active Authorizations
Level
Active Authorizations 1
107 2
340 3 43 4 11
We have received 501 NOIs and 77 waivers.
Image is a pie chart that represents the numbers of each level. Waivers are also represented. This is done by percentages.

7. Requirements of Phase II MS4s
Develop and Implement a Stormwater Management Program (SWMP)
Develop an implementation schedule
Implement in yearly intervals over the five year permit term
Must be fully implemented at the end of the five year permit term
Coalitions
Develop, implement, and share same SWMP
Usually share a boundary or watershed
Each MS4 is responsible for its own compliance
Agreements with clear delineation of responsibilities
According to 40 CFR Part

8. Requirements of Phase II MS4s
Contents of a SWMP
Six Minimum Control Measures (MCMs)
Operators must address to reduce pollutants from the MS4 to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP)
List of best management practices (BMPs)
Measurable goals
including frequency, month, and year
Schedule for implementation

9. Requirements of Phase II MS4s
Minimum Control Measures (MCMs)
Public Education, Outreach, and Involvement
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
Construction Site Stormwater Runoff Control
Post-Construction Stormwater Management in New Development and Redevelopment
Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
Industrial Stormwater Sources (Level 4 only)
Optional MCM for Construction done by the Permittee (MS4)
Additional requirements for discharges into impaired waterbodies
The MS4s needs to establish measurable goals for each MCM to evaluate and assess the effectiveness of stormwater controls and the SWMP as a whole.
MCM 1: Distribute educational material or do outreach activities about impacts of stormwater discharges on waterbodies. Brochures, billboards, TV, websites. Involve the public stream clean ups - storm drain stenciling - volunteer monitoring - Adopt a Highway programs
MCM 2 – IDDE Detect, investigate, and eliminate illicit discharges to MS4. e.g. sanitary sewer overflow - dumping of used motor oil - sediments leaving a construction site.
MS4 map - staff training - facilitate public reporting - hot line - procedures for responding to illicit discharges and spills
MCM 3 – Construction Ensure construction sites use erosion and sediment controls. : Required to Inspect construction sites - review site plans – train staff - receive information from the public – hot lines.
MCM 4 – Post construction - long term operation and maintenance of structural and nonstructural controls – public and private sites
MCM 5 – Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for municipal operations. O+M program to prevent stormwater pollution from municipal operations. Parks and bridges - streets - ROWs – vehicles - storm sewers - maintenance yards - waste transfer stations – sw controls. List of MS4 facilities - train staff - waste disposal according to existing rules - oversight of contractors.
MCM 6 –Industrial facilities – only for Level 4s – program to control pollutants in SW from industrial facilities.
Must include landfills, municipal waste treatment facilities - Can include other industrial or commercial facilities
Optional 7th MCM – where the MS4 is the construction site operator- can be used as an alternative to the MS4 seeking coverage under the construction general permit (TXR150000)
Implementation of SWMP
Develop a schedule
Implemented in yearly intervals over the 5 year permit term
Must be fully implemented at the end of the 5 year permit term
Coalitions
Develop, implement, and share same SWMP
Usually share a boundary or watershed
Each MS4 is responsible for own compliance
Enter into agreements with clear delineation of responsibilities

10. Impaired Water Bodies Additional Permit Requirements
Category 5 - CWA 303(d) for stream segment, no TMDL
Category 4 - Not on CWA 303(d), with watershed TMDL
Texas Integrated Report Index of Water Quality Impairments
Image of page from texas integrated report
Category 4 - watershed level
Category 5 – stream segment level
Image of creek
Source: –
Image of page fromTexas Integrated Report Index of Water Quality Impairments
Source:

11. Requirements of Phase II MS4s
Annual Report
Due 90 days after reporting year
Flexibility selecting reporting year
Fiscal year, calendar year, or permit year
Reporting year can not change during the permit term
Use Annual Report Template (Form 20561)
Reporting year cannot change during permit term

12. Annual Reports – Helpful Hints
Always send certifications with original signatures, not scanned or copied
Always indicate which reporting year option you have chosen with exact dates of the period
Please respond to s requesting information in a timely manner
This is the time to report your accomplishments and show progress!
Coalition reports should include associated entity with certification signature

13. Phase II Annual Reports
Submit the original report to the TCEQ Stormwater & Pretreatment Team (MC 148)
Submit a copy of the report to the appropriate TCEQ regional office
Specify in the report cover letter that the TCEQ Regional Office has been sent a copy of the report
Retain a copy of the report on site
Annual Report template (Form 20561) available:
Always use the most recent template
SBLG renewed the template for the annual report – will revise again.
It is a requirement to use the template.

14. Phase II Annual Reports
Issues identified during reviews
Late submittals
Cover letter not dated
Not using the most recent annual report template
Impaired water bodies - not including a benchmark value when discharging to a TMDL watershed or indicating the pollutant of concern
Not quantifying activities conducted

15. Phase II MS4 Notice of Change
Notice of change (NOC)
Changes to SWMP
Form: TCEQ – 20392
Submit separately from the Annual Report
NOC is needed to:
Replace an infeasible BMP with an alternative BMP
All other changes specified in permit
NOC is not needed for
Adding BMPs or replacing a BMP with a similar BMP
Non-substantive changes
De-annexing land
The NOC was updated. More changes can be done to the SWMP without submitting an NOC – adding components, controls or requirements to the SWMP or replacing a BMP with an equivalent BMP
Do not submit the NOC with annual reports. Indicate clearly what the changes are in the SWMP. Submit revised pages of SWMP – which clearly show the changes. Use strikeout text.

16. New NPDES Rules – Phase II MS4 Remand Rule 40 CFR §§122.33 and 122.34
Phase II MS4 Remand Rule – Published in Fed. Reg. December 9, 2016 with an effective date of Jan. 9, 2017
The regulations are revised to ensure that:
States determine the adequacy of BMPs and permit requirements
States provide public notice and opportunity for the public to request a public hearing
The rulemaking result from a court decision in 2003 which found that MS4 Phase II regulation did not provide for adequate public notice, the opportunity to request a hearing, or permitting authorities to adequately review BMPs selected in the SWMP.
EPA provided a strike out version of revisions to small MS4 rules (40 CFR §§ and ) and EPA added a paragraph (d) to 40 CFR requiring states to select between two types of general permits

17. New NPDES Rules – Phase II MS4 Remand Rule 40 CFR §§122.33 and 122.34
This is a procedural rule – no substantive changes are made to the Phase II MS4 requirements
Includes two options for states to administer their Phase II MS4 programs
Option 1: Comprehensive general permit approach
The general permit needs to include all requirements necessary to meet the MS4 permit standard “to reduce pollutants to the maximum extent practicable” (MEP).
Option 2: Two-step General Permit
The general permit includes some requirements for all MS4s
The state established additional requirements and BMPs for individual MS4s (this is in the SWMPs).

18. New NPDES Rules – Phase II MS4 Remand Rule 40 CFR §§122.33 and 122.34
All permits must be written with terms that are “clear, specific, and measurable”
The general permits need to use “mandatory” terms and cannot use terms such as:
as practicable, should, encouraged, etc.
if feasible, cannot be used unless it is defined
The permit language needs to be worded in a manner that will help assess compliance and track whether measurable goals have been met by the MS4.
EPA published examples of provisions from general permits across the country

19. New NPDES Rules – Phase II MS4 Remand Rule 40 CFR §§122.33 and 122.34
Certainty in specific actions and requirements
Avoid words such as “if practicable”, “as necessary”, “should”
Clear
Provide level of detail in requirements that portray level of effort(s) needed from MS4 to comply
Specific
Requirement needs to be articulated in a manner to assess compliance in a straightforward way
Measurable

20. New Federal Rules – Electronic Reporting Rule 40 CFR Part 127
Electronic Reporting Rule – effective Dec. 21, 2015
Requires electronic submittal of applications and reports
Phase 1 of Rule: DMRs need to be submitted electronically by Dec. 21, 2016
Phase 2 of Rule: General permit applications (NOIs) and MS4 reports need to be submitted electronically by Dec. 21, 2020

21. New Federal Rules – Electronic Reporting Rule 40 CFR Part 127
Electronic Reporting Rule – effective Dec. 21, 2015
Appendix A of 40 CFR 127 – includes list of elements that need to be reported electronically
Waiver option is available from eReporting (permanent and temporary)
Religious beliefs
No internet access
Training needed

22. Small MS4 General Permit, TXR04000 2018 Renewal
Internal TCEQ input – Feb. 2017
Stakeholder Meeting – March 21, 2017
Comment period ended – April 4, 2017
Development of draft permit – April/June 2017
EPA Review – Fall of 2017
Public comment period – Spring of 2018

23. Proposed Changes to Existing Permit Consistency with other TPDES General Permits
Part I – Definitions
Define “Infeasible” - not technologically possible or not economically practicable and achievable in light of best industry practices
Modify “Construction Activity” to include stockpiling of fill material and demolition
Modify “Waters of U.S.” to remove “cooling ponds”
Part I and Part II.D.4 – Impaired Water Bodies
Add reference to Texas Integrated Report of Surface Water Quality for CWA Sections 305(b) and 303(d) when identifying an impaired water body.
Part VI. – MCM 7
Lower benchmark value for TSS to 50 mg/L from 100 mg/L
Analysis must be done by NELAP certified laboratories

24. Proposed Changes to Existing Permit Consistency with Federal Rules
Electronic Reporting Rule
Add permit language to include eReporting rule – process is starting, details forthcoming
EPA will develop tools to accept applications and reports from small MS4s
Phase II MS4 Remand Rule
Modify permit language to be clear, specific and measurable
Avoid words: if practicable, as necessary, should, encouraged to
Use mandatory words: must and shall

25. Proposed Changes to Existing Permit Examples of clear, specific, and measurable
MCM 1. Public Education, Outreach, and Involvement
If feasible, consider using use public input (for example, the opportunity for public comment, or public meetings) in the implementation of the program
MCM 2. IDDE
Inspections – The permittee shall conduct inspections as determined appropriate, in response to complaints, and shall conduct follow-up inspections as needed to ensure that corrective measures have been implemented by the responsible party.
The permittee shall develop written procedures describing the
basis for conducting inspections in response to complaints

26. Proposed Changes to Existing Permit For all MS4s
Part II.A.5 Categories of Regulated MS4s
Annexation of land resulting in a level change:
Clarification of requirement to submit an Notice of Change
Within 90 days have a plan for implementing the SWMP in new areas
Implement program in new areas as expeditiously as practicable but no less than three years
Part II.D.4 Impaired water bodies and TMDL Requirements
Clarify terms – benchmarks, decorative ponds, pet waste
Clarified requirement to check if a water body within the MS4s permitted area has been added to the latest 305(b)/303(d) list.
Newly impaired waterbodies must be addressed in the SWMP.
Definitions are to be consistent with other GPs

27. Proposed Changes to Existing Permit For all MS4s
Part II.E.3 Stormwater Management Program
New requirement to review the SMWP once a year in conjunction with completion of the annual report.
Clarification that annexing or de-annexing land that results in a level change will require an NOC
Part III.A. (2) Content of the SWMP
New requirement that measurable goals selected must be “clear, specific and measurable”
Part III.B. MCM 1
Publish SWMP and annual report on MS4s public website – if MS4 has one
Definitions are to be consistent with other GPs

28. Proposed Changes to Existing Permit For Level 4 MS4s only
Part III. B. 2 MCM 2. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
Clarify that MS4s identify priority areas likely to have illicit discharges
Add a program to control the discharge of floatables into the MS4
Part III.B. 5. MCM 5. Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
Add a program to evaluate new and existing flood management projects for their water quality impact
Part III.B.6. MCM 6. Industrial Stormwater Sources
Clarification of language to include priorities and procedures for inspections to existing program

29. Phase I MS4s Medium and Large MS4s
Municipal population 100,000+ (1990 U.S.Census)
Includes public entities in the UA
Transportation authorities, universities, counties, districts, etc.
Universe: 22 individual TPDES permits
Includes 50 permittees due to coalitions
Individual permits. Original applications were sent to EPA in No new phase 1 permits will be issued. Coverage is provided for all areas within Jurisdictional Boundaries such as city limits, TxDOT ROW within the city limits, universities within a regulated city based by rule, on 1990 US Census.
Universe will soon change to 22 indv. permits. (TxDOT Austin, Dallas, Beaumont, and Houston will disappear and get under the TxDOT statewide permit)
*No new permits issued

30. Requirements of Phase I MS4s
Develop a SWMP to address MCMs in permits
Public Education and Outreach/Public Involvement and Participation
Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping for Municipal Operations
MS4 Maintenance Activities
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
Construction Site Runoff
Post-Construction Control Measures
Industrial & High Risk Runoff
Content of Permits
More similar to phase II – permit renewal started in 2011 combined program elements into 8 categories and renamed them Minimum Control Measures (MCMs)

31. Requirements of Phase I MS4s
Monitoring Requirement Options
Representative Storm Events
Representative Rapid Bioassessment or
Watershed Monitoring
Regional Wet Weather Characterization Program

32. Requirements of Phase I MS4s
Monitoring of Floatables
Often required in two locations at a frequency two times per year
Report the amount collected
Submit Annual Reports
TCEQ reviews and provides feedback

33. TxDOT MS4 Statewide Individual Permit WQ0005011000
Permit was issued on Nov. 30, 2016
Coverage replaces
TxDOT responsibilities in 11 Phase I MS4 permits where TxDOT was a copermittee
4 Phase I MS4 TxDOT permits
19 Phase II MS4 authorizations under the Phase II GP
Coverage includes 22 new Phase II MS4 areas
EPA and TCEQ and TXDOT had meetings in 2012 and TxDOT and TCEQ had meetings in 2013.
It is a complex permit and therefore delayed.

34. TxDOT MS4 Statewide Individual Permit WQ0005011000
All requirements in Phase I and Phase II MS4 permits are carried over into TxDOT permit
Previous Phase I MS4 co-permittees reapply without TxDOT
Image is a sign saying “Welcome to Texas – Drive Friendly – The Texas Way

35. Phase I MS4s Permit Renewals
EPA Review of the Renewals from 2011
Requiring similar requirements as in the Phase II MS4 General Permit
Priority areas
MS4 maps
Impaired waterbodies
Requesting to see inspection or audit reports completed by TCEQ
List of priority areas was included in one permit
List of construction sites and procedures for inspection of industrial sources added to multiple permits
We included a mapping of the MS4 system requirement.
TMLD requirements similar to Phase II GP
All of them have been reissued except 5 permits plus a statewide MS4 permit for TxDOT:
Waco, City of Corpus Christi, Houston Task Force, San Antonio, Houston Port Authority
TxDOT   - published notice
Four permit will disappear: TxDOT Austin, TxDOT Dallas, TxDOT Beaumont and TxDOT Houston
Permits withTxDOT are issued without because TxDOT is applying for its own statewide individual permit.

36. Phase I MS4 Permit Renewals
All permits will be revised to address comments made by EPA on previous MS4 permits
Measurable goals are required for MCMs
Provision from existing permits are continued
E-Reporting Rule provisions for DMRs and annual reports
No other major changes are expected
Use application form TCEQ (no changes)
Attachment 4 – will be requested by permit writer
Senate Bill 709 – legislative notice requirement
TCEQ started implementing Senate Bill 709 on Sept 1, Once a permit is drafted notice is send out to the local legislators.

37. Phase I MS4 Permit Renewals
Permit applications received in 2015 – 2016
City of Dallas
City of Mesquite
City of Austin – EPA Objection
City of Garland
City of Fort Worth, Tarrant Regional Water District
City of Beaumont, Jefferson County Drainage District 6
City of Abilene – EPA Objection
North Texas Tollway Authority – EPA Objection
University of Texas at Austin – EPA Objection
City of El Paso – EPA Objection
City of Pasadena
City of Laredo and Laredo Community College
in 2015 – 2016 we have received 12 permit applications

38. Phase I MS4 Permit Renewals
MS4 permits that moved to the TxDOT Statewide MS4 permit
TxDOT - Dallas
TxDOT - Austin
TxDOT - Beaumont
TxDOT - Houston District (Pasadena)
Permits still pending from 2011 renewal
City of Corpus Christi, PCCA, Del Mar College District, Texas A&M
City of San Antonio
City of Houston, Harris Co., Harris County Flood Control District
three permits are expired and still pending - drafted and are in various stages for renewal process.
Four TxDOT permits will not get renewed – they got under the TxDOT Statewide MS4 permit

39. TPDES Stormwater Program Contacts
Water Quality Division
Stormwater & Pretreatment Team
Rebecca L. Villalba, Team Leader
Lindsay Garza, Work Leader
Hanne Lehman Nielsen
Dan Siebeneicher
Gordon Cooper
Kent Trede
Jessica Alcoser
Austin Office: (512)
This is a list of the members of the stormwater team
The image is of a business style phone

40. Contact Information
Small Business and Local Government Assistance (SBLGA)
(800)
Permitting Information (Technical)
(512)
Phone numbers, addresses and links are given for SBLGA and the Stormwater team
The image is of a hand holding a green marker and the words “call us” written out