Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Organizational Structure and Controls

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Organizational Structure and Controls"— Presentation transcript:

1 Organizational Structure and Controls

2 The Strategic Management Process Strategy Formulation
Strategic Intent External Environment Internal Environment Strategic Mission The Strategic Management Process Strategic Outcomes Actions Strategic Inputs Strategy Formulation Strategy Implementation Business-level Strategy Competitive Dynamics Corporate-Level Strategy International Strategy Corporate Governance Structure & Control Strategic Competitiveness Above Average Returns Feedback 10

3 Structure and Controls Definitions
Organizational Structure Organizational structure specifies the firm’s formal reporting relationships, procedures, controls, and authority and decision-making processes It is critical to match organizational structure to the firm’s strategy Organizational Controls Guide the use of strategy Indicate how to compare actual results with expected results Suggest corrective actions to take when the difference between actual and expected results is unacceptable When properly matched with the strategy for which they were intended, structure and controls can be a competitive advantage. Strategic controls (largely subjective criteria) and financial controls (largely objective criteria) are the two types of organizational controls used to successfully implement the firm’s chosen strategy. Both types of controls are critical, although their degree of emphasis varies based on individual matches between strategy and structure.

4 Structure Types All organizations require some form of organizational structure to implement and manage their strategies Firms frequently alter their structure as they grow in size and complexity Three basic structure types: Change strategy – change structure Functional Structure Multi-divisional Structure (M-form) Simple Structure 5

5 Strategy & Structure Growth Patterns Multidivisional Structure
Sales Growth Coordination & Control Problems Efficient implementation of formulated strategy Functional Structure Sales Growth Coordination & Control Problems Key driver to this evolution is Sales growth which eventually result in coordination and control problems. Efficient implementation of formulated strategy Simple Structure 5

6 Simple Structure Owner / Manager
Owner/Manager makes all major decisions directly and monitors all activities Difficult to maintain this structure as the firm grows in size and complexity 6

7 Functional Structure First stage beyond a Simple Structure
Appropriate for single or dominant-business firms Allows specialization of tasks * Production * Finance * Engineering * Accounting * Sales & Marketing * Human Resources Overcomes information processing limits of single owner/manager Functional department heads report to Chief Executive Officer who integrates decisions and actions from a company-wide point of view Risks conflicts between myopic function managers 17

8 Chief Executive Officer
Functional Structure Chief Executive Officer Production Finance Engineering Accounting Sales & Marketing Human Resources Corporate Finance Corporate R&D Corporate Marketing Corporate Human Resources Strategic Planning MATCHES BETWEEN BUSINESS-LEVEL STRATEGIES AND THE FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE Different forms of the functional organizational structure are used to support implementation of the cost leadership, differentiation, and integrated cost leadership/differentiation strategies. The differences in these forms are accounted for primarily by different uses of three important structural characteristics or dimensions—specialization (concerned with the type and number of jobs required to complete work), centralization (the degree to which decision-making authority is retained at higher managerial levels), and formalization (the degree to which formal rules and procedures govern work). ************************************************************************** NOTE: Rather than a functional structure organized around functions, the firm may organize around “products” 18

9 Functional Structure for Cost Leadership Strategy
Office of the President Marketing Engineering Operations Personnel Accounting Operations is main function Process engineering is emphasized rather than new product R&D Formalized procedures allow for low-cost culture Structure is mechanical; job roles are highly structured Relatively large centralized staff coordinates functions Centralized Staff 10

10 Functional Structure for Differentiation Strategy
President and Limited Staff Marketing New Product R&D Operations Human Resources Finance R&D The functional structure is most appropriate for an integrated low-cost/differentiation strategy. Marketing is the main function for tracking new product ideas New product R&D is emphasized Most functions are decentralized Formalization is limited to foster change and promote new ideas Overall structure is organic; job roles are less structured 10

11 Multi-Divisional Structure
The decision-making of managers in a Multi-Divisional structure may be: Centralized or Decentralized Bureaucratic or Non-bureaucratic Balance on these dimensions may change over time The goal is to maximize overall firm performance Changes in strategy Degree of diversification Geographic scope Nature of competition Structure will evolve over time with: 34

12 Multi-Divisional Structure
Variations of the Multi-Divisional Structure Multi-Divisional Structure (M-form) Strategic Business Unit (SBU) Structure Cooperative Form Competitive Form Related-Constrained Strategy Related-Linked Strategy Unrelated /Holding Company Strategy 21

13 Related-Constrained Strategy
Cooperative Form Related-Constrained Strategy President Government Affairs Legal Affairs Corporate R&D Lab Strategic Planning CorporateHuman Resources Corporate Finance CorporateMarketing Product Division Product Division Product Division Product Division Product Division Structural integration devices create tight links among all divisions Large corporate office with R&D likely to be centralized Culture emphasizes cooperative sharing 35

14 SBU Form Related-Linked Strategy President Strategic Business Unit A
Corporate Finance Corporate R&D Corporate Marketing Strategic Planning Corporate Human Resources Division Division Strategic Business Unit A Strategic Business Unit B Strategic Business Unit C Strategic Business Unit D Structural integration exists among divisions within SBUs, but not across SBUs Each SBU may have its own budget for staff to foster integration Corporate headquarters staff serve as consultants to SBUs and divisions 43

15 Unrelated /Holding Company Strategy
Competitive Form Unrelated /Holding Company Strategy President Legal Affairs Finance Auditing Division Division Division Division Division Corporate headquarters has a small staff Finance and auditing are the most prominent functions in the headquarters Divisions are independent and separate for financial evolution purposes Divisions retain strategic control, but cash is managed by the corporate office Divisions compete for corporate resources 36

16 Multi-Divisional Structure
The choice between centralization and decentralization is frequently based on the business-level strategy implemented in each division Cost Leadership Decentralization Differentiation Centralization Complex Multi-Divisional structure firms may be simultaneously centralized and decentralized , depending upon the various business-level strategies employed throughout the firm’s individual businesses Define strategic and financial controls: Strategic controls are also used to evaluate the degree to which the firm is focusing on what is required to implement its strategies. ·      For a business-level strategy, the interest is to study primary and support activities to verify that those that are critical to successful execution of the chosen strategy are being properly emphasized and executed. ·      With related corporate-level strategies, strategic controls are used to verify that intended levels of sharing of relevant strategic factors such as knowledge, markets, technologies and so forth are taking place. When evaluating related diversification strategies, executives must have a deep understanding of each unit’s business-level strategy. Extensive diversification often requires that financial controls be emphasized. Note: The use of strategic controls—which are behavioral in nature—requires high levels of cognitive diversity among the firm’s top-level managers. Cognitive diversity is a term that captures differences among top-level executives regarding their beliefs about cause-and-effect relationships and outcome-related preferences. Financial controls are largely objective criteria used to measure the firm’s performance against previously established quantitative standards, and these include accounting-based (e.g., return on investment; return on assets) and market-based (e.g., Economic Value Added) measures. Both strategic and financial controls are important aspects of each organizational structure; thus, any structure’s effectiveness is determined by using a combination of strategic and financial controls. ****************************************************************************** Multi-Divisional structure firms use a combination of: Financial Controls Strategic Controls 48

17 Attributes of Various Structural Forms
Structural Characteristics Degree of Centralization Use of Integrating Mechanisms Divisional Performance Appraisal Incentive Compensation Type of Strategy Cooperative M-Form SBU M-Form Competitive M-Form Related- Constrained Related Linked Unrelated Centralized at Corporate Office Centralized in SBUs Decentralized to Division Extensive Synergies Moderate Nonexistent The underlying premise of the balanced scorecard is that firms disadvantage their future performance possibilities when financial controls are emphasized at the expense of strategic controls, in that financial controls provide feedback about outcomes achieved from past actions, but do not communicate the drivers of the firm’s future performance. Thus, an overemphasis on financial controls could promote organizational behavior that has a net effect of sacrificing the firm’s long-term value creating potential for short-term performance gains Financial Criteria Strategic & Subjective/ Strategic Linked to Corporate Performance Corporation, Division & SBU Divisional 76

18 Corporate-Level International Strategies Need for Global Integration
When is each strategy appropriate? Need for Global Integration Need for Local Market Responsiveness Low High Global Strategy Trans- national Multi- Domestic Type of Corporate Strategy selected will have an impact on the selection and implementation of the business-level strategies 53

19 Evolution of Multi-Divisional Structure
Chief Executive Officer Corporate Office (Staff) North America Australia Europe Asia Latin America Africa Product A Product B Product C Product D Product A 40

20 Chief Executive Officer Corporate Office (Staff)
Evolution of Multi-Divisional Structure Multi-Domestic International Strategy Chief Executive Officer Corporate Office (Staff) North America Latin America Europe Asia Africa Australia Product A Product B Product C Product D Product A A Structural evolution based on Geographic lines usually implies a Multi-Domestic International Strategy 41

21 Implementation of a Multidomestic Strategy
Worldwide Geographic Area Structure Multinational Headquarters Asia United States Latin America Europe Australia Middle East/ Africa Green circles indicate decentralization of operations Emphasis is on differentiation by local demand to fit a culture Corporate headquarters coordinates financial resources among independent subsidiaries The organization is like a decentralized federation 76

22 Evolution of Multi-Divisional Structure
Chief Executive Officer Corporate Office (Staff) Product A Product B Product C Product D A Structural evolution based on Product lines usually implies a Global International Strategy 39

23 Implementation of a Global Strategy
Worldwide Product Divisional Structure Multinational Headquarters Worldwide Products Division Green circle indicates centralization to coordinate information flow among worldwide products Headquarters uses many intercoordination devices to facilitate global economies of scale and scope Headquarters also allocates financial resources cooperatively The organization is like a centralized federation 76

24 Evolution of Multi-Divisional Structure
A Transnational International Strategy is likely to utilize a structure that results in emphasis on both geographic and product structures 42

25 Strategic Networks A Strategic Network is a grouping of organizations that has been formed to create value through participation in an array of cooperative arrangements, such as a strategic alliance A Strategic Center Firm often manages the network The Strategic Center Firm identifies actions that increase the opportunity for each firm to achieve success through its participation in the network The Strategic Center Firm creates incentives that reduce the probability of any single firm taking advantage of its network partners 82

26 A Strategic Network Strategic Center Firm Network Firms 88

27 Strategic Center Firm’s Critical Functions
Strategic Outsourcing Capability Development Strategic Center Firm Technology Sharing Note: The strategic center is charged directly with increasing sales, although, the outcome of the above practices should result in an increase in sales. Building Linkages to Facilitate Learning 83

28 Building Linkages to Facilitate Learning
Strategic Center Firm Strategic center firm emphasizes to partners the need to build linkages between value chains and networks of value chains. The strategic network seeks to develop a competitive advantage in primary or support activities 100

29 A Distributed Strategic Network
Main Strategic Center Firm Distributed Strategic Center Firms International Cooperative Strategies often require more complex networks Many large multinational firms form distributed strategic networks with multiple regional strategic centers to manage their array of cooperative arrangements with partner firms Breaking large networks into multiple manageably-sized networks helps to manage the complexity of maintaining many relationships 107


Download ppt "Organizational Structure and Controls"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google