Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Using SNAP E&T to Support job-Driven Training Programs

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Using SNAP E&T to Support job-Driven Training Programs"— Presentation transcript:

1 Using SNAP E&T to Support job-Driven Training Programs
Kaila Wilson, SNAP Office of Employment & Training, FNS NCWE Conference- Keeping the Promises of Workforce Education, October 12, 2016

2 Thinking about Programs that Serve Low-Skilled and Low-Income People Differently

3 Putting it in context: Why skills matter

4 Today’s Jobs Require a Higher Level of Skills
By 2020, two-thirds of all jobs will require post-secondary education and training beyond high school At the current rate of production, The U.S. will fall short by 5 million workers with postsecondary education by 2020 Source: Job Growth and Education Requirements Through 2020, Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce

5 Skills of SNAP Participants
40 percent of SNAP participants are not high school graduates More likely to participate longer-term in SNAP than their higher-educated peers Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014 and U.S. Census Bureau Analysis of Survey of Income and Program Participation Data, 2004 Long-term = 37 months out of last 48 months

6 Job Change in Recession and Recovery
Source: America’s Divided Recovery: College Haves and Have-Nots, Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce

7 Addressing the Skills Gap

8 Lack of skilled workforce impacting employers

9 Connecting Skills and SNAP E&T

10 SNAP E&T as Part of the Skilled Workforce Solution
We have two problems we should never have at the same time: People who are struggling to find decent, stable employment; and Employers who are struggling to find workers with the right skills SNAP E&T can play an important role in addressing both of these needs By supporting skills training programs that lead to industry recognized certificates and credentials and are linked to employment, we can move SNAP participants toward economic self-sufficiency and also help meet the skilled workforce needs of employers

11 SNAP E&T a Priority from the
High priority for Secretary Vilsack Focused on moving people off of SNAP the right way Understands the power of a decent job to improve people’s lives Equally high priority for Under Secretary Concannon Focused on expanding the core SNAP E&T program Sees an opportunity for states to make full use of their 100 percent funds, increase use of funds Making calls to States, talking about E&T in speeches, sending letters— sending the clearest, strongest message possible about the interest in and importance of this program to the agency National and Regional Offices working together to implement this vision

12 Where we started…

13 Where we’re going…

14 Full Assessments and Screenings
Component Offerings Matched to Needs and Skills of Participants Enhanced by Collaboration Supports Flexibility Wide Variety of Service and Supports “If you set out to design a job training program for low-skilled, low-income workers, it would look like SNAP E&T” Lends itself to career pathways, including supportive services Bridge between programs and across institutions Flexible services based on the needs of participants

15 SNAP E&T 101

16 Purpose of the E&T Program
To assist members of SNAP households in gaining skills, training, work, or experience that will increase their ability to obtain regular employment. Section 6(d)(4) of the Food and Nutrition Act

17 What is SNAP E&T? Right now, USDA provides ~$300 million annually to states to operate SNAP Employment and Training programs All states are required to operate E&T programs and must submit an annual E&T plan In FY 2015, SNAP E&T served about 1 million participants (up from about 650,000 in FY 2014) States have considerable flexibility in designing E&T programs that meet the needs of participants and employers

18 Who is Eligible for SNAP E&T?
Are able to work upon program completion. Do not receive TANF cash assistance; and Are receiving SNAP in the month they participate in a component--except for job retention; SNAP recipients who: SNAP and SNAP E&T do not have participation time limits States can operate mandatory or voluntary programs

19 Extremely Flexible in Design & Services
Workfare Work Experience Case Management, Support Services Job Search Job Search Training Job Retention Education (e.g. Adult Basic Education, ESL, Vocational Training) Self Employment SNAP E&T can support an extremely wide array of activities, including: Employment and training services (“components”)—job search, job search training, work readiness, ABE, ESL, GED®, occupational or technical training, apprenticeships or pre- apprenticeships, WIOA, postsecondary education, etc. Administrative activities—case management, career navigators, success coaches, job developers, etc. Support services (“participant reimbursements”)—must include transportation and dependent care assistance if necessary, may include books, tools, uniforms, licensing fees, dues, eye glasses, etc.

20 Supportive Services Reasonably necessary and directly related to participation in E&T activities. Examples: Transportation Child care Books and supplies Equipment and supplies needed for training Uniforms Licensing fees SNAP E&T participants must be provided with participant reimbursements (i.e. supportive services)

21 Unique Funding Opportunities
Federal SNAP E&T funding 100% funds ($90M) Pledge (ABAWD) funds ($20M) 50-50 funds (uncapped) Administrative reimbursement Participant reimbursement In a time of limited resources, E&T can bring new capacity to the system States are currently leaving money on the table Rare opportunity to leverage existing investments

22 50-50 Reimbursement Funds Where the real potential of the program is
Covers both administrative costs and participant costs Extremely flexible funding Covers wide array of allowable costs Can be aligned with other funding streams to fill in “gaps” Right now, this is largely an untapped resource 50-50 Reimbursement Funds

23 Show Me the Money State, county, or city funds
Donations from private firms or non-profits Foundation funds Social venture funds (e.g. Goodwill store revenues) *Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) State Need Grants State Worker Retraining Dollars State Opportunity Grants Tuition set-aside resources Other state training funds (ex-offender, homeless, non-custodial parents)

24 Third-Party Partnerships

25 State SNAP Agency and Provider Partnership
Sometimes also referred to as third-party “match” programs or third-party reimbursement programs E&T services are provided by third parties, such as community colleges and community based organizations Partners pay for services and get reimbursed 50% through Federal funding State contracts with provider for E&T services Provider uses non-federal funds, submits claim for reimbursement through the State FNS reimburses State for 50% of allowable expenses States passes reimbursement back to partner

26 SNAP E&T and Community Colleges
Community colleges are: An integral part of the job-driven training system, often with existing connections to career pathway program, adult basic education, apprenticeships, and integrated learning models A point of entry for low-skilled job seekers An important link to employers Affordable and accessible Ideal community college partners: Can expand existing capacity to serve new students or provide additional services Have administrative capacity to operate an E&T program Have access to sources of non-federal funds Offer additional resources to mitigate barriers and support participation (can be by partnering with CBOs) Track outcomes and continuously evaluates and improves programs Use of E&T funds for community colleges: E&T funds can pay for administrative costs, tuition, books and fees, equipment and supplies, transportation, child care, other supports deemed “reasonable and necessary” E&T funds can help SNAP recipients afford the transition into college until traditional financial aid is available States can use 100% grant funds to purchase training slots for SNAP recipients (can create whole classes) Colleges can use non-federal funds to pay for allowable costs and receive a 50% reimbursement

27 Co-Enrollment Non-Duplication of Services
Wrap-Around Support Provider Education & Training Provider

28 Challenges Benefits Pros and Cons Tracking non-federal funding sources
Maximize dollars already being spent to serve SNAP recipients Expand the types of services available without added State expenditures Allow CBOs and colleges to expand capacity and serve more individuals Create a new funding stream to pay for much needed participant supports Help organizations administer program Ideally, begins to align programs and systems Increase employment and earning for SNAP recipients Challenges Must establish in advance Must work through State (or county) SNAP agency Can be administratively complex Must verify SNAP eligibility Anticipating service levels throughout the year Tracking non-federal funding sources Financing can be difficult, especially at start-up Tracking non-federal funding sources Verifying SNAP eligibility Complex invoicing process Anticipating service levels throughout the year Annual budgeting process Pros State SNAP agency conserves funds and resources while offering new or additional E&T services Partners who are already serving eligible population are able to expand services or the number of clients served Cons Not every organization has the capacity to be an E&T partner. Smaller organizations may have a hard time tracking and meeting the reporting requirements for a Federal grant. Important questions to ask: What services does the provider offer? Are the services appropriate E&T activities? What is the capacity of the third-party provider? Who will have what responsibility? Responsibilities of provider Secure allowable source of non-Federal funds Place, monitor, and support participants Track costs and comply with Federal rules Maintain appropriate documentation for expenses Maintain sufficient funds to support the program in the absence of Federal reimbursement

29 Resources & Tools

30 First-ever large-scale technical assistance project to support growth in SNAP E&T
Focused on job-driven programs Funded by FNS, led by SJI Targeted Technical Assistance 10 States: Arkansas, Arizona, California, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Tennessee Materials/Resources Monthly newsletter about SNAP E&T “Workbook” to help States work through steps to develop and operationalize SNAP E&T program 10 Policy briefs on best practices in SNAP E&T Success stories Webinars

31 Things You Can Do Visit the FNS website guidance Read our SNAP E&T Toolkit /ET_Toolkit_2013.pdf Visit the recently launched SNAP to Skills website : Read our new policy briefs on why now is the time for States to build their SNAP E&T programs and SNAP E&T and ABAWDs Sign up to receive our new SNAP E&T newsletter Checkout what is happening in States and read successful stories about SNAP E&T participants around the country

32 People You Can Talk To Christine Ruggieri (NERO) Derrick Dolphin (MARO) Nick Espinosa (SERO) Ray Prendergast (MWRO) Jason Turner (SWRO) Karla Maraccini (MPRO) Brian Solomon (WRO)

33 Kaila Wilson SNAP Office of Employment and Training My Contact Information


Download ppt "Using SNAP E&T to Support job-Driven Training Programs"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google