Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDorthy Wheeler Modified over 7 years ago
1
Dr. Frank Verbeke Vrije Universiteit Brussel Kigali Health Institute
Secondary use of electronic health records Measuring the impact of health insurance status on health services consumption and in-hospital mortality Dr. Frank Verbeke Vrije Universiteit Brussel Kigali Health Institute
2
Health insurance and health outcomes
Many studies suggest a relationship between health insurance and outcomes (such as mortality) Most research coming from industrialized countries Few studies in sub-Saharan region Different medical therapeutics Different demography of insured patients Purpose of this study: Evaluate usability of routinely registered electronic patient data for documenting relationship between health insurance status, health services consumption and mortality in a tertiary reference hospital in Rwanda
3
Health insurance coverage in Rwanda
More than 90% of the population covered by some form of health insurance in 2012 Government employees (RAMA) Military & police (MMI) Community based health insurance (70%) Private health insurance companies (1%) Out of pocket (OOP) payments for insured patients vary between 0% and 15%
4
Study site & data set Study site: Kigali University Teaching Hospital
3rd level national reference hospital OpenClinic GA HIS (free open source) Data set 15,825 hospital admissions in the period Insurance status Less than 25% OOP payments = insured n = 14,313 encounters More than 75% OOP payments = uninsured n = 1,512 encounters
5
Disease classification
Aggregation of international disease classification codes into DRGs ICD-10 and ICPC-2 based disease classification available at CHUK since 2006 Development of local DRG system (KPGS) since 2009 Simplified DRG set of 174 codes based on ICD-10 Adapted to sub-Saharan setting Selection of 11 DRG-collections for analysis of health insurance impact
6
Disease classification (2)
DRG-set DRG (KPGS) codes 1. Traumatology & Burns 190,19A and 19B 2. Cancer 02A to 02D 3. Diabetes 04B 4. Tuberculosis 01B 5. HIV/AIDS 01M 6. Cardiovascular diseases 09A to 09R 7. Pneumonia 10C 8. Digestive diseases 11A to 11S 9. Malaria 01V 10. Genital-urinary diseases 140 11. Pregnancy related problems 15A and 15B
7
Care consumption Health care services invoiced to patient and/or insurer (procedures, drugs, consumables...) through the HIS Clinician-generated weight factor λ between 0 and 1 for each health service per DRG Consensus document from team of 12 physicians for all DRGs In case of multi-DRG clinical conditions Disability weights based distribution of consumed health services over DRGs using CALCO method Care consumption score ɛ calculated per DRG for insured and uninsured patients Δɛ = difference between insured and uninsured
8
ɛi ɛu Δɛ 1. Traumatology & Burns 39,96 27,84 +43,53% 2. Cancer 33,13
DRG-group ɛi ɛu Δɛ 1. Traumatology & Burns 39,96 27,84 +43,53% 2. Cancer 33,13 29,51 +12,29% 3. Diabetes 37,54 27,31 +37,49% 4. Tuberculosis 40,25 30,32 +32,75% 5. HIV/AIDS 35,68 27,53 +29,63% 6. Cardiovascular diseases 32,78 22,65 +44,72% 7. Pneumonia 29,11 21,74 +33,89% 8. Digestive diseases 38,24 26,53 +44,15% 9. Malaria 29,50 23,32 +26,50% 10. Genital-urinary diseases 35,67 29,01 +22,95% 11. Pregnancy related problems 29,74 +11,39% All DRGs 35,34 n=14313 SD=61,12 28,08 n=1512 SD=42,56 +25,87% P<0.001
9
Care consumption (2) 26% higher health services consumption in group of insured patients No significant difference in total admission cost per DRG between insured and uninsured Higher tariffs applied for uninsured patients Δɛ stable per DRG between 2009 and 2012 in spite of changing insured patients demographics (more poor people insured)
10
Hospital bound mortality
Definition % of patients treated for DRG x that eventually died in the hospital (not necessarily from DRG x) Significant 19% lower mortality in the insured patients group compared to the uninsured group For 7 of the 11 DRG-groups, mortality was more than 40% lower in the insured group
11
Hospital bound mortality (2)
DRG-group Δmortality 1. Traumatology & Burns -52,70% * 2. Cancer -44,81% * 3. Diabetes -55,44% * 4. Tuberculosis 3,61% 5. HIV/AIDS -5,34% 6. Cardiovascular diseases -40,28% * 7. Pneumonia -52,51% * 8. Digestive diseases -46,24% * 9. Malaria -21,98% 10. Genito-urinary diseases -44,50% * All DRGs -19,14% Hospital bound mortality (2)
12
Discussion Study confirmed for sub-Saharan reference hospital setting
Insured patients get more care for the same clinical conditions Insured patients have lower mortality for the same clinical conditions Health service consumption score ɛ Heavily impacted by weight factor λ for health services Health service distribution not significantly different between insured and uninsured => λ value has no impact on Δɛ
13
Discussion (2) EHR data prove to be usefull and convenient for monitoring HI impact Causal relationship health insurance status care consumption & mortality? Many confounding factors Age & gender: no significant differences Income, employment status, education, exercise, tobacco & alcohol, body-mass index, marital status... Δmortality & Δɛ constant in spite of important shift from non-insured to insured (mainly poorer population groups) Δmortality & Δɛ very significant for non-communicable chronic diseases Cancer, hypertension, stroke & diabetes Growing importance in sub-Saharan region: NHI cost impact!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.