Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Measurement of Secondary Neutrons Produced from Thin Graphite stripper by 50 MeV/n U Beams
Nam-Suk Jung, Arim Lee, Hee-Seock Lee, Leila Mokhtari Oranj, Mahdi Bakhtiari Pohang Accelerator Laboratory / POSTECH, South Korea Noriaki Nakao Shimizu Corp. Japan Yoshitomo Uwamino RIKEN Nishina Center, Japan
2
Experiments at RIBF of RIKEN Nishina Center
Outline Introduction Experiments at RIBF of RIKEN Nishina Center Results and Comparison with MC calculation - PHITS, FLUKA Summary 2
3
Introduction – RAON accelerator
Rare Isotope Science Project(RISP) of IBS has constructed “RAON” accelerator from 2012 to 2021. One of the main beam: 200 MeV/n, 400 kW 238U77+ to 81+. Beam 90° bending section Soil Charge stripper Low energy experiment facility Concrete SCL2 180° bending section Dipole The structural drawing of RISP accelerator ( version) 238U33+, 34+ (17.5 MeV/n) 238U77+ to 81 + (17.5 MeV/n) Carbon stripper (Φ 3 cm, t = 5.0 μm) Dipole magnet Stripping and transport of high-charged 238U ions at RAON Stripping reaction Beam selection
4
Benchmarking data for U beams
O. Yordanov et. GSI, in 2005 : 1 GeV/n U + thick Fe Y. Uwamino RIBF/RIKEN, in 2010 : 345 MeV/n U + thin Be, Pb, thick Fe N. Nakao RIBF/RIKEN in 2014 : 345 MeV/n U + thin Be Experimental data for benchmarking is rare !! ⇒ Energy of U beam is much higher than 17.5 MeV/n U. ⇒ We performed stripper section of RIBF/RIKEN. 4
5
Stripping section at RIBF of RIKEN
238U64+ (50 MeV/n) 238U86 + Stripper Dipole magnet Stripping and transport of high-charged 238U ions at RIBF of RIKEN Stripping reaction Beam selection Experiment Position Faraday Cup (FC-M11) Stripper Neutron area monitor (FC-M04) Stripping reaction of 238U with thin stripper was used for the experiment of secondary high-energy neutron measurement. 5
6
Stripper change 238U64+ (50 MeV/n) 238U86 + Stripper Dipole magnet Stripping and transport of high-charged 238U ions at RIBF of RIKEN Beryllium disk stripper (up to 2014) Graphite disk stripper (since 2015) 15.6 mg/cm2 ⇒ 85 μm 7 mg/cm2 x 2 ea = 14 mg/cm2 ⇒ 70 μm Damage issue (limit : ~ 20 days) 6
7
Experimental conditions & Analysis procedure
1st, in 2014 2nd, in 2015 Beam target Beryllium (t = 85 μm) Graphite (t = 70 μm) Beam 50 MeV/n U-238 Activation samples Bi, Al (Φ 2 cm, t = 2 mm), Co (2.5 x 2.5 x 0.05 cm3) Co (Φ 2 cm, t = 1 mm), Samples position Outside of stripper chamber : 15°, 30°, 45° (Bi, Al, Co) and 90° (Bi, Al) respect to the beam axis : 15°, 30°, 45°, 65.2° and 90° (Bi, Al, Co) respect to the beam axis Irradiation time ~ 23 days 62 hr 30 min (~ 2.6 days) Gamma spectrocopy results Production rate of radionuclide in the samples Neutron energy spectra (By unfolding method, SAND-II) Comparison Calculated production rate of radionuclide by PHITS 2.64 Calculated neutron energy spectra by PHITS 2.64 and FLUKA c 7
8
For Graphite stripper (2015) For Graphite stripper (2015)
Activation sample position For Graphite stripper (2015) U beam For Be stripper (2014) U beam 65.2o 90o 30o 2 1 3 5 6 4 C stripper 45o 15o x U beam U beam 8 sample For Graphite stripper (2015)
9
x Activation sample position (downstream samples) y x U-beam position
Reference point : shifted beam position Co2 Bi2 Al2 Al1 Bi1 Co1 Bi4 Al4 Co4 Co3 Bi3 Al3 Co5 Bi5 Al5 Bi6 Al6 Co6 U-beam position by wire-scanner : x = 0.43 mm, y = mm . d 13° 18° 27° 30° 42° 44° x y Sample d [mm] θ ± Δθ θ_average Co1 28.4 12.0° ± 4.1° 13° (12.8°) Bi1 29.2 12.3° ± 4.1° Al1 33.1 13.9° ± 4.0° Co2 43.9 18.2° ± 3.9° 18° (17.5°) Bi2 42.9 17.8° ± 3.9° Al2 39.6 16.5° ± 3.9° Co3 71.5 28.2° ± 3.3° 27° (27.4°) Bi3 67.0 26.7° ± 3.4° Al3 69.2 27.4° ± 3.4° Co4 74.5 29.2° ± 3.3° 30° (29.9°) Bi4 78.8 30.6° ± 3.2° Al4 76.8 29.9° ± 3.2° Co5 122.9 42.6° ± 2.3° 42° (42.4°) Bi5 120.7 42.1° ± 2.4° Al5 121.7 42.4° ± 2.3° Co6 129.3 44.1° ± 2.2° 44° (44.3°) Bi6 131.5 44.6° ± 2.2° Al6 130.5 44.3° ± 2.2° R=126.3mm R=73mm R=36mm x 2 1 3 5 6 4 C stripper z 9 sample
10
Beam current assumption
Irradiation time : 06 Dec. 18:30 ~ 09 Dec. 9:00 (62 hrs 30 mins) U-beam current assumption : enA = nA (64+) = 1.77 x 1021 pps Before stripper : FC-M04 (Faraday cup), PP-M04 (Beam profile monitor) After dipole magnet : FC-M11 (Faraday cup), PP-H12 (Beam profile monitor) Absolute beam current was measured using the faraday cup(systematic error: 20%). The variation was recorded using beam profile monitor and monitored by neutron area monitor. 10
11
Interested γ - ray [keV]
Interested reaction, gamma and Cross-section Reaction Half-Life Interested γ - ray [keV] 209Bi(n,3n)207Bi 209Bi(n,4n)206Bi 209Bi(n,5n)205Bi 209Bi(n,6n)204Bi 209Bi(n,7n)203Bi 209Bi(n,8n)202Bi 31.55 y 6.243 d 15.31 d 11.22 h 11.76 h 1.72 h 569.7, , 343.5, 516.2, 803.1, 881.0, , 703.5, 987.7, 374.8, 899.2, 984.0 820.2, 825.2, 422.1, 657.5, 960.7 27Al(n,α)24Na 14.96 h 1369.0 59Co(n,2n)58Co 59Co(n,3n)57Co 59Co(n,4n)56Co 59Co(n,5n)55Co 59Co(n,p)59Fe 59Co(n,α)56Mn 70.86 d 271.8 d 77.3 d 17.5 h 44.5 d 2.58 h 811.0 122.1, 136.5 1037.8, , 931.3 1099.3, 846.8, Neutron threshold energy of available Bi reaction is above 20 MeV. To extend the neutron spectra to lower energy region, we used Bi + Al. We used Co for cross-check. Its minimum threshold energy is above 0.3 MeV in case of (n,p) reaction. 11
12
Gamma spectroscopy Spectroscopy system of RIKEN Gamma peak analysis
HPGe detector: CANBERRA GC2019 - Relative efficiency: 20% - FWHM 1.33 MeV : 2.0 keV (from certification sheet) : 2.19 keV (from source measurement) HyperGam software - Developed at Seoul Nat’l Univ. in Korea - Automatic analysis of complex gamma spectrum - Analysis core routine : adopted from HYPERMET 791 keV Bi-204 (3.3%) 803 keV Bi-206 (99%) 816 keV Bi-203 (4%) 820 keV Bi-203 (29.7%) 825 keV Bi-203 (14.6%) 881 keV Bi-206 (66.2%) 12
13
Production rate Production rate, R [sample atom-1 beam ion-1 ], was obtained with the following formula. 𝑅= 𝜆 𝑁 𝑝 𝑁 𝑠 𝛾𝜀 𝑒 −𝜆 𝑡 𝑐 (1− 𝑒 −𝜆 𝑡 𝑚 )( 6.242× 𝑄 ) 𝑞 𝑖 1− 𝑒 −𝜆 𝑡 𝑖 𝑒 −𝜆 𝑡 𝑐 𝜆 : Decay constant of the radionuclides 𝑁 𝑝 : Net area of gamma ray peak 𝑁 𝑠 : Number of atoms in the sample (parent nucleus) 𝛾 : Gamma emission probability 𝜀 : Absolute efficiency of HPGe detector at particular gamma-ray energy (including the self-absorption effect) 𝑡 𝑖 : Irradiation time [sec] 𝑡 𝑐 : Cooling time [sec] 𝑡 𝑚 : Measurement time [sec] 𝑞 𝑖 : Beam current [ampere] 𝑄 : Charge state of ion 13
14
Measured production rates
Production rate of 209Bi(n, 4n)206Bi reaction at 13° angle is most high. When the angle respect to the beam axis is increased, ⇒ Production rates of (n,xn) reaction decreased rapidly than (n,p) or (n,α) reaction. ⇒ The generation of high-energy neutron above 20 MeV decreased more. 14
15
PHITS calculation Conditions of PHITS calculation
Only Be stripper Be stripper + Around geometry PHITS 2.64 Beam: 50 MeV/n 238U (7.92 mm shifted downward) Physics model → Nucleus-Nucleus collisions: JQMD + GEM (above 10 MeV/n up to 100 GeV/n), SPAR (below 10 MeV/n) → Nucleon-induced reaction: INCL4.6 + GEM (from 20 MeV to 3 GeV), INC-ELF → JENDL-4.0 library (below 20 MeV) Geometry: Graphite stripper, samples with around geometry such as chamber, pipes Estimation of particle fluence: [t-track] tally Neutron spectra from thin Be (8.5 μm) w or w/o around geometry, PHITS calculation Production rate calculation 𝑅= 𝐸 𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝐸 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝜎 𝐸 𝜙 𝐸 𝑑𝐸 𝑅 𝐸 𝑡ℎ𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝐸 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝜎 𝐸 𝜙 𝐸 : Production rate [#/sample atom/238U] : Threshold energy of reaction : Maximum energy of reaction : Neutron cross section of radionuclides [10-24 cm2] : Neutron fluence [n/cm2/238U] JENDL-4 (below 20 MeV) JENDL-HE 2007 (above 20 MeV) [t-track] tally PHITS 15
16
Comparison of experiment & PHITS calculation (production rates)
Production rate from PHITS calculation overestimated experimental results at lower angles. : ~ 4 times higher (maximum) In case of samples which was installed at the side of the stripper chamber such as 65.2o and 90o, PHITS results were similar with experimental results. 16
17
Secondary neutron spectrum
17
18
Secondary neutron spectrum
Below 45 degree chamber downstream) : PHITS > FLUKA ≥ EXPERIMENT Above 45 degree chamber sideward) : PHITS ≒ EXPERIMENT ≥ FLUKA 18
19
Beryllium stripper vs. Graphite stripper
Beryllium disk stripper (t = 85 μm) Graphite disk stripper (t = 70 μm) Beryllium stripper generates more secondary neutrons than Graphite stripper because of thickness difference. The shape of secondary neutron spectra is almost same between two cases. 19
20
Summary Neutron production from thin graphite by 50 MeV/n 238U beam was observed successfully by activation analysis with several elements which have threshold reaction cross-section with high energy neutrons. Production yields of radionuclides in the activation samples induced from each nuclear reaction were measured using the nuclear reactions of 209Bi(n,xn)210-xBi (x=4~8), 59Co(n,xn)60-xCo (x=2~5), 59Co(n,p)59Fe, 59Co(n, α)56Mn, 27Al(n, α)24Na. Neutron spectra were obtained from measured production rates by unfolding with SAND-II code. Experimental results were compared with calculation data by PHITS and FLUKA code. Some discrepancies between the calculations data and experimental results were found but might be acceptable. These results can compensate lacks of experimental data which are needed for benchmarking study. 20
21
Thank you for your attention !!
Summary More MC comparison data will be introduced soon such as production rate using FLUKA, production rate and neutron energy spectrum using MARS15 and MCNPX. Thank you for your attention !! 21
22
PHITS-2.64 vs. PHITS-2.82 Beryllium disk stripper (t = 8.5 μm, 1/10 thickness of real stripper) 22
23
Absolute efficiency of spectroscopy system
Mixed standard source (point source) Non irradiated Bi 1. 3. Experimental setup for gamma ray point source above the non-irradiated Bi 2. Absolute efficiency of HPGe detector, considering the self-absorption effect in the comparatively thick activation detectors cm from detector head) 1. Gamma ray point source only 2. Gamma ray point source above the non irradiated activation sample 3. Volume source Schematic drawing of 3 types system of gamma ray detection for absolute efficiency of HPGe detector using MCNPX code (F8 tally) → Reproduce experimental data within 10% 23
24
Production rate from each gamma-peak
24
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.