1. Are innovation platforms relevant policy instrument to co-design farming systems minimizing trade-offs between ecosystem services for a climate-smart agriculture? 
Andrieu, Howland, Osorio, Trimino, Duron, Paz, Loboguerrero, Ortega, Martinez Baron, Bonilla, Gallardo, Chia

2. Co-design Innovations
Food security
Mitigation
Adaptation
Synergies and trade-offs
Climate variability
Climate change
Co-design Innovations
Transformational adaptation
Incremental adaptation

3. The socio-technical nature of innovation= innovation platforms ?
Sharing knowledge on a comon problem
Identifying opportunities
Defining beyond the farm scale original technical and organizational solutions to solve a problem
Very few experiences of Innovation platforms dedicated to meanstream climate smart agriculture (Gian et al., 2013, Chettri et al., 2012, Cooper and Wheeler, 2015, Cordero et al. 2014)

4. Granos Básicos – Café - Yuca - Ganadería
Methodology
Priorisation of tecnical and organizational changes
Ex-ante assessment of changes and capacity building
Colombia
Granos Básicos – Café - Yuca - Ganadería
Honduras
Existing innovation platform
Analisis of changes between the beginning and the end of the project
On-farm experiment

5. The CCAFS site example in ColombiaPI
Hogares
CCFAS
Inst. Educ. Las Mercedes
Fund. Ecohábitats
J.A.C
n= 30 farmers
Adaptation plans
Methodology

6. Follow-up of the IP PI October 2015 September 2016 Adaptation plans
Hogares
CCFAS
Inst. Educ. Las Mercedes
Fund. Ecohábitats
J.A.C
Surveys at the beginning and the end
Process indicators
Surveys at the beginning and the end
+ workshops
Indicators on knowledge
Adaptation plans
CSA indicators at the farm level
Practices
Methodology

7. Preliminary results: Process indicators

8. Preliminary results: Indicators on knowledge
¿Cómo cree que el clima del 2030 afectara su finca?

9. Preliminary results: CSA indicators at the farm level
S1: Baseline
3 scenarios co-defined with farmers
S2: farm with two CSA practices
S3: farm with portfolio of CSA practices and other changes at the farm level
Synergies can be found !

10. Conclusions
Provisioning and regulating services are key for the adaptation and mitigation efficiency of practices
For the prioritized CSA practices mitigation was not an objective but rather a co-benefit.
Innovation platforms can be relevant instruments to operationalize the CSA concept and use of ecosystem services
To address challenges at the territory level for the use of ecosystem services (water…) caused by technical changes at the farm level
The facilitator is the key of the success otherwise failure !!!!
Climate-smart farming systems rely on individual and collective innovation, technical and organizational innovation
Excel was an interesting discussion tool to assess with farmers the trade-offs and synergies between food security, income, and other indicators of adaptation and mitigation such as the efficient use of water, efficient use of fertilizers, and CO2 emissions.
Life cycle analysis will permit to improve the analysis of the link between use of CSA practices at the farm level and use of ecosystem services at territory level