Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Word meaning Word meaning changes over time
In King James Bible by and by means immediately
2
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Are our own concepts of time, space, and matter given in substantially the same form by experience to all men, or are they in part conditioned by the structure of particular languages?
3
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Are our own concepts of time, space, and matter given in substantially the same form by experience to all men, or are they in part conditioned by the structure of particular languages? Are there traceable affinities between (a) cultural and behavioral norms and (b) large- scale linguistic patterns?
4
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
We dissect nature along lines laid down by our native languages. The categories and types that we isolate from the world of phenomena we do not find there because they stare every observer in the face; on the contrary, the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to be organized by our minds—and this means largely by the linguistic systems in our minds. We cut nature up, organize it into concepts, and ascribe significances as we do, largely because we are parties to an agreement to organize it in this way — an agreement that holds throughout our speech community and is codified in the patterns of our language... all observers are not led by the same physical evidence to the same picture of the universe, unless their linguistic backgrounds are similar, or can in some way be calibrated.
5
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
The structure of one’s language influences the manner in which one perceives and understands the world, therefore, speakers of different languages will perceive the world differently.
6
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Strong version Language determines certain non-linguistic cognitive processes, that is, language determines our perception of the world.
7
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Strong version Language determines certain non-linguistic cognitive processes, that is, language determines our perception of the world. Weak version Language biases our view of the world.
8
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Strong version Reality is imposed by one's language so you can alter someone's thoughts by altering his/her language Is that even possible? Do totalitarian governments ban words?
9
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Strong version Reality is imposed by one's language so you can alter someone's thoughts by altering his/her language Is that even possible? Do totalitarian governments ban words? Linguistic categories create cognitive categories
10
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
I am hot I have heat
11
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
I am hot I have heat I have two daisies There are two daisies to me
12
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
I am hot I have heat I have two daisies There are two daisies to me We went (past tense) to the store We go (past meaning, no past tense) to the store
13
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
I am leaving (marked with iterative aspect) I am leaving (marked with future aspect)
14
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Does language affect how we perceive colors? How would you divide the spectrum up?
15
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
English Berimno
16
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
People who don't have different words for blue and green can't distinguish them
17
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Strong version Reality is imposed by one's language so you can alter someone's thoughts by altering his/her language
18
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Chinese numbers for eleven and twelve = 10+1, 10+2, etc. English numbers = separate words (eleven, twelve, etc) Chinese-speaking children learn to count and understand numbers in the teen range better than English-speaking children
19
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Verbs can contain information about movement path manner ground figure The ball rolled down the road manner=roll path=down the road ground=road figure=ball
20
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Verbs can contain information about movement path manner ground figure The ball rolled down the road manner=roll path=down the road ground=road figure=ball English verbs contain manner, not path
21
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
English verbs encode manner not path French verbs encode path, not manner English figure manner path ground She cycled over the bridge The bird flew out of its cage Elle a traverse la Manche a velo she crossed the Channel by plane
22
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Other examples Drudge = marcher péniblement (walk tediously) March = marcher au pas (walk stepping) Plod = marcher d’un pas lent (walk with a slow step) Saunter = marcher d’un pas nonchalant (walk with a nonchalant step)
23
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
In some experiment
24
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Languages with gender all objects animate and inanimate have gender English and Spanish kids asked to group objects into two 33% of Spanish kids did it by gender
25
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Languages with gender all objects animate and inanimate have gender English and Spanish kids asked to group objects into two 33% of Spanish kids did it by gender Should this have a man's or woman's voice Spanish did it by gender English had no pattern
26
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
Languages with gender all objects animate and inanimate have gender English and Spanish kids asked to group objects into two 33% of Spanish kids did it by gender Should this have a man's or woman's voice Spanish did it by gender English had no pattern Kids with gender language recognize gender of other kids faster than kids with no gender in language
27
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
German English bilinguals Spanish English bilinguals Key is feminine in Spanish and masculine in German Bridge is masculine in Spanish and feminine in German
28
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
German English bilinguals Spanish English bilinguals Key is feminine in Spanish and masculine in German Bridge is masculine in Spanish and feminine in German Describe key German: hard, heavy, jagged Spanish: light, shiny, little
29
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
German English bilinguals Spanish English bilinguals Key is feminine in Spanish and masculine in German Bridge is masculine in Spanish and feminine in German Describe bridge German: beautiful, elegant, peaceful, slender Spanish: big, dangerous, strong, sturdy
30
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
31
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
32
Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
English: put on versus put in Korean: interlock things versus put loosely in container They asked kids to describe what was being done (buttoning, joining, separating, inserting, attaching, hanging, dressing things) Korean kids classified things as interlocking and tightly fitting by using same words to describe them. Same words not used for “in and on” English kids the opposite
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.