Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Standard 3: Clinical Practice
1 Site Evaluation 2 Diversity Data 3 Partnership Schools 4 Candidate Evaluation 5 Impact on Student Learning
2
Site Evaluation Field sites were evaluated for whether they provided
Model environment Opportunities to develop professional K, S, D Caring learning community For all 5 semesters, from fall 2008-fall 2010, ratings of sites found to be at acceptable or target levels ranged from 93% to 100%. Very few respondents (n=21) said they would not recommend the site again.
3
Diversity Data An IQV of 0f to 32.9% was considered low
% % An IQV of 33 to 65.9% considered medium % % An IQV of 66 to 100% considered high % %
4
Partnership Schools There have been ongoing partnerships between QC-CUNY and the NYC Department of Education, with Memoranda of Understanding on file for the following schools: Louis Armstrong Middle School Townsend Harris PS/IS Queens School of Teaching John Bowne Queens School of Inquiry PS 201
5
Candidate Evaluation Three 32-item forms completed by Candidates
Cooperating Teachers College Supervisors Items Measuring Equity (9 items) Excellence (12 items Ethics (11 items)
6
Candidate Evaluation: % of Ratings at Acceptable or Target Level
Undergraduate Initial Year Range of n Range of Means Range of S.D to to to to to to 0.58 Graduate Initial to to to to to to 0.53
7
Candidate Evaluation: % of Ratings at Acceptable or Target Level
Advanced Graduate Year Range of n Range of Means Range of S.D to to to to to to 0.46 Advanced Grad Other School Professionals to to to to to 0.46
8
Impact on Student Learning
Items refer to: using appropriate strategies linking assessment to instruction reporting information to stakeholders candidate self-refection evaluation of student progress Our candidates’ impact in each area was most frequently rated as “target.”
9
Impact: % of Ratings at Acceptable or Target Level for 5 Items
Undergraduate Initial (n=251) 91% to 94% (n=317) 89% to 94% Graduate Initial (n=266) 81% to 92% (n=364) 92% to 94% Advanced Graduate (n=23) 70% (n=0) Advanced Graduate-Other School Professionals (n= 0) (n=14) 100%
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.