Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMervyn Hardy Modified over 7 years ago
1
AN EXPLORATORY CASE STUDY ON CREATING A COLLABORATIVE AND EFFICIENT VIRTUAL COMMAND CENTER AMONG FOUR SEPARATE ORGANIZATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES ARMY Ms. Teresa Gonda, Master Black Belt Senior Service College Fellow Defense Acquisition University Anne Kohnke, PhD Assistant Professor of IT Lawrence Technological University College of Management
2
Midwest Academy of Management 2012
OUTLINE Introduction Literature Review Methodology Results Discussion Conclusion Midwest Academy of Management 2012
3
Introduction The Context
DoD and Army in a major transformation to become more efficient Creation of Virtual Integrated Command Centers (2004) Army Wide Process Improvement Implementation (2006) Leadership Programs to teach new thinking (2006) New Integrated IT Business Systems across Army/DoD (2011) Better Business Initiatives (DoD) (2011) Seven year case study Master’s Thesis Part of an ongoing longitudinal study/Participant Action Research – Formative Evaluation Research The Beginning of the Journey: What to do with a clean sheet of paper? (or not so clean…) Midwest Academy of Management 2012
4
Introduction The Problem
The DoD Acquisition Executive Goals Acquisition is the Business side of DoD Acquiring or building “stuff” for military Affordable Programs Improve Efficiency Civilian Military Army Acquisition Executive Army Materiel Command GENERAL (4 star General) Two Separate Chains of Command in Army Program Executives (PEO) Program Managers (PM) Control $/ Programs PEO PM Prod Separate Powers Research, Development, Engineering Sustainment, Logistics, Costing Control Requirements (& Program Support) Midwest Academy of Management 2012
5
Introduction The Change
Operate as One Collaborative Business The Life Cycle Management Command (LCMC) A Virtual Command Center Unit of Analysis ( ) LCMC Intervention Projects • Human Resources Financial Synchronization Fleet Rde RDE Alignment LCMC Block Project-Lean Six Sigma Create LCMC Tech Portfolio Planning Align PM and Research Community to collaboratively work tech planning and insertion Create an LCMC shared systems engineering and integration center of excellence to be utilized across PMs/PEOs The Intervention LCMC Initiative • Get products to the Soldier faster Make good products even better Minimize life cycle cost Enhance the synergy and effectiveness of the separate orgs Lean Six Sigma Directed Midwest Academy of Management 2012
6
Midwest Academy of Management 2012
LIT REVIEW Implementing Change Lean Six Sigma for Enterprise Excellence* Frigon, N. L., & Jackson, H. K. (2008). Enterprise Excellence: A Practical Guide to World Class Competition. George, M. (2003). Lean Six Sigma for Service Change Models and Variety Kotter (1996) , Leading Change Change Communication The importance of leadership in change Organizational Design Labovitz, G., & Rosansky, V. (1997). The Power of Alignment: How Great Companies Stay Centered and Accomplish Extraordinary Things. McKinsey 7-S, Waterman, Peters, & Phillips, 1980 *Relevant in this phase of the effort Midwest Academy of Management 2012
7
Midwest Academy of Management 2012
METHODOLOGY Participants LCMC Executive Committee The RDE Alignment Executive Steering Group The Action Research Team The Core Team Subject Matter Experts Analytical Framework – COVERED MORE in RESULTS Frigon & George: Lean Six Sigma DMAIC - Modified toward Design for Lean Six Sigma (create something new) Structured Interviews – process adapted from Lean Six Sigma Thematic Analysis – Three Person Interrater reliability Content Analysis (for Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) Constant Comparative Analysis (interviews, FMEA, best practices, process mapping) Mixed Method Qualitative & Quantitative Intervention Exercises Midwest Academy of Management 2012
8
METHODOLOGY Failure Modes & Effects Analysis (FMEA) Template
Midwest Academy of Management 2012
9
Midwest Academy of Management 2012
RESULTS DEFINE PHASE MEASURE PHASE ANALYZE PHASE IMPROVE PHASE CONTROL PHASE Midwest Academy of Management 2012
10
RESULTS DEFINE PHASE AFFINITY DIAGRAM/INTERRELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM/SCORING MATRIX 8 and 15 participants – Key stakeholders in the processes across the orgs. RESEARCH BEST PRACTICES STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS – Voice of the Customer, SCOPING, REFINING Interdependency diagraph of problems from Affinity Pareto chart Pareto chart for Affinity process RESULT: Refinement of problem towards need for collaborative Portfolio Management. CHALLENGE: No Pfm infrastructure, no integrative processes, proper skills, tools in place. Would have to build from scratch and create the culture Midwest Academy of Management 2012
11
Midwest Academy of Management 2012
RESULTS MEASURE PHASE PROCESS MAPPING BEST PRACTICES Additional Voice of the Customer Midwest Academy of Management 2012
12
Midwest Academy of Management 2012
RESULTS ANALYZE PHASE CAUSE & EFFECT FISHBONE Failure Modes & Effects Analysis THEMATIC ANALYSIS Constant Comparative Analysis interviews, FMEA, best practices, process mapping % Cumulative Risk 29% - Unclear Roles and Resp 17% - No Formal Process 13% -No Strategy accounted 11% - Incorrect Skills 11% - Lack of Collaboration 7%- Lack of Coordinated Users 4% - Funding problems 4% Poor Communication 3% - Org Structure Problems Midwest Academy of Management 2012
13
Midwest Academy of Management 2012
RESULTS IMPROVE PHASE BEST PRACTICES FUTURE STATE PROCESS MAPPING, RACI MAPPING SYNTHESIZE Constant Comparative Analysis (interviews, FMEA, best practices, process mapping) The RDE Alignment Solution Set based on the Labovitz and Rosanksy Alignment Model Synthesis Resulted in a Blue Print for: Overarching collaborative synchronized planning process A central planning function (new roles) to manage the process A center of excellence for systems engineering and integration The governance structure to bring the pieces together since the virtual Command Center had no other means of centralized decision making Midwest Academy of Management 2012
14
Midwest Academy of Management 2012
RESULTS CONTROL PHASE Developed an Implementation Plan of projects that needed to be launched to build blueprint Assigned Champion Senior Executive Established a Strategic Transformation Cell to drive and facilitate Established an Improvement Project Management Infrastructure Developed a Strategic Plan based on the blueprint Midwest Academy of Management 2012
15
DISCUSSION KEY LESSONS LEARNED
LSS was directed Implementation poor overall. Not understood. Little outside help. The outside mentoring I got and being full time, made the difference Mentoring approach built into LSS good for developing change agents Tools very good for guiding qualitative analysis Fishbone/FMEA combo is powerful tedious, but calibrates a group and gives very rich data DMAIC Framework adaptable given the right personality ODC Communication Per Kotter et al, it is crucial and there wasn’t nearly enough of it This was big departure. Major Comms strategy called for to implement change Leadership Army knows fighting leadership, but hasn’t built the business framework yet and just assumes that “leadership” is the problem. But leading change and building a “business” is not understand. Midwest Academy of Management 2012
16
DISCUSSION CHALLENGES
Lean Six Sigma is for fixing, not creating Could have used Design for LSS, but not part of culture Would have started with Appreciative Inquiry Scope, Scope, Scope Leading Change While Kotter book was read, leaders still underestimate what communication is needed and that strat comms requires a diligent continuous system Midwest Academy of Management 2012
17
Midwest Academy of Management 2012
CONCLUSION Study Demonstrated Even amidst significant challenges, Effective employing and adapting elements of Lean Six Sigma change philosophies, structures, and tools Can be used to guide dedicated Action Research Teams in creating a new vision A Tailored Quality Management System Blueprint Strategic plan and implementation plan For establishing a collaborative and efficient virtual business organization and Command Center Midwest Academy of Management 2012
18
CONCLUSION RECOMMENDATIONS
Research aligns with Frigon & Jackson, George and Kotter that Care must be taken to properly scope interventions Wholesale and continuous effective communication is required throughout the entire intervention Change requires committed and engaged Senior Leader with knowledgable and dedicated change agents Midwest Academy of Management 2012
19
Midwest Academy of Management 2012
FINAL NOTE The results of this study helped four separate organizations within the United States Army to identify several issues and implement the structural changes and new processes that they believe were required in order for this transformation to a virtual business organization to succeed. Midwest Academy of Management 2012
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.