1. C A D I C Campus Alcohol and Drug Information Center
After Action Report
2016

2. Campus Alcohol and Drug Information Center
AAR of 6
OVERVIEW
Issue One: Cadet Binge Drinking
Issue Two: Cadet Tobacco Use
Issue Three: 2015 AOD Data Collection
Issue Four: One-on-One Intervention (& Referral)
Campus Alcohol and Drug Information Center
C A D I C

3. Campus Alcohol and Drug Information Center
AAR of 6
ISSUE ONE: Cadet Binge Drinking
DISCUSSION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Use data to develop a social norm campaign – focus on “healthy majority”
Continue current process of referrals, collaborations and interventions
Increase targeted prevention/intervention programs (see Issue 4)
Continue to collect annual data
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS
Continued progress
Biased data (see Issue 3)
Social norm campaign
Reversal of progress
Meet G1 & G2
Reinforce message
Change in norms
Now 7% below NA
Facilitates discussion
Health & safety
Collective effort
Team Paluso
<Graph>
Campus Alcohol and Drug Information Center
C A D I C

4. Campus Alcohol and Drug Information Center
AAR of 6
ISSUE TWO: Cadet Tobacco Use
DISCUSSION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Focus on new tobacco policy; reinforce guidelines
Link tobacco cessation efforts with Citadel’s physical pillar
TAC referrals to CADIC—BEFORE TPV
Collect data on tobacco use, cessation efforts, referrals and violations
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS
N/A
2% increase from 2015
Tobacco education & cessation efforts
Health risks (delayed)
<Graph>
Now ~ 22% higher than National average
Market & reinforce new policy
Violation of new policy and subsequent discipline
Reinforce cessation
Creation of new norms
Reinforce health via physical pillar
Stimulant replacement
Campus Alcohol and Drug Information Center
C A D I C

5. Campus Alcohol and Drug Information Center
AAR of 6
ISSUE THREE: 2015 AOD Data Collection
DISCUSSION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Two-week data collection timeline – first two weeks of November
Include APA-type informed consent
Include a social desirability response measure
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS
Good response rate
Introduction of artifact – possible questionable generalization
Ensure data collection occurs with no holiday interruption
Data collection occurs pre/post holiday again
Good sample size
Self-report – questionable due to fear of anonymity breach
Ensure all cadets experience the same testing experience (relative)
Low response rate
Self-Report – social desirability bias
Informed consent
Fear of breached anonymity
Answering in socially desirable ways
Campus Alcohol and Drug Information Center
C A D I C

6. Campus Alcohol and Drug Information Center
AAR of 6
ISSUE FOUR: One-on-One Intervention
DISCUSSION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Continue current referral process both to CADIC and post assessment
Initiate 1-month and 3-month follow-up to assess stability of behavior change
Hire part-time graduate student (cadet?) to facilitate targeted group interventions
STRENGTHS
WEAKNESSES
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS
Is a best practice
Time consuming
1-month & 3-month follow-up
Self-report bias – missed actual SUD
Allows multi referrals
<CHART>
Inhibits targeted group interventions
Online instrumentation
Involves all units within Commandant’s Dept.
Campus Alcohol and Drug Information Center
C A D I C