Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

University of Virginia 2009 NHTS Survey Results

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "University of Virginia 2009 NHTS Survey Results"— Presentation transcript:

1 University of Virginia 2009 NHTS Survey Results
Center for Survey Research Team: Thomas M. Guterbock, Director Jim Ellis, Director of Research Deborah Rexrode, Research Analyst Kien Le, Research Analyst Presented to VDOT February 23, 2010

2 Protocol Advance Postcard
Survey packet (cover letter, travel diary and $3 incentive) notice, reminder, telephone reminder Rescheduled travel date 14 days after original travel date notice, reminder for rescheduled travel date Travel days: Monday Sep. 14 – Sunday Oct. 11, 2009 Rescheduled days: Monday Sep. 28 – Sunday Oct. 25, 2009 Closeout November 4, 2009 Data collection closed: November 10, 2009 Thanks to Susan Willis-Walton at Virginia Tech for programming and hosting the UVA survey 2 2

3 Sample Six strata of students:
Students with listed address outside of Virginia All students on-Grounds (almost all undergrad) Undergraduate students off-Grounds but near Graduate students off-Grounds but near Undergraduate students off-Grounds but far Graduate students off-Grounds but far 3

4 Response Rate Targeted response rate of 40%
Crude response rate of 40.1% (1003/2500) Final response rate of 41.7% (1003/2407) 4

5 Process issues UVA no longer uses postal service for official communication with students, therefore mailings suffered from undeliverable addresses. A total of 205 students reported only one trip, but most of these students completed the back end of the survey. This occurred even when the students started the travel day at home. This indicated a potential problem with reporting or recording data. We developed a protocol with other members of the research team to differentiate 23 that legitimately had only one trip from the 182 that were deemed incomplete. We excluded the incomplete cases from the trip-level analyses but retained them in the respondent-level analyses. 5

6 Student Respondent Profile

7 Demographics Variable Survey Data UVA Population Male/Female 38%/62%
44%/56% Age (Average) 23.0 -- Race (White, Black, Other) 72%/5%/23% 62%/7%/31% Undergraduate/Graduate 61%/39% 64%/36% Live off Grounds 65% 78%* Married 13% Professional Students 19% 24% *University records do not maintain current local addresses so this number varies. 7

8 If “Yes”: Type of University Housing
Student Residence Live in University Housing Live in Charlottesville Year Round If “Yes”: Type of University Housing Residence Hall – 84.9% Family Living, Apt – 13.2% Other – 1.9% 8

9 Living Situation N Percent Living alone 158 16% Living w roommates 682
69% Living w family members 71 7% Living w someone else as a couple 102 10% Note: Respondents could select more than one choice. 9

10 Working Situation Currently employed? Hours Worked Per Week

11 Income

12 Survey Results

13 Driver’s License and Vehicles
Vehicle Available for Use 13

14 Typical Commute to the University

15 Commuting Distance and Time
Commuting Distance (Miles) N Min Max Mean Median S.D. 918 300 4.88 1.00 20.1 Commuting Time (Minutes) N Min Max Mean Median S.D. 979 300 15.18 10.00 21.2 15

16 Number of Trips N Min Max Mean Median S.D. 3802 15 4.67 4.00 3.09

17 Trip Mode Living on grounds Living off grounds 17

18 Trip Purpose

19 Trip Departure/Arrival Time

20 Trip Type NHB: Non home based HBU: Home based University
HBW: Home based Work HBO: Home based Others

21 Trip Duration by Type 21

22 Information Usage How often do you seek information about traffic and general travel conditions in your area?

23 Source of Information Top three sources of information about traffic and general travel conditions in the area 94.9% use the internet 19.3% find information on television 13.9% listen to the radio Effect of this information 62.7% change time of departure 51.3% change route of travel 46.2% change means of transportation

24 Summary The production protocol performed as expected.
The respondents represent the UVA student population fairly well. The data provide a reliable source for expanding TDM to include university students. Geocoding of destinations is in progress. As expected, UVA students differ from the general population in demographics, mode choice and trip type. Valuable lessons were learned to apply to future surveys of this type.

25 For more information Contact:
Thomas M. Guterbock, Director UVA Center for Survey Research Jim Ellis, Director of Research Deborah Rexrode, Research Analyst Kien Le, Research Analyst


Download ppt "University of Virginia 2009 NHTS Survey Results"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google