Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

DoD Support to Search and Rescue

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "DoD Support to Search and Rescue"— Presentation transcript:

1 DoD Support to Search and Rescue
UNCLASSIFIED DoD Support to Search and Rescue …And the Dual Status Commander Patrick Merrigan USNORTHCOM/J36 January 25, 2017

2 “Fair is fair Larry… We’re out of food, we drew straws – you lost.”
Topics of Discussion USNORTHCOM Overview Title 10 Support to Dual-Status Commander-led JTFs DSC Case Study – Colorado Floods Best Practices Q & A “Fair is fair Larry… We’re out of food, we drew straws – you lost.”

3 United States Northern Command

4 NORAD-NORTHCOM Mission Sets
UNCLASSIFIED NORAD-NORTHCOM Mission Sets NORAD Aerospace Warning Aerospace Control Maritime Warning USNORTHCOM Homeland Defense Civil Support Security Cooperation Trusted Partnerships are our Center of Gravity Here are the NORAD and USNORTHCOM assigned mission sets…which span from a traditional homeland defense role…to helping others in their time of need. The North American Aerospace Defense Command is a bi-national command with the U.S. and Canada, and was established in The NORAD Agreement is a formal military partnership, based upon a binding international agreement. NORAD conducts aerospace warning and control and maritime warning in the defense of North America. United States Northern Command, or “USNORTHCOM,” was established in 2002 as a result of the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, USNORTHCOM partners to conduct homeland defense, civil support and security cooperation to defend and secure the United States and its interests. These are complementary missions. In the homelands, the two commands’ partners are critical…in fact, they are the commands’ center of gravity. While the missions are different, teamwork, partnerships, and unity of effort are universally critical to all the missions. TRANSITION: Due to the unique nature of the laws, policies and guidance that affect the conduct of NORAD and USNORTHCOM’s missions in the homelands, it is critical that we partner with agencies at the Federal, State, Local and Tribal level that are in the lead in response to an event, in most cases. (SLIDE) UNCLASSIFIED

5 NC Area of Responsibility

6 …saving lives, preventing human suffering, mitigate property damage…
Our Commander’s View… Mission: When directed, USNORTHCOM conducts Defense Support of Civil Authorities within its AOR when requested by a Primary Agency and in response to National Special Security Events, actual or potential natural or man-made disasters or catastrophic incidents or other emergencies Commander’s Intent: We will assure our partners that Title 10 forces are in a supporting role, and will achieve unity of effort in saving lives, preventing human suffering, and mitigating great property damage. Objectives: Deploy and Employ Forces Save lives Prevent suffering Minimize great property damage Establish C3 and information networks Maintain public confidence End State: USNORTHCOM support to federal, state, local and tribal civil partners is complete, response efforts have transitioned to primary agencies, and the force is postured to respond to future events. GEN Lori Robinson Commander, N-NC …saving lives, preventing human suffering, mitigate property damage… 4

7 Title 10 Support to Dual-Status Commander-led Joint Task Forces (JTF)

8 Who is a DSC? Dual Status Commander is a properly trained US Army or US Air Force officer-of-the-line (Colonel or General Officer) who has been given the authority to exercise command over assigned Title 10 (Active Duty) and National Guard forces Nominated by the Governor and approved by SECDEF Trained by USNORTHCOM and NGB Activated by a request from the Governor

9 Why employ a DSC? Joint Action Plan for Developing Unity of Effort
(Approved by Council of Governors, Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland Security on March 1, 2011) When a State requests support from the Federal government, it is vital to acknowledge both the sovereign status of Governors in managing and directing the response to emergencies within their States…and the responsibility of the President and Secretary of Defense in ensuring legal, safe, and effective employment of Federal forces when requested NDAA FY12 (Public Law : December 31, 2011) When the Armed Forces and the National Guard are employed simultaneously in support of civil authorities in the United States…a dual-status commander…should be the usual and customary command and control arrangement, including for missions involving a major disaster or emergency When a major disaster or emergency occurs…the Governor of the State affected normally will be the principle civil authority supported by the primary Federal agency and its supporting Federal entities, and the Adjutant General of the State…normally will be the principle military authority supported by the dual-status commander USSS has the primary responsibility for security design, planning and implementation (National Special Security Events) FBI has the primary responsibility for intelligence, counterterrorism and federal criminal investigation (Crisis Management) FEMA has the primary responsibility for emergency response, recovery planning and coordination (Consequence Management) DoDD (Jan 5, 2011) Enclosure 4 (Responsibilities): State Adjutant Generals “Designate a qualified officer or officers eligible to serve in dual status pursuant to section 325(a)(2) of (Title 32 US Code). When a dual status relationship is authorized, ensure dual status officers facilitate unity of effort between State and Federal military forces in accordance with guidance from both their respective Governors and the President, or their designees. So why do we do DSC? It all started with the Council of Governors. The Joint Action Plan for developing Unity of Effort recognizes state sovereignty and the Council of Governors, SECDEF and DHS all approved this in March 2011. Then in December 2011, it became Federal law; DSC is the Usual and Customary C2 arrangement.

10 Title 10 Mission Command Options
Parallel DSC President Governor President Governor SECDEF SECDEF TAG NORTHCOM NORTHCOM TAG T10 Forces NG Forces Dual Status Commander T10 Deputy NG Deputy Title 10 Staff State NG T10 Forces NG Forces

11 Typical DSC Staff Configuration
Command Group Special Staff (JA, SRG, PAO, etc) Special Staff (JA, SRG, PAO, etc) DSC T10 Deputy NG Deputy T10 COS NG COS JOC J3 J1 J1 J2 J2 CUOPS FUOPS J3 J3 DSC Joint Enabling Capability (JEC) J4 JPG/FOC J5 J4 J5 J5 JSG J1/4/6 NG Staff C2 T10 Staff C2 Coord J6 J6 Collaborating to achieve UNITY OF EFFORT

12 NC/J36 Joint Enabling Capability (JEC)
Phase 0 Shape Phase I Anticipate Phase II Respond Phase III Operate Phase IV Stabilize Phase V Transition JTFJEC 17 Personnel 1 x T10D 2 x Future Operations (FuOps) Planners 2 x Current Operations (CuOps) Planners 1 X SEARCH AND RESCUE (SAR) PLANNER 1 x Information Mgmt/Knowledge Mgmt (IM/KM) Planner 1 x Personnel Planner 1 x Intelligence Planners 2 x Logistics Planner 1 x Public Affairs Officer 1 x Medical Planner 1 x Engineer Planner 2 x Communications Planners 1 x Legal Advisor Manning based on supported JTF’s requirements Deploys when requested under NORTHCOM authority Redeployment based on agreement between JFHQ-State and NORTHCOM JEC Core 3-4 Personnel 1 x T10D 2-3 JEC Planners -Deploys when requested under NORTHCOM authority -Sizing/scoping DSC-JEC JEC Core In Phase 0,:we do training, education, exercises, build relationships, and trade business cards. In Phase I:at the request of your DSC or TAG or J3, we send you rT-10 Deputy and a small team (think ADVON) JEC Core. In Phases II-IV: your JEC grows to meet the DSC’s requirements and we help you manage those T-10 forces and the T-10 “isms”. In Phase V: We figure out how to get of your way. It’s important to note that your state NG phases will likely not mirror exactly the T-10 phases. You may send us home days or weeks before the last Guardsman de-mobs. Title 10 Deputy responsibilities include: Conduct familiarization visits with assigned states, coordinate training & exercises Establish working relationships with the DCO/DCE to facilitate DSC-Led JTF operations Support DSC by coordinating with NC/J36 for JEC support Scale the JEC as required for the response Inform NC/J3 and NORAD-NORTHCOM/National Guard office of state training events as they are scheduled Identify excess T10 capacity within the JTF for re-missioning with future/amended MAs Support, if required, the DCO in the C2 of T10 forces prior to the request for DSC activation Coordinate Joint Airspace Command and Control Element (JACCE) support with the DSC. Requested by the JFHQ-State through T10D Deploys under NORTHCOM Commander’s authority Provides T10 civil support subject matter experts to the DSC and DSC staff Normally comprised of 1 x T10D and 16 personnel: 2 x Future Operations (FUOPS) Planners 2 x Current Operations (CUOPS) Planners 1 x Search and Rescue (SAR) Planner 1 x Information Mgmt/Knowledge Mgmt (M/KM) Planner 1 x Personnel Planner 1 x Intelligence Planners 2 x Logistics Planner 1 x Public Affairs Officer 1 x Medical Planner x Engineer Planner 2 x Communications Planners 1 x Legal Advisor TRANSITION: The Core team that works with the T-10 Deputy to support the DSC is called the DSC-JEC Core. When a situation requires a larger response to integrate with T32 staff for a domestic response, the DSC JEC core will expand to a DSC JEC; the NC/J36 bench can support across a wide variety of skill sets, which can bring the following capabilities or skill sets for a DSC JEC. (SLIDE) JEC POC -Build relationships -Conduct coordination -Exercise

13 DSC Establishment and Early Termination (or Extension)
DSC Establishment Steering Group DSC JFHQ J3 T32 Deputy (T10 Deputy) Recommends DSC JTF and DSC Officer to Recommends establishment to Issues letter of consent to Issues authorization memorandum TAG GOV SECDEF Notifies NC Coordinates/ preparesT10 Orders Notifies NGB Issues letter of termination / extension to Recommends early termination / extension to TAG GOV SECDEF Issues memorandum to terminate early / extend NC Terminates / extends T10 orders Disestablishment Steering Group DSC JFHQ J3 T32 Deputy T10 Deputy Recommends early termination/extension to Intermediate CDR DSC Establishment: 1. DSC Establishment Steering Group recommends DSC establishment to the TAG. 2. TAG recommends qualified Title 32 DSC and alternate to Governor. 3. TAG provides recommendation to Chief, NGB and CDRUSNORTHCOM for vetting. Requests for DSC appointment are coordinated through the following organizations: NGB J35 Future Operations Division at NGB J35X Deliberate Planning Branch at NORAD-USNORTHCOM Command Center (N2C2) Current Operations at and USNORTHCOM/J36 at 4. Governor requests approval for DSC from POTUS (delegated to SecDef under Obama). Under unique circumstances, when time does not allow for the Governor to submit a written letter of consent, the Governor may verbally submit consent for DSC via a phone call to the SecDef; however, the required paperwork must be submitted to the SecDef via or fax the letter to Assistant Secretary of Defense Homeland Defense and Global Security (ASD-HD & GS). The ASD-HD & GS current address: and fax number: 5. Chief, NGB and CDRUSNORTHCOM, will make recommendations to SecDef via the CJCS and ASD-HD & GS.    6. SecDef issues authorization memorandum to the Governor (as established in the MOA). 7. USNORTHCOM prepares the G-Series orders granting DSC Title 10 Command Authority and coordinates with the USNORTHCOM Service Component (Army or Air Force) for the Title 10 Active Duty Operational Support (ADOS) orders for pay; and JFHQ-State prepares and issues State orders appointing approved DSC as JTF Commander.    DSC Termination and Extension: There are three methods for establishing the appointment termination date of a DSC, as described below: 1. Normal Termination: The DSC will normally be terminated IAW the date set in the SecDef authorization memorandum (appointment letter). 2. Extension: Both the Governor and SecDef must mutually agree to the extension of the original appointment. The Disestablishment Steering Group will make a recommendation to extend the DSC up both chains of command. The higher Federal Headquarters (NC/JFLCC) will make a recommendation for extension to USNORTHCOM. The CDRUSNORTHCOM will then make a recommendation for extension to the SecDef, while the TAG will request extension to the Governor. The Governor will modify/revise the original letter of consent with the requested extension date, while the SecDef will modify/revise the original letter of authorization approving the requested extension date. 3. Early Termination: Either the Governor or SecDef may direct early termination IAW the associated DSC Memorandum of Agreement. The Disestablishment Steering Group will make a recommendation for early termination of the DSC (because the DSC's assigned missions have been completed or mission tasking conflicts cannot be resolved) to both chains of command. The termination can be originated by either the State or the Federal Chain of Commands. -For State (Governor) Early Termination. The Steering group will recommend to the DSC and TAG. DSC will sent letter to TAG, who will then send letter to Governor recommending termination. T10 chain of command will be informed of this State action. Once approved, Governor will write letter to SecDef with date and time that early termination will occur. -For Federal (T10) Early Termination. The Steering Grip will make a recommendation to the higher T10 Headquarters (NC or JFLCC) to make a recommendation for early termination to CDRUSNORTHCOM, who will then make a recommendation for early termination to the SecDef. State chain of command will be informed of this Federal action. Once approved, SecDef will write letter to Governor with date and time that early termination will occur.   For Termination other Stakeholders Requiring Notification and/or Input -Incident Cdrs -Affected City/County EMs -State EMA -DCO/DCE See notes for more detailed info

14 DSC Activity last 24 Months
ME WA Evergreen Tremor Cascadia Rising JSTC ND Visit JSTC MN Visit ID MT NY VT JSTC Visit OR JFO NH Visit JFO WI Cascadia Rising MI SD JSTC Miles Paratus Visit Visit MA Visit Cascadia Rising Sturgis Rally Northern Exposure CT Visit RI WY PA Visit IA Visit JSTC Rg 1 Visit WMoF DNC NJ Super Bowl NE OH JFOx2 Visit NV IL Visit Visit JSTC Visit IND CPX IN RNC UT Visit JFO MD CA DE JSTC Prairie Assurance Visit WV Visit Visit Rg 9 CO JSTC CUSEC CAP SHIELD WFF Conf Visit KS MO Visit DC Papal Visit JSTC Vibrant Response JSTC Visit VA KY JSTC NC JSTC Visit T10 Dep Visit/Trng (68) Visit Ardent Sentry AZ NM OK AR TN JSTC SC Visit GA Cascadia Rising MS AL Visit JSTCs (78) Super Bowl Visit JSTC Visit Visit JFOs (8) Slide OPR: Mr. Day TX Senior Leader TTX JSTC Visit DSC Exe (17) Visit AK Visit VGs (9) JFO Visit LA FL NSSE/SEARs (7) Visit CUSEC HI WFFs (0) Visit Hurricane (3) JSTC Flood (1) Tide Breaker IV GU As of 1 Jan 2017 PR USVI Visit Visit

15 2013 Colorado Flooding A DSC “Classic” Operation

16 Situation Overview Heavy Rainfall began 11 Sept 2013 causing catastrophic flooding 17 of 64 Colorado counties affected – Boulder County among hardest-hit communities T10 Aviation request / response for SAR under Immediate Response Authority (IRA) from Fort Carson, CO CONG Joint Task Force - Centennial activated (JTF-C) DSC requested and approved Title 10 Deputy and full JEC integrates into JTF-C State and Federal Disaster Declarations 2 x IMTs (ESF#4 Type 2) FEMA ESF#9 US&R IST (White) 5 x US&R TF (CO-1, NE-1, UT-1 / MO-1, NV-1)

17

18

19

20 A view of an are damaged by flooding in northern Colorado 14 Sep 2013.

21

22 JTF-Centennial Mission Command Diagram
President Governor SECDEF TAG CO OEM USNORTHCOM NGB JFHQ-CO JFLCC IC IMT2BLX IMT2LRX IC IC Joint Field Office Incident Commander Incident Commander FCO SCO DCO JTF-C Brig Gen Byrne JTF-C Staff (Integrated) Size ~770 PAX T32 ~643 T10 ~127 TF JRSOI TF GSAR TF Security TF- Aviation T-10 T-32 T-10/32 NG Aviation 4 CAB/4ID Command Coord Support

23 DSC JTF-C SAR Ops – CO Floods
ICP Larimer Christman Field SEOC CO JFHQ IMT (IC/SMC) CONG H60/CH47/H72 DSC County Line JTF-C ICP Boulder Boulder Muni Airport IMT (IC/SMC) T10 4ID H60/CH47 Fort Carson

24 Traditional Incident Management
Incident Response Incident Response Incident Mgmt Team Incident Spt Team ESF #4 ESF #9

25 Integrated Incident Command (Boulder, CO)
Integrated Response Incident Response RMA Team B DoD CONG Local FAA IST White UT TF-1 NE TF-1 CO TF-1

26 Rocky Mtn Area Integrated IMT B, Boulder, CO

27 Integrated Execution (CO TF-1 and DSC SAR)

28

29

30 Integrated Incident Cmd – Colorado Floods
Interagency collaboration among / across all Federal, State and local participating organizations Promoted strong Comms and Coordination De-conflicted and consolidated overlapping objectives and demobilization standards and criteria Leveraged organizational skill sets - enhanced capabilities and assets of other agencies and teams Streamlined response of operation Efficient management of all incident resources

31 Summary - DSC JTF and Key Areas of Coordination (SAR)

32 Summary – DSC JTF DSC JTFs have continued to be a success story (Presidential Summits, RNC, DNC, NSJ, Hurricane Sandy, Colorado Floods, etc.) Co-located T-10 / NG staff enables collaborated planning; leverage of individual skills, experience and organizational resources toward common objectives. ** Unity of Effort ** Facilitates T-10 collaborative planning with State ESFs Enables timely, “one-stop shopping” for military capabilities / resources Enable TF / mission CDRs to work directly w/ civilian authorities Direct Support to ICs LNOs/SMEs: Key toward achieving most efficient and effective use of JTF resources Since 2004 there have been over a dozen DSCs most being Title 32 NG Dual Status Commanders (USC 325) and 1 Active Component Dual Status Commander (USC 315) which was Brig Gen Nolan, from NC/SJFHQ for the 2010 National Boy Scout Jamboree at Ft. AP Hill (federal instillation) and mostly federal troops. In this case a Active Duty Cdr made sense. In all cases the commanders and leaders indicate that is a great way to command forces with a DSC Tying in DSC, there are many model for a Title 10 staff and Title 32 staff to support the commander. One is the Title 10 staff and the Title 32 staff operate separately and “do their own thing” with their forces. The best model is the “synchronized or consolidated” staff. That is where we create one HQ and we share the burden of staffing the HQ. For example, we have one JOC that is manned mostly by the NG with augmentation by Title 10 in key slots like a Title 10 Ops officer or as in many cased the Title 10 runs the KM. Reports can be synchronized to facilitate sharing of info—we’ll talk more about that in a minute. Blended Staffs work well together and nothing but complements from all the previous JTFs. (Every GO who has served as a Real World DSC agrees this is the way to do business.) The more coordination and development of JTF systems the better the JTF is when it forms. This is specially critical for a No-notice/limited notice event where time is of the essence. You’ve all heard the mantra…the more you sweat in training the less you bleed in war—same concept. The more we figure this out now, the better we all support our citizens. As for your JEC early to begin integration. There is no obligation since it is a “Free Chicken” program and Gen Jacoby will sent it if at all possible. Somewhat tied with this is ask for the JFO-State where the JEC comes and provides tailored training to the JTF staff. For an incident, there are many issues that develop early. Military forces rely on civilians to generate a requirement so we can support them. Assessments of what is needed takes time and many times the civilians may also be affected. Of note, for most civilian agencies at the local, state and even federal level, planning is a part time job to their main job. So obtaining the rigor on requirements takes time. 32

33 Key Areas of Coordination (SAR)
Integrated Ops / IM Collaborative planning Coordinated execution Leveraged resources CONOPS De-Centralized support Communications ICS 205 / Comms Plan Delivery of Survivors Lily Pads / CCPs Hospitals Geo-referencing Standard / Guidance Air Management Plan Over-arcing State Plan Airspace Deconfliction Airfields/Fuel Availability FAA LNO Animals Be prepared / Plan Special Instructions Safe, timely FOC / Op tempo Key to EMAC and OoA resources Updated daily

34 Unified Federal SAR iso of State (DSC JTF)
FCO (DCO) JPRC AFRCC FEMA HQ ESF #9 State EOC - ESF#9 ESF #9 Coord DCO JFO JTF-SAR JTF-CS TACON INCIDENT FEMA IST FEMARRCC DSC FSARCG IC / SMC IC /SMC

35 FIN

36 BACK UP

37 Integrated Planning / Response Coordination
FEMA DOD NPS USFWS USCG State SAR Integrated Planning CBP CAP NG FAA FEMA IMT/IC SAR ACTION PLAN WATERBOUR Assets AIR Assets LAND Assets I n t e r o p e r a b l e E x e c u t i o n

38 Interoperable Execution… add us&r
USCG, T32 and T10 Med & Heavy R/W DOI USFWS AirBoat USCG SPC AirBoat CBP MQ-9 Civ Air Patrol

39

40 Compatible Comms Plan

41 Geo-Referencing Problems during Catastrophic Incidents
1. How do SAR Responders navigate when landmarks (e.g., street signs) are destroyed? 2. How do SAR Responders communicate position in a common language? 3. How do numerous SAR responders deconflict in a common operating area.

42 Geo-Referencing

43 Delivery of Survivors Places of Safety Lily Pads Out of Area Transport

44 Hospital, Lily pad, Airfield/Fuel Status

45 Animals

46 Initial Damage Estimated $2 Billion in damages
7 confirmed fatalities, 218 injuries 3,120 lives saved 18,147 residents evacuated Destroyed: 18,882 homes 200 commercial buildings Damaged: 16,063 homes, 1,509 commercial Over 20,000 oil wells affected Sporadic power/gas outages continue throughout the affected area Several water treatment plants compromised; boil water orders in effect for numerous counties 200 miles of road damages and over 50 bridges, over 100 road closures reported by Colorado DOT

47 Day to Day SAR within NC SRR
State SAR AHJ AFRCC 911 Reporting Source

48 DOD Support to Civil SAR
DODI September 26, 2011 Establishes policy and assigns responsibilities for DOD civil search and rescue (SAR) activities. Support domestic civil authorities providing civil SAR service to the fullest extend practicable on a not to interfere basis with primary duties and iaw applicable directives, plans, guidelines, and agreements. COCOMs and local CDRs encouraged to develop SAR Agreements with State/local SAR authorities Support foreign civil SAR ops in territory and international waters beyond US recognized SRRs. Civil Standards, procedures, and SAR terms and terminology (NSP, IAMSAR, NSS) shall be followed to the maximum extend possible.

49 Ways to get Federal/DoD support
Civil Authority - Direct to a DoD Official May respond under Commander’s Immediate Response Authority When assets are available and timeliness is key Civil Authority - to Rescue Coordination Center (RCC) For SAR or SAR enabling resources (Air, Land, Waterborne) AFRCC/AKRCC for State Inland response USCG Regional RCC for Waterborne RCC will coordinate SAR services IAW Nat’l SAR Coordinator (SC) responsibilities (CDR USNORTHCOM is SC for lower 48 States) Under National SAR Plan - No MA required Civil Authority - Submit written request with commitment to reimburse IAW DoDD Normally after federal ESFs are activated Normally associated with Declaration, Stafford Act, Economy Act We know as a federal Mission Assignment (MA)

50 Military Mission Command


Download ppt "DoD Support to Search and Rescue"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google