Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byClemence Reed Modified over 7 years ago
1
Diagnosing & Treating Musculoskeletal Pain In Working-Aged Adults
The Importance of Identifying The Central Pain Phenotype 5/6/17 Presented By: Daniel Clauw, MD Paul Coelho, MD
2
Disclosures: Dr. Clauw Consulting
Pfizer, Forest, Eli Lilly, Pierre Fabre, Cypress Biosciences, Wyeth, UCB, Astra Zeneca, Merck, J&J, Nuvo, Jazz, Abbott, Cerephex, Iroko, Tonix, Theravance, Samumed, Zynerba, Aptinyx Research Support Pfizer, Cypress Biosciences, Forest, Merck, Nuvo, Cerephex Dr. Coelho Has no disclosures. He will not be discussing any off-label uses of medications or devices.
3
Table of Contents Early Pain Models Modern Pain Models
FMS, HA, and LBP The Central Pain Phenotype Sample Case Evidence-Based Treatments
4
1980 Model of MSK Pain Nociceptive Neuropathic
Primarily due to inflammation or tissue damage in the periphery Damage or entrapment of peripheral nerves. NSAID/Opioid Responsive Responds to both peripheral and central pharmacotherapy. Responds to procedures. Does not respond to procedures. Behavioral factors minor. Examples: Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis, cancer pain. Examples: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia.
5
1990 FMS
6
Portenoy Portenoy/Foley
US Overdose Deaths Peak Incidence of Prescription OD 45-54 Portenoy Recants 2012 Portenoy Portenoy/Foley 1986 Porter & Jick 1980
7
Variation in Opioid Rx’ing for FMS 2007-2009
Peak Incidence of Prescription OD 45-54
8
35% of FMS Pt’s Receive SSDI
Disabled Medicare Beneficiaries Rx’d Opioids
9
FMS Patients Report High Pain Levels In Spite of High Dosages
10
Opioids In FMS: Once Started Seldom Stopped
N = 100K, 60% Received Opioids.
11
Opioids In FMS: Once Started Seldom Stopped
N = 64K, 44% Received Opioids.
12
30 Day Supply & Risk of COT 20% will remain on opioids at 3yrs.
13
FMS Is Not Opioid Responsive
Organization American Pain Society American Academy of Pain Medicine American Academy of Neurology European League Against Rheumatism Canadian Pain Society Canadian Rheumatology Association British Pain Society
14
2017 Model of MSK Pain Nociceptive Neuropathic Central
Primarily due to inflammation or tissue damage in the periphery Damage or entrapment of peripheral nerves. Primarily due to a central disturbance in pain processing. NSAID/Opioid Responsive Responds to both peripheral and central pharmacotherapy. Tricyclic neuro-active compounds. Opioid unresponsive. Responds to procedures. Does not respond to procedures. Behavioral factors minor. Behavioral Factors Prominent. Examples: Osteoarthritis, Rheumatoid arthritis, cancer pain. Examples: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia. Examples: FMS, cLBP, cHA, IBS.
15
Comorbid Pain in FMS is the Norm
“Overwhelming evidence reveals that what is often labeled as a single chronic regional pain syndrome is, upon closer evaluation, a chronic illness beginning much earlier in life, where the pain merely occurs at different points of the body at different points in time and is given different labels by subspecialists focusing on “their region” of the body.” Daniel Clauw, MD Low Back Pain
16
Prevalence of LBP & HA in FMS
2007 Internet Survey of 2596 FMS Pts Ave Age = 47 If due to chance alone LBP .3 x .05 =1.5% HA: .2 x .05 =1%
17
Prevalence of LBP & HA in FMS
18
Prevalence of FMS in cLBP 42%
Chance Alone: .3 x .05 = 1.5%
19
Prevalence of FMS in Migraineurs 56%
Chance Alone: .2 x .05 += 1%
20
Head Ache & LBP Predict FMS
21
Comorbid Pain in FMS is the Norm
Fibromyalgia Fibromyalgia Fibromyalgia Low Back Pain Low Back Pain Head Ache
22
Central Sensitivity Spectrum Disorders
23
Overlapping Chronic Pain Conditions
24
Prescribers are Poor at Diagnosing Central Pain Syndromes
23% Sensitivity N = 312, 240 FMS+
25
Prescribers are Poor at Diagnosing Central Pain Syndromes
27% Specificity N = 4M
26
Prescribers are Poor at Diagnosing Central Pain Syndromes
“You cannot guess at the extent of fatigue, unrefreshed sleep, cognitive problems, multiplicity of symptoms, and extent of pain without a detailed interview. The new criteria obligate you to pay careful attention to the patient if you want to diagnose fibromyalgia.” Fredrick Wolfe
27
Diagnosing Central Sensitivity Spectrum Disorders
Pain in many body regions. 2. Higher current and lifetime history of chronic pain in several body regions. 3. Multiple somatic symptoms (e.g., fatigue, memory difficulties, sleep problems, mood disturbance) 4. Negative Affect, dispositional pessimism, pain catastrophizing. (Stable trait vs transient state) 5. More sensitive to other sensory stimuli (e.g., bright light, loud noises, odors, other sensations in internal organs) to 2x more common in women. 7. Strong family history of chronic pain. 8. High self-reported pain & distress (VAS/NPS/PSD/PCS) 9. Pain triggered or exacerbated by stressors. 10. Peak prevalence of FMS age (working-age).* 11. Essentially normal physical examination +/- diffuse tenderness.
28
2016 FMS Survey Questionnaire
96% Sensitivity, 92% Specificity
29
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Moderate Risk 20-29 High Risk > 30
30
Elevated PCS Predicts Abuse
31
Elevated PCS Predicts Abuse
32
Elevated PCS Predicts Abuse
33
Why Is Dx’ing FMS/CSS Important?
It is opioid unresponsive. Once opioids are started FMS/CS patients are exquisitely sensitive to withdrawal symptoms & thus hard to taper. Guessing at the Dx makes for poor inter-rater reliability. Prognosis: Untreated it does not improve with time. When present amid other CNP conditions – HA, LBP, etc. – it is likely to be the primary source of morbidity. Patient expectations for treatment are often unrealistic. Provider satisfaction/comfort with care is low.
34
FMS Is Opioid Unresponsive
35
Natural Hx of FMS N = 1,555 11yr f/u
36
Natural Hx of FMS N = 76 2yr f/u
37
Natural Hx of FMS N = 1,644
38
FMS is the Primary Source of Morbidity in Mixed Pain States
N = 383, 76 FMS+
39
FMS is the Primary Source of Morbidity in Mixed-Pain States
N = 156, 25 FMS+
40
FMS is the Primary Source of Morbidity in Mixed Pain States
41
Patient Expectations In FMS
42
Provider Satisfaction
43
Sample Case
44
Joyce Joyce is a 45y/o woman who recently moved from CA to Jackson, County to retire. Her past medical history is significant for a work related back injury for which she was medically retired. She now receives SSD and seeks to establish care with you for primary care needs as well as pain management. Her medication regimen consists of Lisinopril for HTN. She is requesting “Percocet” for pain.
45
Joyce 10 >13 = FMS >13 = FMS 7 17
46
Joyce 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 48/52 >30 Abnl
47
Evidence-Based Treatments of FMS
Evidence Level Patient Education 1A Graded Exercise CBT Tricyclics SNRI’s Gabapentenoids NSAIDS 5D Opioids
48
Centralized Pain Pt Handout
49
Evidence-Based Treatments for FMS
50
Evidence-Based Treatments for FMS
51
Evidence-Based Treatments for Pain Catastrophizing
52
Evidence-Based Treatments for Pain Catastrophizing
53
Resources 2016 Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire
Evidence-Based Treatments for FMS, Dr. Clauw JAMA Daniel Clauw, MD Youtube Video for patients Sample Centralized Pain Patient Handout List of non-opioid alternatives for chronic non-cancer pain
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.