Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
2
Background Ohio couple married in Maryland as one man was dying of ALS. Survivor denied “surviving spouse” status as Ohio law only recognized traditional marriage.
3
Federal District Court
Dist. Court Judge ruled Ohio law discriminatory under the 14th Amend. “Equal Protection” Clause. Ohio appealed to 6th circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati.
4
6th Circuit 6th Circuit took an “originalist” view – no federal issue involved. First federal appeals court to uphold a ban on same-sex marriage. Obergefell appealed to S.C.. “circuit split”
5
Interest Group involvement
GLAD (Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders) picked up tab for Obergefell. Roughly 150 amicus briefs filed (including one by the Obama administration).
6
Supreme Court Supreme Court granted certiorari and heard oral arguments in April 2015. U.S. v. Windsor (2013) which struck down DOMA is an important precedent.
7
U.S. v. Windsor (2013) Court ruled 5-4 that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violated the equal protection standard inherent in the 5th Amendment. Decision required the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages.
8
Windsor split on the Court
Ginsburg Roberts Scalia Thomas Alito Breyer Kennedy Sotomayor Kagan
9
Obergefell decision Announced in June 2015.
Ohio law banning gay marriage struck down 5-4. Justices voted same as Windsor. Kennedy wrote the decision. Each justice in minority wrote his own dissent.
10
Where can I use this? Federalism – 10th Amendment
14th – Equal Protection Expansion of federal power Interest Groups – multiple access points Liberals v. Conservatives Influence of public opinion on public policy.
11
Where can I use this? Judicial Review. Checks & Balances.
Amicus curiae (or “green”) briefs. “Center controls the Court.” Judicial Activism v. Restraint. Stare decisis. Certiorari (“circuit split”).
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.